Eden Hazard

[MoroccanBlue 5,320]

Read somewhere CHO could be back for the start of the season. 

[whats happening 1,534]

pasalic better than kovacic? jesus christ

[milka 3,356]

GK : Kepa / Caballero

RB : Zappacosta/James/ Azpi

CB: Luiz/Rudiger/Christensen/Zouma

LB: Emerson/Kenedy/Alonson(if dont leave to Atletico)

CM:  Jorginho/Kante/RLC/Mount/Kovacic/Barkley/Bakayoko

LW: Willian/Pedro

RW: Hudson-Odoi/Pulisic 

ST: Giroud/ Abraham/ Batshuayi

 

[MoroccanBlue 5,320]

That team looks good enough to fight against Wolves for 6th

[milka 3,356]

With transfer ban this is enough 

[OhForAGreavsie 5,898]

18 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

£88.5m with performance based add ons? What a joke, theres no guarantee we will ever get that full £130m. Wasnt it not £130m we wanted to start with? What the fuck is Marina playing at? Turned down 65m for Willian but is willing to let Eden go for £23.5m more upfront and performance related add ons that may never come to fruition? She needs a headcheck. Or sacked.

It's easy to type out your wish list of outcomes. Negotiating them into reality is a completely different situation. It baffles me how people who have never negotiated a transfer deal in their lives, who have no clue about the facts of the deal, can nevertheless post with such certainty about how much better they could do it.

Let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you have the qualities to hammer out a better deal than Marina and her team of lawyers. Doing so would entail being prepared to walk away if Real don't stomp up.  Would you be prepared to walk away?

Bear in mind that Real Madrid are not Chelsea. In recent seasons we've engaged in long, and ultimately unsuccessful, pursuits of a number of players. In the end all of those players were prepared to sign new deals with their existing clubs and give up the opportunity to join Chelsea. That would not have been the case if the buying club had been Real Madrid. Eden is never going to turn his back on Madrid and sign a new deal with us. As negotiator, you know the implications of that fact. Are you still prepared to walk away from the table?

If the report is accurate and Marina has negotiated £88.8m guaranteed, plus up to £41.2m in add-ons, then her bosses are more likely to give her a bonus than they are to give her the bullet.

 

[the wes 7,212]

 

[milka 3,356]

[bluephoenix 1,126]

Good luck hazard

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

[OneMoSalah 8,785]

36 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

It's easy to type out your wish list of outcomes. Negotiating them into reality is a completely different situation. It baffles me how people who have never negotiated a transfer deal in their lives, who have no clue about the facts of the deal, can nevertheless post with such certainty about how much better they could do it.

Let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you have the qualities to hammer out a better deal than Marina and her team of lawyers. Doing so would entail being prepared to walk away if Real don't stomp up.  Would you be prepared to walk away?

Bear in mind that Real Madrid are not Chelsea. In recent seasons we've engaged in long, and ultimately unsuccessful, pursuits of a number of players. In the end all of those players were prepared to sign new deals with their existing clubs and give up the opportunity to join Chelsea. That would not have been the case if the buying club had been Real Madrid. Eden is never going to turn his back on Madrid and sign a new deal with us. As negotiator, you know the implications of that fact. And you are still prepared to walk away from the table?

If the report is accurate, and Marina has negotiated £88.8m plus up to £41.2m in bonuses, then her bosses are more likely to give her a bonus than the sack.

 

My biggest concern is we could hahe sold him last summer for over 170m easily but have now settled for 88m upfront and 42m in add ons 🤣 which depending on what their based on might not actually fully pay out. For a club who is notoriously difficult to buy from unless their price is met ie. Diego Costa, Juan Mata, Oscar etc in the past it seems mad that we are willing to bow down to Real and let them sign our best player for 88.5m upfront with the possibility of another 41.5m which we might not get all of it. It just seems like something we wouldnt do as a club. Also considering we wont release our manager unless Juventus pay the full duration of his contract or wouldnt sell Willian for 65m because he was valued higher so why is it any different regarding selling Eden for less than the original asking price? If we didnt sell him and kept him another year how desperste do you think Madrid would be for a 29 year old free agent with huge wages and a huge sign on and agent fee?

[Jase 43,479]

Not sure why are people assuming the add-ons to be trophies count when it could easily be goals, assists, appearances etc (Telegraph reported the add-ons are EASILY ACHIEVABLE). And even if it's trophies, do people really think Real won't win something again soon with the way they're rebuilding their squad?

[Hamilton 2,120]

Reading over here that it’s guaranteed bonus add-ons, if true this is a good deal

[Vesper 29,022]

1 hour ago, the wes said:

 

£130m (if he hits all the add-ons) is brilliant business given he only had a year to go on his contract

[Superblue 6,372]

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

My biggest concern is we could hahe sold him last summer for over 170m easily but have now settled for 88m upfront and 42m in add ons 🤣 which depending on what their based on might not actually fully pay out. For a club who is notoriously difficult to buy from unless their price is met ie. Diego Costa, Juan Mata, Oscar etc in the past it seems mad that we are willing to bow down to Real and let them sign our best player for 88.5m upfront with the possibility of another 41.5m which we might not get all of it. It just seems like something we wouldnt do as a club. Also considering we wont release our manager unless Juventus pay the full duration of his contract or wouldnt sell Willian for 65m because he was valued higher so why is it any different regarding selling Eden for less than the original asking price? If we didnt sell him and kept him another year how desperste do you think Madrid would be for a 29 year old free agent with huge wages and a huge sign on and agent fee?

Don't forget though we only got £35m for Courtois. The leverage as a selling club just isn't there once there is only a year left on a contract.

[Stats 7,059]

11 minutes ago, Superblue_1986 said:

Don't forget though we only got £35m for Courtois. The leverage as a selling club just isn't there once there is only a year left on a contract.

We also got Kovacic on loan. I doubt we would of had him on loan if we did not sell Courtois to them.

[Vesper 29,022]

The incredible level of consistency that Chelsea will miss when Eden Hazard joins Real Madrid

https://www.football.london/chelsea-fc/transfer-news/eden-hazard-real-madrid-consistency-16391779

[the wes 7,212]

[Fulham Broadway 16,923]

Commentators with their lazy analyses always say 'low centre of gravity' but he is so much more than that -his biggest asset is, like Lampard, is that rare beast -an intelligent footballer.

Well we had some good years out of him. Still think he should have listened to Drogba, stayed, and become immortalised as a Chelsea icon.