Eden Hazard

[Unionjack 7,531]

Hes not looking like hes got his swag on - YET????? HOPEFULLY!!!!!

[Magic Lamps 11,653]

Hes staying!

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

One of the top 5 players to ever play for Chelsea. Only JT, Lamps and Didier ahead of Eden.  Almost everything he did with the ball today was class and things  only 2 or 3 players in world football could do . If this is his last game for Chelsea I'm happy to see him leave on a high. Shame we never built a truly top quality team around him or employed the right type of (attacking) manager post 2012/Eden Hazard era to build something truly special. Instead we've been more clueless than we've ever been in this era in terms of boardroom decisions. 

We can only imagine what could have been if Hazard had played alongside the likes of A young Didier and Lamps, Ballack, Robben, Essien and so on. 

[Unionjack 7,531]

What do peeps think about this afyer we derided the north London club for Jack Wilshere and Wojciech Szczesny  smoking?

U'm nowhere near a prudeand a playrs private life is just that but I don't agree they should do things like this that will bring the club into question. I can imagine theres a rule about it in their contracts. And a cigar that size isn't one for beginners. Personally I can't and never have seen the attraction. Its not like weed where you get something from it.

But more to the point it looks like our medical director needs to see a quack to get a bit fitter!

[Unionjack 7,531]

Transfer Talk: Man City to splash on Eden Hazard; Man United plot £250m overhaul

http://www.espn.co.uk/football/blog/transfer-talk/79/post/3505627/transfer-talk-manchester-city-to-splash-on-eden-hazard-manchester-united-plot-250m-overhaul

[Special Juan 27,422]

The touch from Cesc's pass was absolute world class and the way he runs across Jones and then shields the ball was beautiful.

We cannot let him go.

[Unionjack 7,531]

Just now, Mana said:

Hazard may go to Madrid, but heck naw he'll dare turn to Manchester City.

We would need to dish out the wellies cause there would be floods of tears on here!

[Jase 43,479]

 

[blues.bridge 343]

if we make a good market with 2-3 right purchases, the next season Hazard could be put  in condition to do his best season!
Sarri has made seeming Insigne a decent player,  Hazard can do a great things!

[The Skipper 20,593]

Our boy wants good football at The Bridge. 

[Unionjack 7,531]

36 minutes ago, The Skipper said:

Our boy wants good football at The Bridge. 

Does our boy want/consider big expensive players the only ones suitable to play in a team with? Because as ya know its going to be difficult for us to get them for many reasons.

Or would just Sarris style of play with him bringing in players he thinks will suit that style be ok for him?

We never really know who we have coming in till that last minute of the season when the wonky donkeys are normally hobbling around with their 'Chelsea Buy Me' cards arounf their necks.So eden wont know who he will have to play in the team with. So when does he make his decision if they are worthy of him?

I'm being devils advocate here as I understand both sides of the situation but I have to admit it that I dont like the way he has gone about the problem even if I understand what hes saying.

 

Tho I would love a team full of top well known players I would be happy to have a happy team, playing good football together and hopefully winning games no matter who they were.

I thhink that even if we dont end up winning silverware over Sarris contract - those 2 years will have got us playing a more up beat attacking football that should add to the defensive side we have now. And IF after those 2 years Roman decides another change is necessary then at least we should have a more well balanced side by then for the next manager to work with.

[The Skipper 20,593]

2 hours ago, Unionjack said:

Does our boy want/consider big expensive players the only ones suitable to play in a team with? Because as ya know its going to be difficult for us to get them for many reasons.

Or would just Sarris style of play with him bringing in players he thinks will suit that style be ok for him?

We never really know who we have coming in till that last minute of the season when the wonky donkeys are normally hobbling around with their 'Chelsea Buy Me' cards arounf their necks.So eden wont know who he will have to play in the team with. So when does he make his decision if they are worthy of him?

I'm being devils advocate here as I understand both sides of the situation but I have to admit it that I dont like the way he has gone about the problem even if I understand what hes saying.

 

Tho I would love a team full of top well known players I would be happy to have a happy team, playing good football together and hopefully winning games no matter who they were.

I thhink that even if we dont end up winning silverware over Sarris contract - those 2 years will have got us playing a more up beat attacking football that should add to the defensive side we have now. And IF after those 2 years Roman decides another change is necessary then at least we should have a more well balanced side by then for the next manager to work with.

If you look at Sarri’s Napoli he didn’t need big money players really to play the football that he does? Sarri would arguably already have a more talented squad here - We’re just missing some pieces (a midfielder, a forward, maybe another fullback). We don’t need well known players per se, we could go down the route of getting up and coming players, which shouldn’t be outside our capabilities. For me, it’s not about signing big players, but more about the cultural change of the team (as you said at the end of your post).

I think Hazard probably feels the same, hence the comments. More talented players (regardless of how well known they are) would be willing to play under a more progressive team, where they can enjoy their football whilst challenging for trophies as well. 

[Unionjack 7,531]

2 minutes ago, The Skipper said:

If you look at Sarri’s Napoli he didn’t need big money players really to play the football that he does? Sarri would arguably already have a more talented squad here - We’re just missing some pieces (a midfielder, a forward, maybe another fullback). For me, it’s not about signing big players, but more about the cultural change of the team (as you said at the end of your post). I think Hazard probably feels the same, hence the comments. 

Lets hope so mate.

Not NORMALLY a big name player has deserved to be just that. Tho they can lose their way going to a new team/country etc.

But if we could find the right ballance between the 2 it would be perfic!

[The Skipper 20,593]

2 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Lets hope so mate.

Not NORMALLY a big name player has deserved to be just that. Tho they can lose their way going to a new team/country etc.

But if we could find the right ballance between the 2 it would be perfic!

Whatever happens with Sarri if he does come, I just hope that the stigma of positive attacking football and winning things being impossible in conjunction to some in our fan base is dispelled. 

[Unionjack 7,531]

15 minutes ago, The Skipper said:

Whatever happens with Sarri if he does come, I just hope that the stigma of positive attacking football and winning things being impossible in conjunction to some in our fan base is dispelled. 

They only need to remember last year. Must have some problems if they cant remember that far back.

[Johnnyeye 7,440]

nice video, Hazard goals and assists for club and country this season

 

[Arlen Correa 161]

Hazard under a coach who is going to play high pressure/heavy possession

[the wes 7,212]

6 hours ago, Hazardinho Gaucho said:

Hazard under a coach who is going to play high pressure/heavy possession

Sarri will made hazard even better Player