Wishlist Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

[OneMoSalah 8,783]

18 minutes ago, Georgy said:

Dortmund wanted 60 mil in the summer hard to think it will go up if anything they will accept less now after the animosities between them.

It’s harder to buy in January, most clubs don’t want to sell their better players in the winter, it’s always harder to get suitable replacements as well. Fair enough he’s been a bit of a pain for them but it doesn’t always make clubs open to selling for less, look at the whole Costa situation here, clubs don’t want to lose quality players for less money. If a club is desperate enough to sign a player the selling clubs take advantage of that. Even Dembele in the summer once there was talk of Barca bids, he was fined and had a few falling outs on the way as he didn’t show up for training before they sold him for like over €100 million because Barcelona were desperate to sign him. Sure the transfer market has gone mental but they bid much much lower at first.

[the wes 7,212]

him and Morata up front with hazard behind the two of them would be powerful set up 

[manpe 10,861]

16 minutes ago, the wes said:

him and Morata up front with hazard behind the two of them would be powerful set up 

Yeah but that would give Hazard much more defensive responsibility. Not sure if we want that.

[Bernard N Y Burgesson 139]

haha Not yet but I see the day coming fast

Borussia Dortmund name their price for star striker Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/16/borussia-dortmund-name-their-price-for-star-striker-pierre-emerick-aubameyang-6384344/#ixzz4W1FU6eTL Borussia Dortmund would consider selling star striker Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang if they receive an offer in excess of €70million.

 

£61mill doesn't sound too ridiculous to me.

 

The day is here. We need him. We can't depend fully on Morata.

 

Sent from my Infinix X572 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

[BlueLyon 9,359]

He signed extension, bvb representatives said it couple days ago...

[Marvin123 484]

Matt law says he joins a club within 24 hours

[Georgy 439]

Were soon going to be the worst team from the Top 6, well done. Fucking cocksuckers we had money from the title won all momentum and fucked up every last bit. Club is run by idiots.

[Unionjack 7,531]

 

 

[Strike 7,250]

Lot of questions to the board if he joins Arsenal, Sanchez joins United and Chelsea don't sign an attacker.

[Special Juan 27,439]

Right now, and I wouldn't put it past the board, it sounds like Batman is off on loan and we are no nearer to a second choice striker.

Morata first choice and Hazard back up/false 9

[nyikolajevics 2,595]

28 minutes ago, Strike said:

Lot of questions to the board if he joins Arsenal, Sanchez joins United and Chelsea don't sign an attacker.

You might have missed the rumours about Carroll.

[Special Juan 27,439]

1 minute ago, nyikolajevics said:

You might have missed the rumours about Carroll.

Like most of us he's probably hoping if he ignores them they will go away.

[the wes 7,212]

Why don't we offer a loan swap deal with michy for PEA ffs that's to smart for our board to do 

[OneMoSalah 8,783]

Tbf that report about Arsenal and Malcom deal is apparently false, Wenger deemed him too inexperienced for the amount of £ Bordeaux want so whos to say they will get Aubameyang as well? I doubt they'd sign Lacazette for like 60m only to sign another 60m striker. People saying we would be worst team in top 6 should seriously check their heads out. Bit of an overreaction. We are short upfront and at LWB, not everywhere. 

[King11Didier 916]

I really hope there is even a small chance that he comes to Chelsea. I rate him highly and I think he would be a great player in PL. It will be a shame if arsenal manage to get him.

[manpe 10,861]

19 minutes ago, Mana said:

Why aren't we linked with this guy? He would help our attack tremendously.

Because he's not a target man. It's obvious we're looking for a target man, keep up.  Plus we're not going to shell out 50m+ for a striker when we just did, budget backup options is where we are at now.

[the wes 7,212]

22 minutes ago, manpe said:

Because he's not a target man. It's obvious we're looking for a target man, keep up.  Plus we're not going to shell out 50m+ for a striker when we just did, budget backup options is where we are at now.

If we are looking a target man we have one in Swansea but thats to smart for our board to recall him back 

[manpe 10,861]

4 minutes ago, Mana said:

We already HAVE a target man in Morata. Why do we need another. And the ones we are looking at are useless.

Morata is not a target man.

2 minutes ago, the wes said:

If we are looking a target man we have one in Swansea but thats to smart for our board to recall him back 

Why stall Tammy's progress by bringing him here? It's said the club/Conte wants an experienced backup option that can be relied on, Tammy is not the answer and will probably be trusted less than Bats. It makes sense to bring in an older more experienced stop-gap until Tammy develops to the level we need, if he does.