Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Frank Lampard

DavidEU

By DavidEU,
in Midfielders

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Term-X
Term-X

It’s actually worse than I thought.. Drogba wrote ‘Blue Till I die’ on the dressing room white board and left the country, Ashley Cole rejected Liverpool and left the country. Frank Lampard, the man

Bosnian Blue
Bosnian Blue

He looks like a muppet now. Not winning anything at City while tarnishing his status over here and making New York fans angry. Well that was some decision Frankie.

We Hate Scouse
We Hate Scouse

Genuinely can't believe people are defending him going to our direct rivals for the league. He's going there to train? Yeah because he can't run in America right.

Posted Images

The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted (edited)

See this is where I'm maybe a little old-fashioned but I don't really hate City.

People who would rather a Chelsea legend go to QPR is beyond bewildering. I'm sure these people would be fine with him going to Leeds as well.

It's not nice seeing him in any other shirt but he's a professional footballer. He doesn't owe us a thing because he gave us EVERYTHING he had on the pitch.

Personally I'd rather go to City than QPR as well.

Some of the comments on Twitter are worryingly RAWKish though.

I don't hate City either but I'd much prefer he went to QPR than to our biggest title rivals.

If he's on loan for a season, he'll be part of their trophy celebrations/parades if they win anything. Just the idea of him coming back to the PL in such a 'direct' way is sickening, at least if it's relegation fodder it's not so bad.

I think it's just until March.

Edited by LeChels_
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post!
Term-X

Term-X 7,891

Posted
  • Popular Post!
Posted

Apparently, signing for a team that shares Man City colors, owners, finances, etc is completely different than signing to Man City.

Naive people.

It is.. yes, because one club is in fucking-america and the other is in our own backyard who also happen to be direct rivals...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rantdeville

rantdeville 195

Posted
Posted

City, huh? Weird. Gotta be a financial ploy. Maybe they're paying him what he wants. If he just wanted to keep himself fit, couldn't he have just stayed with us and trained with the first team like Henry did his first year with Red Bulls in off season and I think Beckham did in the Galaxy off season?

My bad all, I neglected to realize that the two teams are jointly owned by the same people. Makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted
Apparently, signing for a team that shares Man City colors, owners, finances, etc is completely different than signing to Man City. Naive people.

How's that naive? In the first instance he's not playing for a direct rival of ours whilst in the second instance he is. That's a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Korea

Korea 734

Posted
Posted

City, huh? Weird. Gotta be a financial ploy. Maybe they're paying him what he wants. If he just wanted to keep himself fit, couldn't he have just stayed with us and trained with the first team like Henry did his first year with Red Bulls in off season and I think Beckham did in the Galaxy off season?

My bad all, I neglected to realize that the two teams are jointly owned by the same people. Makes sense.

How's that naive? In the first instance he's not playing for a direct rival of ours whilst in the second instance he is. That's a big difference.

They dont start until 2015...

Where would man city owners want their signings to play for? Im sure both lampard/villa knew beforehand that they was a good chance they would be going to man city for a bit before the mls season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rantdeville

rantdeville 195

Posted
Posted

They dont start until 2015...

Where would man city owners want their signings to play for? Im sure both lampard/villa knew beforehand that they was a good chance they would be going to man city for a bit before the mls season.

Ya, I realized that after the fact. I meant to write "Edit:.." In there to bring that to light. It makes sense to keep your assets tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stats

Stats 7,053

Posted
Posted

Apparently, signing for a team that shares Man City colors, owners, finances, etc is completely different than signing to Man City.

Naive people.

That word describes yourself. That is a ridiculous comment. I am not going to explain why because others already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted

They dont start until 2015...

Where would man city owners want their signings to play for? Im sure both lampard/villa knew beforehand that they was a good chance they would be going to man city for a bit before the mls season.

David Villa is going on loan at Melbourne City. Man City was not Frank's only option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Korea

Korea 734

Posted
Posted

That word describes yourself. That is a ridiculous comment. I am not going to explain why because others already have.

Yes, I'm naive to think that signing for NYCFC is completely irrelevant to Man City.....

David Villa is going on loan to Melbourne City. Man City was not Frank's only option.

Villa will link up with Melbourne, who are also bankrolled by Premier League champions Manchester City, on loan until December before returning to New York for the club's debut season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The only place to be

The only place to be 11,313

Posted
Posted

David Villa is going on loan to Melbourne City. Man City was not Frank's only option.

Frank has a young family. There's a massive difference between the commute to Melbourne and New York.

He's a professional footballer. These things happen and whilst it's shit it's not a reason to bash a genuine legend of this club. Gotta laugh at City having to sign aged legends from other teams though because they've got none of their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post!
Pizy

Pizy 18,368

Posted
  • Popular Post!
Posted

Yes, I'm naive to think that signing for NYCFC is completely irrelevant to Man City.....

Villa will link up with Melbourne, who are also bankrolled by Premier League champions Manchester City, on loan until December before returning to New York for the club's debut season.

Who cares if he goes to a team bankrolled by one of our rivals? We don't want him to actually go TO one of our rivals.

Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter