Stingray 9,441 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Longer match ban and a fine Thanks for the info. And ..... Fuck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 He should be able to play against Brentford though as he has until Jan 29th to answer the charges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 As expected.This game is dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I have been on the record I think Hazard was reckless and naive and I would have given him a yellow card and 1 match ban, but this is too much! I cant help to feel sorry for the kid (the real kid). WTF FA??????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hkibou 622 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Besides, this kind of decision by the FA is totally illogical... Doesn't do them any good, to the BPL either.If i was a superstar in the making, when i see how the media and the FA are treating players ... I'd choose to go to Spain, Italy or Germany rather than having to face that much stupidity. Stingray and MetsajCFC 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mediator 2,026 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 in case of 6 or 10 games ban, can't we send him on loan to another league until May? Lille maybe? or anywhere else just to say "fuck you" to the FA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hkibou 622 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 in case of 6 or 10 game ban, can't we send him on loan to another league until May? Lille maybe? or anywhere else just to say "fuck you" to the FA?Lille of course. Where'd he go ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,917 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 in case of 6 or 10 games ban, can't we send him on loan to another league until May? Lille maybe? or anywhere else just to say "fuck you" to the FA?Didnt Barton still have to serve his huge ban when he went to France? Don't think that would work. Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 How can someone allege this a "violent conduct" ?If i was Hazard i'd sue the FA for diffamation...Because the conduct was of a violent nature? --I really don't see how anyone's surprised by this or not even accepting of this. Hazard made a stupid decision, imo the punishment will fit the crime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 in case of 6 or 10 games ban, can't we send him on loan to another league until May? Lille maybe? or anywhere else just to say "fuck you" to the FA?No, FA will say he wont have completed the ban and will have to do it once he returns.Joey Barton anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Because the conduct was of a violent nature? --I really don't see how anyone's surprised by this or not even accepting of this. Hazard made a stupid decision, imo the punishment will fit the crime.Yes I agree he made a stupid decision (I have been discussing this over 3 days now), but isnt a 3 match ban enough??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Because the conduct was of a violent nature? --I really don't see how anyone's surprised by this or not even accepting of this. Hazard made a stupid decision, imo the punishment will fit the crime.You don't see how anyone is surprised Hazard gets charged for toe-poeking the ball from under that 18 year old man lying on the ball? Sod off. super_frank8 and Mufassir08 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinineUltra 1,170 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 3 match ban would have done the trick but instead he is being crucified. Swansea should be punished also. Call me paranoid but these kinds of things make me think the FA has a personal battle with Chelsea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Yes I agree he made a stupid decision (I have been discussing this over 3 days now), but isnt a 3 match ban enough???They're under pressure from a lot of sources to make that decision. I don't agree, but it is logical.You don't see how anyone is surprised Hazard gets charged for toe-poeking the ball from under that 18 year old man lying on the ball? Sod off.Because the boy isn't a professional footballer making ridiculous amount of money per week. He isn't part of the game, and even though he was wrong to be covering the ball, Hazard doesn't have the right to take matters into his own hands. He may have kicked the ball, but the nature of kicking it when the boy was on the ground equates to violent conduct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Because the boy isn't a professional footballer making ridiculous amount of money per week. He isn't part of the game, and even though he was wrong to be covering the ball, Hazard doesn't have the right to take matters into his own hands. He may have kicked the ball, but the nature of kicking it when the boy was on the ground equates to violent conduct.No the boy man drives around in an Audi, is about to inherit a fortune and denied 10-13yo kids who'd kill to be ball boy the chance to be there instead because dad is the director of Swansea. He said on twitter he was gonna waste time; how can you not see he's a spoiled brat who tricked Hazard to get into this situation? Are you daft?And if you find that little poke to get the ball 'taking matters in to your own hands' .. well, let's just say you should probably find another sport to follow. Where are the days football was a man's game? Azpinator 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 No the boy man drives around in an Audi, is about to inherit a fortune and denied 10-13yo kids who'd kill to be ball boy the chance to be there instead because dad is the director of Swansea. He said on twitter he was gonna waste time; how can you not see he's a spoiled brat who tricked Hazard to get into this situation? Are you daft?And if you find that little poke to get the ball 'taking matters in to your own hands' .. well, let's just say you should probably find another sport to follow. Where are the days football was a man's game?Lol what? where did you hear all that? Even though his intention was to entice Hazard into that situation it doesn't change the fact that Hazard allowed himself to get into that. The assistant referee should've been left to deal with it, not Hazard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Lol what? where did you hear all that? Even though his intention was to entice Hazard into that situation it doesn't change the fact that Hazard allowed himself to get into that. The assistant referee should've been left to deal with it, not Hazard.It's all over the internet mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 It's all over the internet mate.Even if that's true - which I have major doubts over - it doesn't change the fact Hazard was in the wrong. The ball-boy was also, but Hazard must be prepared to accept the consequences. The FA will obviously make an example of Hazard, that's wrong, but it's logical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Twat lies on ballHazard tries to wrestle ball from twatTwat still lies on groundHazard toe-pokes ball, little-to-no contact with the twatHazard sent off, looking at a 5-match banMakes sense. Well done, FA. Mufassir08 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 No the boy man drives around in an Audi, is about to inherit a fortune and denied 10-13yo kids who'd kill to be ball boy the chance to be there instead because dad is the director of Swansea. He said on twitter he was gonna waste time; how can you not see he's a spoiled brat who tricked Hazard to get into this situation? Are you daft?And if you find that little poke to get the ball 'taking matters in to your own hands' .. well, let's just say you should probably find another sport to follow. Where are the days football was a man's game?The faggot is a twat, but I cant see how him beign rich affect anything. Also, he was covering for a boy who wouldnt be able to come because of the snow (if we are to believe in the internet).All I am saying is that it is ridiculous for people to start judging him because he is a millionaire. The things he did are disgusting him being poor or not... LDN Blue 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.