22mek22 133 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I know someone who works at Anfield and from what he hears Torres is staying.Disappointing Chelsea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King11Didier 916 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Carlo won't sell Kalou.50mln + Anelka?????? Liverpool can go to fuck themselves.50mln-That is tooooo big price for this player.We can buy 3 excellent players with these money.Anelka-He is a classic player.He can score from every situation.He is old yes but he can help on Chelsea in different situations.You don't know what player we have to say that deal with Anelka is good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaChick 430 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 anyone think of the idea £40m + kalou ?:eyebrows:Eh no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corlett 202 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Carlo won't sell Kalou.50mln + Anelka?????? Liverpool can go to fuck themselves.50mln-That is tooooo big price for this player.We can buy 3 excellent players with these money.Anelka-He is a classic player.He can score from every situation.He is old yes but he can help on Chelsea in different situations.You don't know what player we have to say that deal with Anelka is good.Let's be honest, no we can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,260 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I know someone who works at Anfield and from what he hears Torres is staying.Disappointing Chelsea.Really? :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milllz 43 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Eh noit would be better than £50m + anelka though wouldnt it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaChick 430 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 it would be better than £50m + anelka though wouldnt it?Well atm Kalou is better than Anelka...and younger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Anelka is better than Torres. He never get injured, he helps the team, if not with goals, with his passes and with his good movements around the pitch.So 50m for a overrated striker plus Anelka is really stupid. If we include not Anelka, but Kalou in the deal will be OK, not because I think the spanish is worth 50m, but because I do believe that leting Kalou go is worth even more than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 It's kind of like when Essien scored that screamer vs Barcelona, he went straight to Mikel too.maybe he said to him, ''one day you might score a goal like that!'' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I just think they go to Mikel to rub it in. "Haha, I just scored, learn to shoot bitch." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 no way would I give scumpool 50 mill ..it could strengthen them too much ..If Rafa was still there it might be different he would have wasted it ..Dalglish might not .Also with our luck Torres would get long term injury ..Risk is too big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Signing Torres might be a mistake. He's injury prone and we'd have to change systems to enable him to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,535 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Wouldnt mind us signing him for 30,35 but plus a player no way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Anelka is better than Torres. He never get injured, he helps the team, if not with goals, with his passes and with his good movements around the pitch.So 50m for a overrated striker plus Anelka is really stupid. If we include not Anelka, but Kalou in the deal will be OK, not because I think the spanish is worth 50m, but because I do believe that leting Kalou go is worth even more than that. Torres is better then Anelka son ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 It's kind of like when Essien scored that screamer vs Barcelona, he went straight to Mikel too.That's cause before the game, Mikel told Essien that he has a feeling he'd score today. (Essien explained on "At home with Essien")Probably same deal with Kalou today.Mikel probably picks a random guy every game and tells him that so he can get free hugs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whinni09 37 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 to much for a player like torres. hope chelsea says 40 million or nothing.. hope they'll get ganso and a player like sergio ramos in the summer instead of torres tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diskoviolente 425 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 first of all: whats with all this "he is not physical enough" - thing ? Have you actually seen Torres play ? He is musceling defenders like Vidic and Rio away, even Terry, if fully fit.Next topic right away: in the past he didn´t have enough time to recover from his injuries and played through the pain barrier, pushed by Benitez because their simply was no other option.A 60% fit Torres is still better than the rest of the Liverpools striking options. End of.Rafa really ruined enough players, out of a humanistic impetus we should try to sign Nando ! Save a life everyday, like. With Drogba and Anelka in the autumn of their Chelsea carreers Torres is the perfect player to fill the gap between the older strikers and the young guns.He is in the middle, age wise, and if given the time on of the most lethal strikers you can have.He is world class. End of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 we'd have to change systems to enable him to play.Is that a bad thing necessarily? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 to much for a player like torres. hope chelsea says 40 million or nothing.. hope they'll get ganso and a player like sergio ramos in the summer instead of torres tbh Sergio Ramos, are you joking mate, the guy gets more red cards then Drogba scores goals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismada9 1,948 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Anelka is better than Torres.Dude, if you were to see the form of Anelka this season so far, you will find that statement isn't true! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.