Frank Lampard

[hjperdeath 2,226]

No, the money is just an irony. I'm sorry to break it for you. but Lampard left Chelsea because he wanted more money. I didn't call him a traitor, I didn't curse him, I didn't call him Judas. I was and I will still be ironic. If you can't stand that, well, sorry. I guess you'll just have to ignore my post or you can continue bitching about them.

Clearly you are his next agent. Left for more money, ha.

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

Agree with the most part, but even Le Tis had an ulterior motive and that was because his folks were in Guernsey

Really? I never knew that but he always seems one of those top guy who truly 'loved' his club, still follow them closely today...etc

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

Clearly you are his next agent. Left for more money, ha.

He probably did, he is getting 100k+ per week atm. If he agreed to stay for lets say 20k, I am sure the club will have considered it. But naaa he earns 5-6 times more elsewhere so why not?

[BlueLyon 9,359]

I wont like him any less because of this, he wrote biggest part of Chelsea history, but I will wonder forever why he did this to Chelsea and their fans. If he wanted top football, he would accept less money and stay here for another season. If he wanted to play, but in smaller league, he could go to Australia. This move to city is showing he doesnt have respect. A player that plays for one club 13 years and then moves to biggest rival at age 36 (which city is atm) is respect-less, no matter how you look at it. Proper chels would retire here, not fuck off to city before end of his career.

And its funny that people say he was ''forced''. When he choose NYC of all clubs in usa, he had talks with people there who told him he will go to city on loan...

Villa also joined NYC but he went to Australia. This move of Lampard to City is simple mocking ob both towards Chelsea, like they would put a fucking finger in Chelsea ass and its unaceptable from Lamps, who is chelsea legend. Disgrace.

He is 36 ffs, why would he make such stupid move right now...I just dont get it. But he is also best player ever to wear Chelsea shirt and its painful seeing him gone to city.

[The Chels 2,502]

Clearly you are his next agent. Left for more money, ha.

You're in denial.

[Jase 43,479]

Have tried not to bother too much about it but seeing Lampard in City attire just feels disgusting!

wtf man, aren't you ban or something!!!

[Rambo 1,729]

Still a Chelsea legend but he's an enemy of ours now. How sweet would it be if drogba scored against them and celebrated in front of city's bench.

[sdrcfc 461]

He made several comments in his interview about this being unexpected and not planning to play in England, perhaps indicating he was unaware that this would happen when he joined NYCFC

[Vybz Kartel 1,613]

Lets be honest, what Lampard did is just not right, its like Raul coming back to La Liga and playing for Atletico, or Totti going to play for Juventus on loan after leaving Roma it just does not feel right no matter the circumstances

[sdrcfc 461]

Lampard says Chelsea didn't want to renew his contract, interesting.

[iseah100 5,612]

Lets be honest, what Lampard did is just not right, its like Raul coming back to La Liga and playing for Atletico, or Totti going to play for Juventus on loan after leaving Roma it just does not feel right no matter the circumstances

Except for City aren't REAL rivals. Title challengers, but hardly rivals.

[zolayes 14,489]

Lampard says Chelsea didn't want to renew his contract, interesting.

I believe neither he nor Ashley were offered reasonable contracts