Jump to content

Sir Alex Ferguson Thread


NishC300
 Share

Recommended Posts

Everything Ferguson said is true; that being I don't get your anger guys.

So you say Robbie built our CL winning team?

Yes he did.

And I think you may have some serious issue with understanding of written text because that is what @Joker10 said and yet you give him question that has allready been answered to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He never gets into anyone's head except the refs who fear him to begin with. What Mo used to do were mind games; these are not mind games, he is just elaborating his lack of class.

Well, if he only gets into the refs` head, that would be enough for me...

He made Benitez (and other coaches) busy with him and not with their team. That is geting into their heads and he did it more than a few times.

Also, if the media start asking questions about him in the press conference, he already got what he wanted (distraction).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything Ferguson said is true; that being I don't get your anger guys.

Yes he did.

And I think you may have some serious issue with understanding of written text because that is what @Joker10 said and yet you give him question that has allready been answered to.

Then I politely ask you to search in google what picture and written text means. Also, no need to go personal, we could have talked about it without giving stick to each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you say Robbie built our CL winning team?

No he didn't construct the team. But you missing another part of Ferguson quote, where he is implying that Rafa had nothing to do in getting the opportunity to compete for the CWC and is in a lucky position. CWC is not a tough competition to win, it is much more difficult qualifying for it.

You can't say the same regarding Robbie situation. He took over our CL campaign when we were down 3-1 to Napoli, nothing ideal about being put in that position. A poor circumstance to be put in. In our FA Cup campaign, He took over before the toughest part of the competition.

His CL and FA cup was deserving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Di Matteo didn't build that side - he certainly galvanised it though.

Let's not defend Fergie's bullshit mindgames just to have a pop at Benitez. Rafa is our new manager, and he's held in high enough esteem by Fergie that he deems it necessary to have a go at winding him up in his first interview.

We can all argue about what Roman does and doesn't know about football, but I can't imagine Fergie viewed Robbie in the same way.

Is Rafa lucky? Perhaps but every manager we've had since Jose has built on the foundations he built. That spine of Cech, Terry, Lampard and Drogba is primarily what got us through last season (obviously JT missed the final). Each manager has obviously tinkered with it but they were ALL lucky to come to a club with the resources we have.

But the weird thing is that I don't know many people who give a fuck about the CWC. Most fans see it as something of an inconvenience and not something that's all that important on a manager's CV.

Let's ignore what Fergie said and focus on WHY he said it.

We're 4 points behind them after a dodgy run of form. We've got no Champions League to worry about (in all likelihood) and we've hired a manager who has a pretty 'interesting' track record in this country.

Ask yourselves this - who do you think Fergie would rather manage a Chelsea team against him? Benitez or Di Matteo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No he didn't construct the team. But you missing another part of Ferguson quote, where he is implying that Rafa had nothing to do in getting the opportunity to compete for the CWC and is in a lucky position. CWC is not a tough competition to win, it is much more difficult qualifying for it.

You can't say the same regarding Robbie situation. He took over our CL campaign when we were down 3-1 to Napoli, nothing ideal about being put in that position. A poor circumstance to be put in. In our FA Cup campaign, He took over before the toughest part of the competition.

His CL and FA cup was deserving.

Yes, the two situation is not identically the same, and I agree with everything what you said, I just said that there is some similarity in the two cases.

Naturally, Robbie gets my full credit for winning the CL and the FA Cup, but for building the team, he doesn't. Of course, he made some tweaks, made certain things better, but that doesn't mean he built it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I politely ask you to search in google what picture and written text means. Also, no need to go personal, we could have talked about it without giving stick to each other.

I am sorry if it looks so. It wasn't meant to be personal at all.

I am just sick how people seems to have really short memory; not to mention they laugh at what Ferguson said when there is no reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Di Matteo didn't build that side - he certainly galvanised it though.

Let's not defend Fergie's bullshit mindgames just to have a pop at Benitez. Rafa is our new manager, and he's held in high enough esteem by Fergie that he deems it necessary to have a go at winding him up in his first interview.

