Slam Dunk 1,442 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Verdict imminent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubber bullets 1,183 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Banned for four games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Load of bollocksWe should smash up the FA Cup before returning it to them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Four games and 220K fine. Another cowardly decision by the FA, if they think he is guilty then the punishment should be much more, it's obvious they are just trying to cover their fuck up of taking away his arm band when he was innocent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam Dunk 1,442 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Not as bad as we were fearing. 4 game ban and £220k fine which can still be appealed although I suppose the damage was already done after JT quit the national team.But that does seem a large sum of money for a FA fine. Suppose the FA have got to make up the money for taking it to their own hearing in the first place.Edit: The FA statement for anyone that wants to read it.http://www.thefa.com...-september.aspxBasically he can play for CFC for 14 days before appealing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Textbook.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Not to bad expecting worse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Banned for 4 matches and fined 220k.FUCK FA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 4 matches is a decent result. This means he won't play against Arsenal. Wonder how that will work out. I think Cahill is a very good defender and more than adequate replacement and has more pace than Terry. However we could miss his leadership and organisational skills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Nasty feeling because of the Suarez thing it'll be a minimum 4 game ban -on the positive be available to play the goons, and I hope he appeals -and sues the fuckers come to thatHe should Sue the FA. FA bent their own rules to take JT Down in this case. Didnt the panel of Judges consist of the ones chosen by FA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Chelsea Football Club notes and respects today's decision by the Football Association regarding John Terry.We also recognise that John has the right to appeal that decision.It is therefore inappropriate for us to comment further on the matter at this timehttp://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/2931820/title/statement-on-terry-hearing-result Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 John Terry has been found INNOCENT in a court of law.John Terry has been found GUILTY by the F.A.He will be banned for FOUR games, which is only ONE game more than a regular red card. Laughable. (Of course there's the fine too.)The FA are an embarrassment. If you're going to go against the law's decision and decide someone's guilty (wrongly, in my opinion) in your eyes for racism or a racist remark, at least make the punishment a bit more than that. Otherwise there shouldn't be punishment at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea maniac 40 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 4 matches is a decent result. This means he won't play against Arsenal. Wonder how that will work out. I think Cahill is a very good defender and more than adequate replacement and has more pace than Terry. However we could miss his leadership and organisational skills.Yes he will play against Arsenal he has 14 days to make an appeal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Yes he will play against Arsenal he has 14 days to make an appealAh OK Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I think his best option is to wait till after the Arsenal match and accept the charge. He would miss Norwich, Tottenham, and utd both in the PL and League Cup. An appeal could see the ban increased, although I highly doubt it, the verdict was obviously arranged well before the hearing started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.