Adnane 1,101 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Gotta love people here slagging off Eden with Cahill's topic inactive since July 30 Â Â xPetrCechx and Ryan Fong 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Always bottles one on ones, every time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Mikel OBE 4,920 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Adnane said: Gotta love people here slagging off Eden with Cahill's topic inactive since July 30 Â Â Oh we'll get to him. Adnane and xPetrCechx 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Stingray 9,441 Posted September 11, 2016 Popular Post! Share Posted September 11, 2016 Mmmm. Some cursed me on here when KDB came up as possibly the better talent. Eden started ok, but the game got to him and he underperformed. Both him and KDB need a good vibe to perform. If the vibe is good, they are world class. If their team is into a downfall, they go down with them. #belgianissues #pussies Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk Eidur the Spider, TheIceMan, Tautvix and 6 others 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 If this is Sarcams than i'll bite. Does this qualify as an excuse in 2016 now ?? No excuses, he was shit. Di Maria at United shit. Torres shit. Akinfewa shit. Nowhere near Torres shit tbh [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheIceMan 596 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 The Old Hazard's back!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Adnane 1,101 Posted September 11, 2016 Popular Post! Share Posted September 11, 2016 Wow. He litterally was nowhere as bad as you guys suggest. Easily created our best movements, should have got a couple of assists and maybe a goal if he was more clinical on his one on one. One average ( not even bad ) performance and people are already claiming he is back to last season ? You guys are UNBELIEVABLE. Mufassir08, Belgiannutt, Coop and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrExcalibur100 7,124 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 When Hazard isn't involved earlie in our attacking play, (no thanks to Costa and especially Oscar), we struggle to win football matches. And it's not for a lack of trying. He was making a lot of runs off the ball in this game but those two aforementioned players hardly ever passed him the ball. The first goal was them failing to clear their lines. Second goal, off a deflection. Chelsea = no Hazard / no party. This is blindingly obvious. Stingray and Coop 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Bottled that one-on-one... TheIceMan, Johnnyeye and kellzfresh 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eidur the Spider 4,515 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 He bottled the one on one for sure But Costa also angered me too seconds later trying to get a free kick by diving rather than going in for the kill. Pretty embarrassing bit of play for all involved I think. I was fucking furious so God knows what Conte has to say about it. Someone's waking up with a horses head in their bed.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyeye 7,509 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 2 minutes ago, Jason said: Bottled that one-on-one... more than once, he didn´t take on defenders as much as he should, its a shame, because he has that ability and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Not a vintage Hazard performance but bar the last 5-10 mins, he was still pretty decent. Also, whenever Hazard is gonna have an off game, are we gonna say stuff like "he's back to his last years form" and what not? Eden was brilliant during the first 3 games, let's not jump the gun and claim that he's back to his 2015 self. That said, He really should've taken the shot instead of passing it to Diego as he was in the better position to score and the angle did not suit Diego at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 The haters already creeping out of their hideouts I see... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 hour ago, MrExcalibur100 said: When Hazard isn't involved earlie in our attacking play, (no thanks to Costa and especially Oscar), we struggle to win football matches. And it's not for a lack of trying. He was making a lot of runs off the ball in this game but those two aforementioned players hardly ever passed him the ball. The first goal was them failing to clear their lines. Second goal, off a deflection. Chelsea = no Hazard / no party. This is blindingly obvious. Think that couldn't be more obvious in the last 10-15 minutes or so. Everyone's first option to pass to was Hazard. Honestly, based on what we have seen so far, if we don't have Costa, Hazard and Kante, we are going to be so screwed! kellzfresh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 minute ago, Jason said: Think that couldn't be more obvious in the last 10-15 minutes or so. Everyone's first option to pass to was Hazard. Honestly, based on what we have seen so far, if we don't have Costa, Hazard and Kante, we are going to be so screwed! Exactly Willian, Oscar and Matic are average Joes. Kante, Hazard and Costa are the main guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 53 minutes ago, Johnnyeye said: more than once, he didn´t take on defenders as much as he should, its a shame, because he has that ability and more. Disagree about him not taking defenders on. He bottled that one-on-one but on the other hand, he saved our ass (IIRC) by committing a tactical foul when Swansea countered and could have been free on goal. Johnnyeye 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrExcalibur100 7,124 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 19 minutes ago, Jason said: Think that couldn't be more obvious in the last 10-15 minutes or so. Everyone's first option to pass to was Hazard. Honestly, based on what we have seen so far, if we don't have Costa, Hazard and Kante, we are going to be so screwed! That's why we need Fabregas starting matches and not Oscar. He's the one that has the best rapport with Hazard and they find each other harmonically. Fabregas just has to start unless we'll struggle to win away from home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabHazard 655 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Other players have to step up to reduce the attacking burden on hazard....Willian is frustating as hell. Today Hazard was good in some parts of game..but he was terrible in the last 10 minutes of the match....Don't know what happened to him during that time ..he was acting like headless chicken.. Despiadado.Maleante and kellzfresh 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 9 hours ago, MrExcalibur100 said: When Hazard isn't involved earlie in our attacking play, (no thanks to Costa and especially Oscar), we struggle to win football matches. And it's not for a lack of trying. He was making a lot of runs off the ball in this game but those two aforementioned players hardly ever passed him the ball. The first goal was them failing to clear their lines. Second goal, off a deflection. Chelsea = no Hazard / no party. This is blindingly obvious. Costa has, with Hazard, won a lot of points for us this season. Hazard was extremely average today and Costa was very good, yet you always seem to criticise the former and think the latter is immune from it. That's not fair. Would love to see these countless off the ball runs Hazard did today too, because I just watched the game again and he didn't have that many. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 22 hours ago, Jason said: Disagree about him not taking defenders on. He bottled that one-on-one but on the other hand, he saved our ass (IIRC) by committing a tactical foul when Swansea countered and could have been free on goal. A tactical foul that came about from him losing the ball just before. Wouldn't praise him for that. Johnnyeye, kellzfresh and The Chels 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.