🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Frank Lampard

[super_frank8 186]

Jesus.....plastic fan trying too hard.

& yet, though you believe in your delusional shroud of blissful ignorance that once again you have prevailed in your conquests as the all-seeing all-knowledgable super-fan that you claim to be - in reality, you have only managed to prove everything I have said in that post to be even more accurate than it already was. Cheers mate

[super_frank8 186]

Yes, but if its just walls and walls of text that don't really bring anything new to the discussion, then sorry but after about 5 posts it does start getting tiring on the eyes. Sometimes shorter, snappy posts that tend to put the point across with just a little bit more detail can speak more then a 1,000 words. Quality over quantity as my History teacher said to me.

Great to see that you actually learnt something in school - does surprise me a little, not going to lie.

But honestly, if you are claiming that your posts are in any way, shape or form qualitatively superior to my posts, purely because they are presented in a more concise & simple manner - then I think you should seriously consider whether you were actually learning something in that teacher's class - or just sucking him off all day.

Look, if I have something on my mind, then I'm going to say it - & the way I write is pretty much exactly the way that I would want to say it to your face - I'm not going to cut it down to intrinsic nibblet-sized terms just so my 'big words' don't exhaust your poor little eyes.

If a few paragraphs of perfectly coherent & comprehendable relatively well-punctuated text is too much for you to digest within a few minutes, then I can't possibly bear to imagine what kind of torturous ordeal you must have to endure when you are forced to sit down & read an actual book. I'm shuddering at the mere thought of such inhumane horror. My sympathies are definitely with you there mate.

As for the rest - see my last massive wall of text if you think that it might not strain your eyes quite as much as it will your brain.

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

Great to see that you actually learnt something in school - does surprise me a little, not going to lie.

But honestly, if you are claiming that your posts are in any way, shape or form qualitatively superior to my posts, purely because they are presented in a more concise & simple manner - then I think you should seriously consider whether you were actually learning something in that teacher's class - or just sucking him off all day.

Look, if I have something on my mind, then I'm going to say it - & the way I write is pretty much exactly the way that I would want to say it to your face - I'm not going to cut it down to intrinsic nibblet-sized terms just so my 'big words' don't exhaust your poor little eyes.

If a few paragraphs of perfectly coherent & comprehendable relatively well-punctuated text is too much for you to digest within a few minutes, then I can't possibly bear to imagine what kind of torturous ordeal you must have to endure when you are forced to sit down & read an actual book. I'm shuddering at the mere thought of such inhumane horror. My sympathies are definitely with you there mate.

As for the rest - see my last massive wall of text if you think that it might not strain your eyes quite as much as it will your brain.

Wow, you really are the personification of grace and intelligence as you ingeniously make laughable attempts at using insults as it in anyway makes you sound rational and clear headed .

Seriously you take things way too seriously that its becoming laughable, all I said was that you can make points and opinions without trying to use much words as possible, no need to go on another rampage about superior you are. I suggest you go for a lie down and come back when your feeling better.

Anyway we are getting way off topic. This is the Frank Lampard thread, not a thread about your ego. Probably best I stop posting on this thread for a while so I stop contributing with your unhealthy behavior.

[The only place to be 11,313]

& yet, though you believe in your delusional shroud of blissful ignorance that once again you have prevailed in your conquests as the all-seeing all-knowledgable super-fan that you claim to be - in reality, you have only managed to prove everything I have said in that post to be even more accurate than it already was. Cheers mate

Still trying too hard.

[Liquidator 5,176]

Good to know you can give detail in an argument on a forum and get called a plastic for it

[Rmpr 8,977]

Good to know you can give detail in an argument on a forum and get called a plastic for it

Yeah, I do think @super_frank8 posts are a bit long and pationate (he could do them in 800 words instead of 1100), but if he thinks it is necessary to be somewhat repetitive to make his opinion clear, I dont see a problem.

He has some valid points and just because some members are lazy to read and counter argument, they think they have the right to call him by names.

[Changingman_2000 876]

Tommy Langley was on talkSPORT this morning, stressing that the club must do all that they can to keep Cole, Lampard and Terry. Very much the fabric of the club but both sides need to be willing to be flexible when it comes to wedge. Lamps and Cole are naturally fit blokes who I think could carry on for a least the next couple of years.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Jesus.....plastic fan trying too hard.

All opinions and members are valued the same here, no one is better than anyone else. This kind of talk is not welcomed on this forum. Who do you think you are to actually rate a fan?!

[super_frank8 186]

Nawww don't mind him & his grade A insults.

He is the self-proclaimed King of The Bridge - does what he wants, says what he wants - & anyone else who tries to do the same in opposition of his views is inevitably an inferior fan compared to himself.

His opinion is the only one that actually matters, because of course he is only 'thinking about what's in the club's best interests' - so there is clearly no point in bothering to attempt to reason with him & provide a perspective of your own in a discussion unless it is in complete compliance with his beliefs - because otherwise it is declared entirely redundant.

All hail the king!

[RedWhite&BLUE 37]

I want Lampard to stay. I think it would do everyone involved some good to see who the next manager is going to be. Who knows, they could find Lampard indispensable.

At the same time one of the hard parts of honoring your Legend's is allowing them to leave on their own terms. If Lampard wants starting football in a developing market like the USA, then we should honor that choice.

Besides, it's only a matter of time before he would return to CFC in some capacity. Same as Drogba, he is a blue through and through.

[super_frank8 186]

Wow, you really are the personification of grace and intelligence as you ingeniously make laughable attempts at using insults as it in anyway makes you sound rational and clear headed .

