Yann M'Vila

[Ramires7 32]

why arent we going after this guy?? does anybody know how much Arsenal is bidding for him??

[Leif 6,006]

I believe Arsenal will/have bid anywhere between £16mil - £24mil. He's worth it.

[Ramires7 32]

wow... what is roman waiting for then... he would slot in perfectly right away... i hope we steal him from arsenal

[Stats 7,059]

Why do we need him? We have Ramires/Mikel/Lampard/Meireles/Mceachran and Romeu. He is a quality player though but can't see it

[Spike 12,049]

This guy is a criminal. Ask seb and he will tell you all about his trouble with the the law.

[Ramires7 32]

meireles is not that good... mikel eventhough has been performing well late last season is inconsistent... essien is not his former self... if meireles and essien leaves then i think we should go for him...

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

wow... what is roman waiting for then... he would slot in perfectly right away... i hope we steal him from arsenal

Sometimes it's not all about money when it comes to transfer market. With Wenger in charge, Arsenal is more attractive to most of French players than us.

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

M'Villa would probably suit Arsenal better anyways. He would be a nice signing by them.

[jmarlow 458]

Why do we need him? We have Ramires/Mikel/Lampard/Meireles/Mceachran and Romeu. He is a quality player though but can't see it

because he is a better DM than all of them!

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

because he is a better DM than all of them!

How do you work out such conclusion then? He is better than Mikel? I seriously doubt it. People here tends to overrate other players while seriously underestimate ours.

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

because he is a better DM than all of them!

i don't agree with that atall..but more importantly it looks like neither does the club.

[Severinb 309]

How do you work out such conclusion then? He is better than Mikel? I seriously doubt it. People here tends to overrate other players while seriously underestimate ours.

He can really pass well and can give a killer pass and that my friend mikel will never be able too! But i am sure if we give romeu time he can do that! Mikel can only pass the ball sideways or back so actualy he would be a great rugby player!

[bushman 2,043]

Arsens are a club of nippers. They won´t pay so much for the guy, I feel.

[jmarlow 458]

How do you work out such conclusion then? He is better than Mikel? I seriously doubt it. People here tends to overrate other players while seriously underestimate ours.

He is better than Mikel! Mikel only looks good when we play very defensive football, but with the squad we could potentially have next season we will be playing more attacking football and that is where Mikel struggles to do his job! I would have M'Villa or Tiote over Mikel if we are going to play attacking football next season.

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

He can really pass well and can give a killer pass and that my friend mikel will never be able too! But i am sure if we give romeu time he can do that! Mikel can only pass the ball sideways or back so actualy he would be a great rugby player!

he`s done it plenty of times already. i`m sorry for you that you haven't been able to pick that up off a small screen but even if Mvila can pass better that don't make him a better player than Mikel. we aren't talking creative playmakers here.

[Severinb 309]

he`s done it plenty of times already. i`m sorry for you that you haven't been able to pick that up off a small screen but even if Mvila can pass better that don't make him a better player than Mikel. we aren't talking creative playmakers here.

If you read my post correctly i never said he is better i just pointed out what mvila can do instead of mikel! I have seen him play forward sometimes but i would expect more good passes going forward from mikel! In modern football a DM should be able to do that in my eyes! But i dont think this is the correct place for such a discussion..

Back on topic i dont think we need mvila we have romeu!

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

If you read my post correctly i never said he is better i just pointed out what mvila can do instead of mikel! I have seen him play forward sometimes but i would expect more good passes going forward from mikel! In modern football a DM should be able to do that in my eyes! But i dont think this is the correct place for such a discussion..

Back on topic i dont think we need mvila we have romeu!

when you replied to a quoted post that asked the question how is Mvila better than Mikel with the opinion Mvila is a better passer. i don't see how different i could have took it. but i`ll accept that wasn't what you were trying to express now.

with Mikel i guess he`s always gonna polarise fans..and the site has had more than enough debates on the pros and cons of Mikel so i don't wanna start another one.

i agree that we don't need Mvila also because of Oriol. (and atleast in my eyes others we already have.)

[Severinb 309]

when you replied to a quoted post that asked the question how is Mvila better than Mikel with the opinion Mvila is a better passer. i don't see how different i could have took it. but i`ll accept that wasn't what you were trying to express now.

with Mikel i guess he`s always gonna polarise fans..and the site has had more than enough debates on the pros and cons of Mikel so i don't wanna start another one.

i agree that we don't need Mvila also because of Oriol. (and atleast in my eyes others we already have.)

Sorry mate did not read what i quated properly my bad! But its good that we agreed that we dont need him