We can all argue about what Roman does and doesn't know about football, but I can't imagine Fergie viewed Robbie in the same way.

Is Rafa lucky? Perhaps but every manager we've had since Jose has built on the foundations he built. That spine of Cech, Terry, Lampard and Drogba is primarily what got us through last season (obviously JT missed the final). Each manager has obviously tinkered with it but they were ALL lucky to come to a club with the resources we have.

But the weird thing is that I don't know many people who give a fuck about the CWC. Most fans see it as something of an inconvenience and not something that's all that important on a manager's CV.

Let's ignore what Fergie said and focus on WHY he said it.

We're 4 points behind them after a dodgy run of form. We've got no Champions League to worry about (in all likelihood) and we've hired a manager who has a pretty 'interesting' track record in this country.

Ask yourselves this - who do you think Fergie would rather manage a Chelsea team against him? Benitez or Di Matteo?

Since when were JT, Lamps and Cech Mourinho's foundations?

Hate to say but I agree with SAF. How difficult would it be to give the guy a chance just for two more weeks to get that CWC he deserved. Instead a fat waiter will come and claim a trophy he had nothing to do with. And if somebody says Di Matteo didn't build our 2011/12 squad, have you even wondered what the coaching stuff is supposed to do? It's not like they get paid for nothing. We thought our season was lost and Di Matteo revived us from the dead.

Dunno if you remember but if it wasn't for referees in that Premier League game SAF would've lost to Di Matteo twice.. The record was W1 L1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when were JT, Lamps and Cech Mourinho's foundations?

Hate to say but I agree with SAF. How difficult would it be to give the guy a chance just for two more weeks to get that CWC he deserved. Instead a fat waiter will come and claim a trophy he had nothing to do with. And if somebody says Di Matteo didn't build our 2011/12 squad, have you even wondered what the coaching stuff is supposed to do? It's not like they get paid for nothing. We thought our season was lost and Di Matteo revived us from the dead.

Dunno if you remember but if it wasn't for referees in that Premier League game SAF would've lost to Di Matteo twice.. The record was W1 L1

If it wasn't for referees AVB would have beaten Fergie twice. AVB told the team before he left they could win the CL, why not let him finish the run he started in both cups?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when were JT, Lamps and Cech Mourinho's foundations?

Hate to say but I agree with SAF. How difficult would it be to give the guy a chance just for two more weeks to get that CWC he deserved. Instead a fat waiter will come and claim a trophy he had nothing to do with. And if somebody says Di Matteo didn't build our 2011/12 squad, have you even wondered what the coaching stuff is supposed to do? It's not like they get paid for nothing. We thought our season was lost and Di Matteo revived us from the dead.

Dunno if you remember but if it wasn't for referees in that Premier League game SAF would've lost to Di Matteo twice.. The record was W1 L1

Sorry, but you can clearly see the difference in the way the team was structured before Mourinho, and after Mourinho. You can see it at every level of the club in fact from the first team right through the academy.

I'm not saying Robbie didn't do a tremendous job because he did. But his greatest move was abandoning some of the ridiculous tactics AVB employed and took Chelsea back to what they were under Mourinho - first and foremost, tough to beat. You stop the other team and then you focus on beating them, on the counter if you need to. That first game against Barca was classic Mourinho Chelsea, right down to Drogba's gamesmanship.

That doesn't mean Robbie doesn't deserve credit - I thought the use of Bertrand in the final was a great move, under pressure. But the foundations, the attitude, the arrogance of that team was still Mourinho.

It's part of the reason we've struggled to move on from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for referees AVB would have beaten Fergie twice. AVB told the team before he left they could win the CL, why not let him finish the run he started in both cups?

