The only place to be 11,313 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 the line at the end of your posts is the "TRUEST" thing i have ever read... are not we all already regretting it when we saw one guy give it his all on one end of the pitch and another one just standing there bloody daydreaming...We made the mistake signing Torres. We committed close to £100 million on him and that had other ramifications. We're seeing other results of it now.Continually moaning about selling Sturridge as an 'I told you so' really is fucking pathetic. Move on. Look to the future, and if you can't do that then support the red bunch. They never make bad decisions when it comes to transfers. SinineUltra 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 We made the mistake signing Torres. We committed close to £100 million on him and that had other ramifications. We're seeing other results of it now.Continually moaning about selling Sturridge as an 'I told you so' really is fucking pathetic. Move on. Look to the future, and if you can't do that then support the red bunch. They never make bad decisions when it comes to transfers.to look at the fucking future and have a decent future, u need to know and understand the bloody blunders and asenine mistakes of your fucking past. did we learn for a year and a half from the torres fiasco, NO... we gave him a complete season as our NO.1 and ONLY striker. how much do u think the board and even the fans have learnt from selling sturridge and keeping the fucking blonde twat... the answer is NADA. plus y should i stop saying told u so when people here had the guts and audacity to condemn sturridge on his one performance in 6 months with no match fitness, no starts prior to that one start against wba. and what the hell they still fucking think of only that 2-3 chances which sturridge failed to convert more than anythin else he has done ever. so my saying i told u so is a very appropriate response to people who ridiculed any1 who had the guts to write danny's name ahead of the ladyboy's in the match thread.also dont tell me what to support and what not to support. know your bloody limits... this is not the 1st time u have done this... remember the bloody leeds match-fiasco?... BlueSunshine 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan 17,957 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 His tackle against Bertrand was pretty dirty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Can this thread just be deleted and burned to ashes? xPetrCechx and The only place to be 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 His tackle against Bertrand was pretty dirty.AT LEAST HE APOLOGIZED... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Las7 951 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops. He did not want to play because for an year and a half that blonde piece of crap was selected up top despite being outscored by Sturridge the whole time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Can this thread just be deleted and burned to ashes?RIGHT! BIG CHELSEA'S MISTAKE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 to look at the fucking future and have a decent future, u need to know and understand the bloody blunders and asenine mistakes of your fucking past. did we learn for a year and a half from the torres fiasco, NO... we gave him a complete season as our NO.1 and ONLY striker. how much do u think the board and even the fans have learnt from selling sturridge and keeping the fucking blonde twat... the answer is NADA. plus y should i stop saying told u so when people here had the guts and audacity to condemn sturridge on his one performance in 6 months with no match fitness, no starts prior to that one start against wba. and what the hell they still fucking think of only that 2-3 chances which sturridge failed to convert more than anythin else he has done ever. so my saying i told u so is a very appropriate response to people who ridiculed any1 who had the guts to write danny's name ahead of the ladyboy's in the match thread.also dont tell me what to support and what not to support. know your bloody limits... this is not the 1st time u have done this... remember the bloody leeds match-fiasco?...Was that the Leeds match where you wanted them to beat us?We have looked at the mistakes of our past but we have to live with the ramifications of them for a while. We had to give Torres a chance because of the financial commitment we made to him. It's easy for people like you to say we should sell him or bench him but you don't have to think about the finances of the club.You make it sound like it was a straight choice between Sturridge and Torres, but there were other factors in play. He's gone now and he had a good game against us. He's also had bad ones and was benched for this one. As for my limits, I think I'll comment on what I want, when I want. If you don't like it, meh. SinineUltra 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 He did not want to play because for an year and a half that blonde piece of crap was selected up top despite being outscored by Sturridge the whole time. Torres cost £50 million PLUS wages. You have to remember this because it does matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops. HE DID NOT WANNA PLAY FOR US?! Are you actually taking the piss? If anything, Sturridge wanted to play EVERY game. But yeah, let's twist things the way you want. Smh."Shitty attitude, selfishness" - :banghead: Badboy, didierforever, Rambo and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Las7 951 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Torres cost £50 million PLUS