Willian

[the wes 7,212]

So far this transfer season is a load of old tosh. More talk about goings than good comings

snap mate

[MihaiM24 156]

http://fat.gfycat.com/AllParchedJay.webm
Can sit down son..

[Gilvorak 3,734]

As if Juve would be interested lol. Made up rumour.

[Azpinator 2,325]

As if Juve would be interested lol. Made up rumour.

Why wouldn't they?

[didierforever 7,349]

Why wouldn't they?

cos only player worth being interested is in oscar!!!

[Oscar 441]

As if Juve would be interested lol. Made up rumour.

Highly doubt Juve would be interested in Willian.....

[Gilvorak 3,734]

Why wouldn't they?

They don't play wingers mate.

[Azpinator 2,325]

They don't play wingers mate.

Well he isn't just a winger, he has the defensive qualities for a team like them. But I get your point.

[JaKstone 307]

Why wouldn't they?

He is a liability in attack no offense.

[Madmax 9,219]

He is a liability in attack no offense.

Untrue.

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

Jose might as well make his decision and either convert him into a right fullback or play him in the middle somehow. As a winger he's a liability.

[Hybrid Angel 2,130]

Those who say Willian is a liability in Attack must have been watching another player in the second half of the season. It's obvious as day how much is decision-making has improved in the last 6 months. I think he was our most consistent performer and best player alongside Hazard in the 2nd half of the season.

[zolayes 14,489]

Those who say Willian is a liability in Attack must have been watching another player in the second half of the season. It's obvious as day how much is decision-making has improved in the last 6 months. I think he was our most consistent performer and best player alongside Hazard in the 2nd half of the season.

AGREE 100%

[Clockwork 1,794]

Which Orange circle is bigger?

Smh no love for our Defense in the second half of the season? I feel Hazard literally carried our team offensively, and match by match our defenders/GK(Tibo and Cech) one or another put in a MOTM performance. Our defense was so clutch it is criminal not put Azpi and Terry in the top 3 players of the second half of the season.

The thing is most believe Hazard was better in the second half of the season, but that untrue. It is only perceived that way because Cesc, Costa, Matic, and Oscar were all playing great football in first half of our season. Cesc and Costa were both in the argument as Chelsea POTY. In the second half their form severely went down, but Hazard form stayed the same. Hazard performance didn't change in the second half, everyone else did. Hazard was not better in the second half, it is false perception we came to believe because everyone else was worse.

You can never trust eyes. The answer to the circle question is they are both the same size.

How can people be so sure of how well Willian played in the second half of the season? couldn't that be a trick of the mind, because how faulty comparison is sometime. Because context matters we compare things to everything else, not for what they really are. Couldn't you mistake a 6/10 looking chick for a 10 if you put her in a room a bunch looking fugly chicks? YES you can, i have and i know this concept very well. Btw i am not saying Willian is a bad guy looking dude that is not what i am getting at.

Back to Willian how confident are you in your assessment? The stats doesn't say he was better at any important category if you want to bring up, but for some reason some think stats argument are weak and imaginary. Because there are outliers like Xavi and Ineista, that doesn't mean it is applicable to everyone. Some players are shit finishers and do not have an end product, it is that simple.

Also the quote "There are three kind of lies: Lies, damned Lies, and statistics" has been falsely attributed to Mark Twain and Einstein. They never said that, people credit them when stats didn't back their argument. Stats are not everything all the time, but for FFS they happen and it is reality don't swap them down just because they don't back up your theory/agenda.

Damn that is a long post, but if you read that thank you very much for your time.

[TheIceMan 596]

Which Orange circle is bigger?

1. no the left

[zolayes 14,489]

when the team were playing poorly he stepped up his performances , That was NOT an optical illusion . I am not saying he won us the title but his contribution was vital

and should not be demeaned.

[Clockwork 1,794]

1. no the left

They are both the same size, however you pick the one where most would say is smaller.

when the team were playing poorly he stepped up his performances , That was NOT an optical illusion . I am not saying he won us the title but his contribution was vital

and should not be demeaned.

Demeaned? How so? I do not do so. Football is a team sport, a lot of players contributed to our season success. Even unpopular players like Cahill, who should be given the same amount of credit. You could make the same argument for him.

Just because i do not inflate Willian performance does not mean i am demonizing him. A huge contrast. His second half was better then his first, but a minimal change.

My post was meant to give a unique perspective my friend. Where can you(anyone) prove that Willian was as good as the majority here believe to be?

[TheIceMan 596]

however you pick the one where most would say is smaller

Is that bad?