Maybe because we lost 21 out of 36 possible points between December and his departure? Maybe because we got beaten 3-1 in Naples and if it wasn't for Drogba's heroics against Valencia we wouldn't even get past group stage? Not to mention his fallout with the squad and humiliating defeats and draws against the likes of: Everton, WBA, Aston Villa, MU, Liverpool and the unforgetable 5-3 to Arsenal? And I said that he would've won twice because somebody asked whether I'd rather Di Matteo or Benitez against Fergie.

Sorry, but you can clearly see the difference in the way the team was structured before Mourinho, and after Mourinho. You can see it at every level of the club in fact from the first team right through the academy.

I'm not saying Robbie didn't do a tremendous job because he did. But his greatest move was abandoning some of the ridiculous tactics AVB employed and took Chelsea back to what they were under Mourinho - first and foremost, tough to beat. You stop the other team and then you focus on beating them, on the counter if you need to. That first game against Barca was classic Mourinho Chelsea, right down to Drogba's gamesmanship.

That doesn't mean Robbie doesn't deserve credit - I thought the use of Bertrand in the final was a great move, under pressure. But the foundations, the attitude, the arrogance of that team was still Mourinho.

It's part of the reason we've struggled to move on from him.

Only 4 out of 11 players who played that night in Munich were signed by Mourinho and the only players I can say that played as if it was Mourinho's Chelsea were Lamps and Drogba, whereas I don't recall Lampard having so much defensive duties as he had under Robbie. Please don't say that the good old - sit back and wait for the counter is mainly attibuted to Jose. It's been used in the past for so many times. How about we say that we played like the Euro 2004 winners Greece instead of Mourinho's Chelsea? Especially considering we didn't have as much width as we had under Mou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe because we lost 21 out of 36 possible points between December and his departure? Maybe because we got beaten 3-1 in Naples and if it wasn't for Drogba's heroics against Valencia we wouldn't even get past group stage? Not to mention his fallout with the squad and humiliating defeats and draws against the likes of: Everton, WBA, Aston Villa, MU, Liverpool and the unforgetable 5-3 to Arsenal? And I said that he would've won twice because somebody asked whether I'd rather Di Matteo or Benitez against Fergie.

Only 4 out of 11 players who played that night in Munich were signed by Mourinho and the only players I can say that played as if it was Mourinho's Chelsea were Lamps and Drogba, whereas I don't recall Lampard having so much defensive duties as he had under Robbie. Please don't say that the good old - sit back and wait for the counter is mainly attibuted to Jose. It's been used in the past for so many times. How about we say that we played like the Euro 2004 winners Greece instead of Mourinho's Chelsea? Especially considering we didn't have as much width as we had under Mou.

The key players that night were Cech, Cole, Mikel, Lamps and Drogba. They were all either signed by Mourinho or greatly influenced by him. For all of Robbie's great work in galvanising that squad, that night was very much the culmination of Mourinho's project and a couple of players' seasons of hard work.

And don't confuse width with wide players - we didn't have a Robben or Duff but if you actually look at the team, especially in Europe, the wide players (Ramires more than any other) were the most frequent out ball or focus of the attack. Even in the FA Cup semi-final and final we either used Drogba as a target man or used Ramires's pace on the right wing to break out of defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe because we lost 21 out of 36 possible points between December and his departure? Maybe because we got beaten 3-1 in Naples and if it wasn't for Drogba's heroics against Valencia we wouldn't even get past group stage? Not to mention his fallout with the squad and humiliating defeats and draws against the likes of: Everton, WBA, Aston Villa, MU, Liverpool and the unforgetable 5-3 to Arsenal? And I said that he would've won twice because somebody asked whether I'd rather Di Matteo or Benitez against Fergie.

The funny thing is most of those things now apply to RDM. Under him we won 2 of our last 8 games and with Man city and Fulham coming up, there's every chance of that bad run continuing. We got destroyed in Italy yet again, and lost to West brom yet again.

I'm pretty sure he was fired because Roman decided to act quicker this time, and not let things get as bad as they did under AVB - where we fell to 5th and needed to win CL to make the competition this season. If at the end of the season we end up in the top 4 then he would have been justified, whether anyone likes it or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You