Ryan Fong 2,776 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 wow... what is roman waiting for then... he would slot in perfectly right away... i hope we steal him from arsenalSometimes it's not all about money when it comes to transfer market. With Wenger in charge, Arsenal is more attractive to most of French players than us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 M'Villa would probably suit Arsenal better anyways. He would be a nice signing by them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarlow 458 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Why do we need him? We have Ramires/Mikel/Lampard/Meireles/Mceachran and Romeu. He is a quality player though but can't see itbecause he is a better DM than all of them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Fong 2,776 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 because he is a better DM than all of them!How do you work out such conclusion then? He is better than Mikel? I seriously doubt it. People here tends to overrate other players while seriously underestimate ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duppy Conqueror 1,565 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 because he is a better DM than all of them!i don't agree with that atall..but more importantly it looks like neither does the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severinb 309 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 How do you work out such conclusion then? He is better than Mikel? I seriously doubt it. People here tends to overrate other players while seriously underestimate ours.He can really pass well and can give a killer pass and that my friend mikel will never be able too! But i am sure if we give romeu time he can do that! Mikel can only pass the ball sideways or back so actualy he would be a great rugby player! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Arsens are a club of nippers. They won´t pay so much for the guy, I feel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarlow 458 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 How do you work out such conclusion then? He is better than Mikel? I seriously doubt it. People here tends to overrate other players while seriously underestimate ours.He is better than Mikel! Mikel only looks good when we play very defensive football, but with the squad we could potentially have next season we will be playing more attacking football and that is where Mikel struggles to do his job! I would have M'Villa or Tiote over Mikel if we are going to play attacking football next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duppy Conqueror 1,565 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 He can really pass well and can give a killer pass and that my friend mikel will never be able too! But i am sure if we give romeu time he can do that! Mikel can only pass the ball sideways or back so actualy he would be a great rugby player!he`s done it plenty of times already. i`m sorry for you that you haven't been able to pick that up off a small screen but even if Mvila can pass better that don't make him a better player than Mikel. we aren't talking creative playmakers here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severinb 309 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 he`s done it plenty of times already. i`m sorry for you that you haven't been able to pick that up off a small screen but even if Mvila can pass better that don't make him a better player than Mikel. we aren't talking creative playmakers here.If you read my post correctly i never said he is better i just pointed out what mvila can do instead of mikel! I have seen him play forward sometimes but i would expect more good passes going forward from mikel! In modern football a DM should be able to do that in my eyes! But i dont think this is the correct place for such a discussion..Back on topic i dont think we need mvila we have romeu! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duppy Conqueror 1,565 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 If you read my post correctly i never said he is better i just pointed out what mvila can do instead of mikel! I have seen him play forward sometimes but i would expect more good passes going forward from mikel! In modern football a DM should be able to do that in my eyes! But i dont think this is the correct place for such a discussion..Back on topic i dont think we need mvila we have romeu!when you replied to a quoted post that asked the question how is Mvila better than Mikel with the opinion Mvila is a better passer. i don't see how different i could have took it. but i`ll accept that wasn't what you were trying to express now.with Mikel i guess he`s always gonna polarise fans..and the site has had more than enough debates on the pros and cons of Mikel so i don't wanna start another one.i agree that we don't need Mvila also because of Oriol. (and atleast in my eyes others we already have.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severinb 309 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 when you replied to a quoted post that asked the question how is Mvila better than Mikel with the opinion Mvila is a better passer. i don't see how different i could have took it. but i`ll accept that wasn't what you were trying to express now.with Mikel i guess he`s always gonna polarise fans..and the site has had more than enough debates on the pros and cons of Mikel so i don't wanna start another one.i agree that we don't need Mvila also because of Oriol. (and atleast in my eyes others we already have.)Sorry mate did not read what i quated properly my bad! But its good that we agreed that we dont need him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 He's young,he's French,yup he is going to join Arsenal and then will leave them for City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 He's young,he's French,yup he is going to join Arsenal.Then after a year he is going to leave them for City because he likes their 'project' and will say it had nothing to do with money.You must be joking right?Saying something like that when Hazard join Chelsea saying those same words.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Great player but I put my hopes on Mikel. I would love to see Mvila to bigger club, it would be great for France too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 You must be joking right?Saying something like that when Hazard join Chelsea saying those same words....Intention was not to disrespect our new signing but I remember players like Clichy and Toure saying the same and btw Hazard joined us because of our Champions League triumph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Intention was not to disrespect our new signing but I remember players like Clichy and Toure saying the same and btw Hazard joined us because of our Champions League triumph.Just very hypocritical you comments, but if you wish to believe that oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Just very hypocritical you comments, but if you wish to believe that oh well.If you are insinuating that I feel that Hazard came here for the money then you are wrong.Why would I have anything against our new signing?Many of Arsenal's player have left them for City and merely state that they believe in City's project of winning titles.We are Chelsea and have won many titles in the past years,most recently the Champions League so don't know what your on about.My post had nothing to do with Hazard and was solely based upon Yann and the common trend of French players joining Arsenal and leaving for City.Clichy and Nasri being prime examples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin_3d 1,140 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 If you are insinuating that I feel that Hazard came here for the money then you are wrong.Why would I have anything against our new signing?Many of Arsenal's player have left them for City and merely state that they believe in City's project of winning titles.We are Chelsea and have won many titles in the past years,most recently the Champions League so don't know what your on about.My post had nothing to do with Hazard and was solely based upon Yann and the common trend of French players joining Arsenal and leaving for City.Clichy and Nasri being prime examples.Very hypocritical because of this:Pre-RomanThe players we had today would have not dream of coming.Torres, Cole, Ramires, David Luiz and much more.Players don't come for a club cause they like them.They rareley do. Players like Terry and Gerrard are rare!Today players want to win trophies and get pay good.Arsenal don't do that, Liverpool don't that, Newcastle don't do that.Barcelona, Madrid, City, Chelsea, United, Juventus and such challenge for honors and pay good money.Any player will come to any of these clubs.We are no different then any of these because we can offer the same thing. Other clubs might have more history, but if your club can challenge for tittle and pay good majority of players will go there.Hence your hypocritical comment of people coming to Chelsea because of that you just mention and not the reason which is quite obvious to everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Very hypocritical because of this:Pre-RomanThe players we had today would have not dream of coming.Torres, Cole, Ramires, David Luiz and much more.Players don't come for a club cause they like them.They rareley do. Players like Terry and Gerrard are rare!Today players want to win trophies and pay good.Arsenal don't do that, Liverpool don't that, Newcastle don't do that.Barcelona, Madrid, City, Chelsea, United, Juventus and such challenge for honors and pay good money.Any player will come to any of these clubs.We are no different then any of these because we can offer the same thing. Other clubs might have more history, but if your club can challenge for tittle and pay good majority of players will go there.Hence your hypocritical comment of people coming to Chelsea because of that you just mention.I think we can shorten this debate if I just edit the post to will leave Arsenal for City.No point debating.EDIT:Have omitted the last line,hope u understood what I was trying to convey all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts