Eden Hazard

[Gorando 184]

Yea he's the best penalty taker in this team. He should also take some free kicks like he did at Lille.

[Santiago. 1,500]

Somebody is really taking the piss when they are comparing Gareth Bale to Cristiano Ronaldo

[NiclasCFC 2,582]

Again the Azpi rape face will haunt me forever...

[Heisenberg 1,824]

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AZPI IS JUST HAHAHAHA

Eden Hazard, i love you, what a signing it was, brilliant player, he remembers me Iniesta sometimes.

[juko 19]

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AZPI IS JUST HAHAHAHA

Eden Hazard, i love you, what a signing it was, brilliant player, he remembers me Iniesta sometimes.

iniesta? ronaldooooo

[Santiago. 1,500]

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AZPI IS JUST HAHAHAHA

Eden Hazard, i love you, what a signing it was, brilliant player, he remembers me Iniesta sometimes.

More like Joe Cole in his prime

[Styles 9,790]

More like Joe Cole in his prime

He is 10000x the player Joe Cole was. Even in his prime Cole wasn't this good and I remember Joe very well.

[Mundaka 243]

iniesta? ronaldooooo

A combination of the 2!

edit: without ronaldo's heading.

[Heisenberg 1,824]

More like Joe Cole in his prime

No, Joe Cole was not as good as Eden is, and its only his first season at the club.

[Rambo 1,729]

More like Joe Cole in his prime

Cole was good but Hazard is way more gifted than he ever was.

[Santiago. 1,500]

Lol many of you are failing to identify Joe Cole's remarkable form in our 05/06 campaign. Hence why I said prime and in resemblance to Hazard

[Styles 9,790]

Lol many of you are failing to identify Joe Cole 's remarkable form in our 05/06 campaign. Hence why I said prime and in resemblance to Hazard

If you add up all the times Joe Cole was in 'remarkable form' it wouldn't even amount to a full season. He was average for most of his Chelsea career. You could argue Hazard has already probably had more good games than Joe did in his entire Chelsea career. And there's nothing wrong with that because Hazard is a 32m player destined for great things. Joe was good but he never had this much potential despite what the English media want you to believe.

[Santiago. 1,500]

If you add up all the times Joe Cole was in 'remarkable form' it wouldn't even amount to a full season. He was average for most of his Chelsea career. You could argue Hazard has already probably had more good games than Joe did in his entire Chelsea career. And there's nothing wrong with that because Hazard is a 32m player destined for great things. Joe was good but he never had this much potential despite what the English media want you to believe.

Stopped reading when you stated he was average at best.

I'm not stating that Joe cole was better. don't knw where the fuck you conjured up that idea. Just the fact that the way Hazard plays best resembles when Joe Cole was in his prime with us, even with it being Hazards first season so I'm actually agreeing with you on the greater potential issue if you actually figured that out

[Mundaka 243]

You can't compare Hazard and Cole simply because Cole doesn't have Hazard's footballintelligence/vision/passing/off and on the ball movement... Cole was way more limited in his possibilities. Their looks are more alike than their football skills, its like comparing Lennon with Ronaldo or Caroll with Falcao.

[Santiago. 1,500]

You can't compare Hazard and Cole simply because Cole doesn't have Hazard's footballintelligence/vision/passing/off and on the ball movement... Cole was way more limited in his possibilities. Their looks are more alike than their football skills, its like comparing Lennon with Ronaldo or Caroll with Falcao.

No.

Just No.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

When he was in form,Cole was a great player but we all know that Hazard is the better player.

[Greyco 143]

Still... As an outsider, Cole was my favourite English player. In that whole hyped up England team of the last decade he was the only one I enjoyed watching. None of those other players had the possibility to do something extraordinary... and do it with flair and style.

[Rambo 1,729]

Stopped reading when you stated he was average at best.

I'm not stating that Joe cole was better. don't knw where the fuck you conjured up that idea. Just the fact that the way Hazard plays best resembles when Joe Cole was in his prime with us, even with it being Hazards first season so I'm actually agreeing with you on the greater potential issue if you actually figured that out

If what you're saying is Joe Cole is a poor man's Hazard, then yes you have a point.