New Signing Victor Moses Joins Chelsea

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Very excited about how he will play and about number; I like it as it is, everyone cant be 10, 11, 8, 9,...Number 33 is different and more special, unusual and if Moses becomes good, I hope he will have this number forever. It may not be attractive right now, but if he becomes sensation, this will be hell of a great kit.

Remember Kaka at Milan with 22 on his back?

[nyikolajevics 2,690]

SWP was bought as a starter. Moses wasn't. There'll be less pressure on him and to be honest, his potential ceiling is higher than SWP's ever was.

SWP wasn't as bad as he was painted out to be though. He was a useful player but just never really lived up to his hype, and his price tag especially. As Moses came for a lower fee and is not expected to start regularly I think he'll do better.

1. You couldn't know if Moses was bought as a starter or not. Maybe he is a big favourite of RDM, and he will play a lot.

2. SWP really was a useful player, even a hard worker, but we can't deny that he was dissapointing. In 2004/2005 he was fantastic at City, he scored 11 goal in that season, we all were expecting more from him. (he only scored 10 goal at Chelsea)

[DDA 9,927]

I see Victor is doing the old 'push your hands under your arms' trick to make his biceps look bigger than what they are.....Slippery customer...perfect for the wing.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Very happy to see him here. I'm looking forward to his debut on Friday! No more Ramires on the wing? I do hope so.

[zolayes 14,489]

1. You couldn't know if Moses was bought as a starter or not. Maybe he is a big favourite of RDM, and he will play a lot.

2. SWP really was a useful player, even a hard worker, but we can't deny that he was dissapointing. In 2004/2005 he was fantastic at City, he scored 11 goal in that season, we all were expecting more from him. (he only scored 10 goal at Chelsea)

for US swp was an absolute disaster ,,, Kalou was far better

[nyikolajevics 2,690]

for US swp was an absolute disaster ,,, Kalou was far better

Agree. Salo was cheaper, and he scored above 50 goals for us.

[Kajo 176]

Salomon "I can miss from 2m" Kalou ? This guy?

[Muzchap 8,966]

Salomon "I can miss from 2m" Kalou ? This guy?

LOL best post ever

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

We are signing some great players, but also people with right mentality. This will be one hell of a team, just be patient.

What language is he speaking with hazard?

[TheCount 146]

Kalou defo should of been kept instead of Malouda tho, but moses is probably better then both on form alone.

Dont understand letting Kalou go free, while keeping malouda or even selling him would of got more money the other way around ah well.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Well Kalou scored over 50 goals for us. Doesnt matter how important they were, its not easy to score that much goals. I think Torres will never score more than Kalou for Chelsea. Even Sheva couldnt.

But Anelka and Malouda were both class some time ago. Much underrated realy.

[Rambo 1,729]

Well Kalou scored over 50 goals for us. Doesnt matter how important they were, its not easy to score that much goals. I think Torres will never score more than Kalou for Chelsea. Even Sheva couldnt.

Kalou was relatively young when he joined Chelsea and was here for 6 seasons. It's difficult to compare him with the likes of Torres and Sheva.

[Melanicus 5,208]

Seems like Moses will have #13:

[BlueLyon 9,359]

Hm, I would prefer 33 over unlucky 13. Its just a number, but anyway. Ballack had it, but unfortunely won nothing in all those finals.

[yum 15]

Hm, I would prefer 33 over unlucky 13. Its just a number, but anyway. Ballack had it, but unfortunely won nothing in all those finals.

He won the League, League Cup, and 3 FA Cups with us. And he was very successful with Bayern.