Mohamed Salah

[lito 180]

well,

chelsea palyed with one striker and benched 2 strikers

while they palyed with 3 AM players and benched only one AM player !!!!!

i didn't understand what that mean !!

[romeeh 139]

https://www.facebook.com/Picasoo.Momo22/photos/a.685849101465939.1073741828.685772548140261/799857446731770/?type=1

[romeeh 139]

An expected move for salah into sunderland this summer....wish him the best

[nazzab 180]

Rumours here in egypt about moving to sunderland ....

[stroey 2,525]

Rumours here in egypt about moving to sunderland ....

Loan?

[romeeh 139]

Loan?

http://metro.co.uk/2014/08/22/mohamed-salah-latest-player-to-be-linked-with-sunderland-transfer-move-4842115/

yes a loan expected

[pHaRaOn 2,131]

Isn't this story about Salah to Sunderland started from ITK accounts on twitter aka bullshit?

[Madmax 9,219]

Makes zero sense. We have 5 players for 3 positions (if playing 4231) and 4 players for 2 positions (if playing 433).

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

With van Ginkel go on loan rumour up again, I think Salah will stay. Unless Jose want to bring Di Maria or other wingers.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Isn't this story about Salah to Sunderland started from ITK accounts on twitter aka bullshit?

Exactly, can't find anything on the newspaper websites.

[stroey 2,525]

I can only see this move happening if we're going after Di Maria.

[LAM09 6,552]

I think him going to Sunderland would be pointless. I hope it is just a rumour.

[iseah100 5,612]

Well, shit, if MVG and Salah are going out on loan, let's get Di Maria. When he's on his top form only 2 players in the world are better than him. Fuck it.

[romeeh 139]

http://whatculture.com/sport/sunderland-transfers-black-cats-really-salah.php

[bababoom 4,478]

Does anyone think Salah may benefit from going out on loan? he's not going to get much chances here tbh and Sunderland would be great for him especially under Poyet.

[Jype 6,398]

Does anyone think Salah may benefit from going out on loan? he's not going to get much chances here tbh and Sunderland would be great for him especially under Poyet.

Maybe he would develop more by going there but that's not why he was bought and I'm pretty sure going to Sunderland for the 14/15 season was not on his mind when he decided to join Chelsea last January. He's more than ready to be an impact player for us and as the 5th AM he will get plenty of chances throughout the season. Even without injuries he can get a good amount of games, at least as a substitute, and he's only one injury or suspension away from playing in every game.

I seriously hope there's nothing in these loan rumours, same goes for van Ginkel. If we need to free up that one foreign player spot we can easily just leave out Schwarzer at least until January because behind Courtois and Cech he's hardly going to get a game.

[lito 180]

salah - filipe - hazard in the training today

[TorontoChelsea 4,064]

Makes zero sense. We have 5 players for 3 positions (if playing 4231) and 4 players for 2 positions (if playing 433).

That's without counting Ramires or Fabergas who can both play in attack and Mourinho also likes using a second striker a lot with one playing as a winger. I agree with you though. I doubt Salah is going anywhere. Loaning him would leave us really vulnerable in case of an injury anywhere in the midfielde. He was bought to be a rotation player/squad depth and that's what he will be. He will get his chance to play too. It's a long season.