Marco van Ginkel

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

That's the worst comparison ever. Oscar has the right attributes to play in the pivot so it really isn't like playing Hazard at LB.

There's no use trying to talk sense into someone like him.

[KristerFagermo 3]

What type of player is he? Anyone care to elaborate?

Box to Box, can defend & attack.

[KristerFagermo 3]

4-2-3-1

Van Ginkel/Romeu/Essien & Ramires

Oscar, Mata & Hazard. Mou have said it will be alot of Rotation, so game problems would not be a issue, we have Moses, De Bruyne & Schurrle.

Chelsea would surely play 70+ games (With the international) so we need more depth, thats why i would like Van ginkel to come, to bring Offensiv & Defensiv qualitys.

When you see Lampard & Ramires play togheter you often see Ramires doing the hard work & Lampard doing what he can do the best.

If Van Ginkel is the new Lampard i would love seeing him & Ramires doing the same.

[bluesman2610 1,341]

now that united have thrown their name in there he is now rated @ £15m he was £8 last week the medis is such utter tripe..

[Toli 977]

Francois Piraux ‏@F8Piraux 1m

Vitesse Marco van Ginkel is close to sign a three-year contract to Chelsea this summer for €10M, according to @StefanCoerts. #CFC

[The only place to be 11,313]

Francois Piraux ‏@F8Piraux 1m

Vitesse Marco van Ginkel is close to sign a three-year contract to Chelsea this summer for €10M, according to @StefanCoerts. #CFC

My immediate reaction is that's complete bollocks - three years? Nope.

[Toli 977]

My immediate reaction is that's complete bollocks - three years? Nope.

he was quoted wrong. he meant that Van Ginkel has a contract till 2015...not that he will sign a 3-year-contract.

[Jype 6,398]

he was quoted wrong. he meant that Van Ginkel has a contract till 2015...not that he will sign a 3-year-contract.

2015 is only two years away so that still doesn't make sense.

Five years more likely, I don't think I remember the club ever giving a new signing under 25 a contract less than four years.

[The only place to be 11,313]

he was quoted wrong. he meant that Van Ginkel has a contract till 2015...not that he will sign a 3-year-contract.

Fair enough. If we do get him then five years is the standard.

[yuvala 2,167]

All goals and assists this season. Might not exactly reflect his abillity but worth watching.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Faq0RgKxfr0

[edenhazard17 281]

Didn't we have a first option to buy, if Vitesse willing to sell any of their players?

[magic weeds 446]

Apparently Vitesse want to keep Kakuta permanently.

I´d say YES, but put in a buy back clause. Just dont want the Matic situation anymore

[Special Juan 27,425]

It's quite clear to me Kakuta has no future at this club, if he was all that he would of been more here than he has been away from the club.

Get shot.

[BenIsLegend 475]

Saw this comment on Twitter, thought it was funny : Vitesse want Kakuta for van Ginkel?Can we jus close dat deal 2day & send a box of chocolate 2 dem as appreciation#cfc

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Sky Sports News said Vitesse only want Kakuta on a loan-basis. However, if we do sell him, he have to put in a buy-back option.

[Beepu 1,714]

I think buy back clauses are necessary when selling young players. If the players dont turn out good then no harm done, ignore the clause. If he somehow become a quality player in the future we can activate it and not splash millions. Couldve done this on Matic, doubt anyone thought hed be good and im sure people now doubt kakuta will ever come good but thats why theres they buy back clause, just in case

[Mufassir08 2,400]

There hasnt been much noise about this transfer lately,i wonder why?

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

There hasnt been much noise about this transfer lately,i wonder why?

there has, just today actually. Read above