👕 Chelsea Kits Thread

[iseah100 5,612]

Not buying shit

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

The home one will look good on the players imo.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

The home one will looks much better without button, but overall it's still acceptable. The white one is fine. The black one I really don't like. The design seems boring and repetitive.

[Thendo 1,088]

Jason Cundy retweeted it aswell, for what it's worth

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

That would make sense - somebody told me the Samsung deal ends May 31.

[pHaRaOn 2,131]

That would make sense - somebody told me the Samsung deal ends May 31.

Sponsorship Director of Samsung: "Today's the end of a brilliant 10yr partnership"

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Thanks Samsung. Today and tomorrow will be the beginning of Yokohama days

[KevinAshburner 1,270]

the Samsung Logo icon link on the chelseafc.com website has been removed and now we wait for the adding of the Yokohama Rubber link icon to the Yokohama Rubber website.

the sponsors and partners link on CFC website brings up an error page. they are currently updating it.

If we lose or draw our first game against Sydney FC on Tuesday night in Australia. It might Be a bad luck Sponsor or a bad way to start our first game in our New Jersey Sponsor.

I have a lot of Superstitions and I know that things have good and bad luck. Starting from The Sydney FC game and moving forwards with this New Sponsor. lets see how much bad and good luck we get from Yokohama.

Edited June 1, 2015 by KevinAshburner

[Adnane 1,101]

We might actually have a similar situation to the one we encountered 10 years ago, during a post-season game in Japan ( If I remember well ), we played with the 2004-2005 kits but included the new sponsor logo ( Samsung in fact ).

[Adnane 1,101]

Verified it, it was in South Korea, against Suwon Bluewings on May 20th 2005.

[Z4YN 20]

I absolutely like those rumoured kits, especially the white one. Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder I guess.

[LAB 1,030]

Prefer this from our rumoured kits. It's bad but our's is the worst i've seen in years. The bottom one looks like swimming shorts though

[KevinAshburner 1,270]

here is the link where I uploaded it to : http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=opwqbr&s=8#.VWwo4EYtHCY

my favourite shirts are the 2001-2003 and 2003-2005 because the shirt is plain and nice royal blue simple template design.

I also only prefer the CFC logo for 1999-2001 to 2001-2003-2005 over the current logo we changed to 2005-2006 to 2015 season onwards.

also 2006 to 2016 is Chelsea FC 10 Years Partnership between Adidas as our Uniform Kit Makers.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Apparently those are already on sale in India:

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Apparently those are already on sale in India:

Having gold badges will make it even more of a mess.

[Billy. 2,742]

Apparently those are already on sale in India:

looks class to me

[Madmax 9,219]

The sleeves, the collar, the button, the ugly red Y, the gold badges ... nope, never going to warm to this one. I hope JT sticks around in 16-17 so I can get my hands on a nice Chelsea home Terry 26 shirt.

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

Being on sale in India for months is no proof of legitimacy