wages. You have to remember this because it does matter.Kaka is costing as much but is kept on the bench for Real, it's why our treatment of Torres is a farce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 He did not want to play because for an year and a half that blonde piece of crap was selected up top despite being outscored by Sturridge the whole time. If I remember well, he wasn´t much in those few games he played. Mind you I do agree he could have gotten more chances. His attitude was not what Chelsea needed. Let him play for Liverpoops, he is not missed by Chelsea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Kaka is costing as much but is kept on the bench for Real, it's why our treatment of Torres is a farceApples and oranges. Financial realities matter unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ja1 1,166 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops. Yep I saw evidence of this 'shitty attitude' then, like the etiquette he shows to not celebrate the goal, or when he wanted to stop play and helped Bertrand back up after fouling him.I also saw evidence of him never passing the ball. You know, getting an assist and setting up 2 clear-cut chances. Badboy, Muzchap, Las7 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Las7 951 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Apples and oranges. Financial realities matter unfortunately.O Rly? You know what loosing out on the top 4 because of that blonde piece of crap will cost us nearly as much as we have spend on him. HE HAS NOT SCORED A GOAL IN THE LEAGUE SINCE DECEMBER.Meantime Sturridge scored goals against Us; City; Manchester United - for half an year Sturridge has more important goals for Liverpool in the League than Torres has for over 2 years at CFC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 HE DID NOT WANNA PLAY FOR US?! Are you actually taking the piss? If anything, Sturridge wanted to play EVERY game. But yeah, let's twist things the way you want. Smh."Shitty attitude, selfishness" - :banghead:He demanded position...CF or....No player should be allowed that. He even opened his mouth publically, not accepted by..calm down now. If you love him so much, you know what team he plays for now. Watch him there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Was that the Leeds match where you wanted them to beat us?We have looked at the mistakes of our past but we have to live with the ramifications of them for a while. We had to give Torres a chance because of the financial commitment we made to him. It's easy for people like you to say we should sell him or bench him but you don't have to think about the finances of the club.You make it sound like it was a straight choice between Sturridge and Torres, but there were other factors in play. He's gone now and he had a good game against us. He's also had bad ones and was benched for this one. As for my limits, I think I'll comment on what I want, when I want. If you don't like it, meh.yes it was the same leeds match. after which a couple of games later even u wanted us to lose to a team and when i caught u on that, i never got a reply back... i am sure u are gonna deny it so go ahead. (i think it was the southampton game after the qpr loss, so dont see much difference there. leeds means as much to me as southampton.)i am a fan... there is only so much i think do by "thinking about the finances".. if we can spend 75mil on transfers this season, i am sure we could have sold torres after our CL high, bought another striker or kept faith in lukaku and sturridge (honestly speaking, we would have won a couple of clubs and would be sitting pretty at 3rd or 2nd by now). as i said i am a fan and i want my team to win every bloody match they play. if selling torres does it, so be it. plus i dont see the difference between keeping torres and playing him every match and selling him and incurring the wrath of FFP. in both cases we would be missing european football, so your point is barely valid there.getting benched can also be a tactical change. it does not always mean that the player is awful. plus it is a very very straight forward choice between torres and sturridge. torres gives us NOTHING except for FA cup and europa league matches against championship level teams. if sturridge can put a good performance in even one PL game, he deserves it more than torres.dont u see the double standards in your fucking words. u just told me not to write about an ex-player (when i dint qoute u or reply to u or was even being offensive to any1 anywhere but just praising another poster for his tag line)... and now u say u can write anything u want. u know what either improve your attitude or just bloody FUCK OFF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Yep I saw evidence of this 'shitty attitude' then, like the etiquette he shows to not celebrate the goal, or when he wanted to stop play and helped Bertrand back up after fouling him.Wrong comparison.I hope you didn´t want him to bite Bert, did you?This is going round & round, nice chatting with you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ja1 1,166 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 He demanded position...CF or....No player should be allowed that. He even opened his mouth publically, not accepted by..calm down now. If you love him so much, you know what team he plays for now. Watch him there.Oh another stereotype! "I'd never refuse to play in that position and I've never demanded to play up front, either. Whatever the manager wants me to do, I will do."Sturridge quote. Amblève., Blue Armour and Muzchap 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.