Seriously you take things way too seriously that its becoming laughable, all I said was that you can make points and opinions without trying to use much words as possible, no need to go on another rampage about superior you are. I suggest you go for a lie down and come back when your feeling better.

Anyway we are getting way off topic. This is the Frank Lampard thread, not a thread about your ego. Probably best I stop posting on this thread for a while so I stop contributing with your unhealthy behavior.

Well contrary to what you seem to be suggesting about my 'rampage', I never once mentioned any kind of superiority I may possess in direct relation to you - though it is now becoming more obvious what that may be - I was merely stating that you clearly fail to understand what the terms qualitative & quantitative actually allude to. You were trying to be a smartarse about it with the backhanded comments first, so I'm not sure why you seem so surprised at my reciprocation.

& any actual insults were in direct reference to your complaints about the length of my posts & the fact that you have & continue to pretty much disregard them entirely in an attempt to belittle my opinion - since you seem to be incapable of actually providing a valid argument & evidence of your own when I present my responses.

But once again, I am certainly not going to censor my mind purely because you find significant difficulty in processing my lengthy posts. Sure, they could be shorter & more concise - but I don't really see why they have to be when they are only conceived with the objective of fully addressing your own posts - & nor why they should be considering I'm certainly not looking to do you any particular favours following the manner in which this discussion has unfolded.

Taking things seriously? Well yes, I do take them rather seriously if they involve personal agendas against myself - & possibly even more so when it involves my club & the greatest player that has ever been at the Bridge. Everything I have stated in these posts has nothing to do with anything as simplistic as my 'ego' - it is only due to the way in which you have made derogatory statements against myself, my posts & Lamps himself, that I have been forced to respond to them.

If you actually bothered to read some of what I have posted, then you would find that I have been attempting to discuss Frank's situation in as rational a manner as anyone could - I have provided numerous justifications for all of my points throughout the last few pages, & the only reason I have had to reiterate many of them as you so love to point out, is largely due to the fact that you choose to simply ignore the majority of what I have written & dismiss it as nothing but 'babbling'. & so I have to attempt to convey my thoughts once again from a different angle, resulting in yet another of those essays that you so dread. Yet you attempt to portray this as some kind of moral victory since you are so much more simplistic in your argument that you don't even have to respond to what I have said at all - & you are under the illusion that it somehow discredits my own opinion & makes you automatically correct? Seriously mate, you need to have a sit down with that history teacher of yours...

I am really left with no choice but to feel mildly offended by this. & the fact that you continue with doing so is only ever going to provoke a response from me - did you really think I was going to just have a little cry about it & fuck off? In case you haven't realised, you & your friend were the ones to derail this thread into a barage of cheap shots almost purely due to the fact that you both couldn't be bothered to read my own posts, let alone form any kind of genuine response to them.

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

Well contrary to what you seem to be suggesting about my 'rampage', I never once mentioned any kind of superiority I may possess in direct relation to you - though it is now becoming more obvious what that may be - I was merely stating that you clearly fail to understand what the terms qualitative & quantitative actually allude to. You were trying to be a smartarse about it with the backhanded comments first, so I'm not sure why you seem so surprised at my reciprocation.

& any actual insults were in direct reference to your complaints about the length of my posts & the fact that you have & continue to pretty much disregard them entirely in an attempt to belittle my opinion - since you seem to be incapable of actually providing a valid argument & evidence of your own when I present my responses.

But once again, I am certainly not going to censor my mind purely because you find significant difficulty in processing my lengthy posts. Sure, they could be shorter & more concise - but I don't really see why they have to be when they are only conceived with the objective of fully addressing your own posts - & nor why they should be considering I'm certainly not looking to do you any particular favours following the manner in which this discussion has unfolded.

Taking things seriously? Well yes, I do take them rather seriously if they involve personal agendas against myself - & possibly even more so when it involves my club & the greatest player that has ever been at the Bridge. Everything I have stated in these posts has nothing to do with anything as simplistic as my 'ego' - it is only due to the way in which you have made derogatory statements against myself, my posts & Lamps himself, that I have been forced to respond to them.

If you actually bothered to read some of what I have posted, then you would find that I have been attempting to discuss Frank's situation in as rational a manner as anyone could - I have provided numerous justifications for all of my points throughout the last few pages, & the only reason I have had to reiterate many of them as you so love to point out, is largely due to the fact that you choose to simply ignore the majority of what I have written & dismiss it as nothing but 'babbling'. & so I have to attempt to convey my thoughts once again from a different angle, resulting in yet another of those essays that you so dread. Yet you attempt to portray this as some kind of moral victory since you are so much more simplistic in your argument that you don't even have to respond to what I have said at all - & you are under the illusion that it somehow discredits my own opinion & makes you automatically correct? Seriously mate, you need to have a sit down with that history teacher of yours...

I am really left with no choice but to feel mildly offended by this. & the fact that you continue with doing so is only ever going to provoke a response from me - did you really think I was going to just have a little cry about it & fuck off? In case you haven't realised, you & your friend were the ones to derail this thread into a barage of cheap shots almost purely due to the fact that you both couldn't be bothered to read my own posts, let alone form any kind of genuine response to them.

This will be my last post concerning you, because frankly you are completely boring now.

Concerning the length of your post, my only problem is that for the most part their are chunks that seem to be not needed and don't need to be put under your seemingly high standards of replies have to respond to every single line of your posts (which bearing in mind I was not the first person to bring this up). t was YOU that started to kick up a massive fuss over a little bit of criticism. It was YOU that tried to make weak and pathetic attempts to try and insult my intelligence and apparent lack of skill of taking in information. You say that you were not going to cry about it, but sometimes act like a five year old that has been told no and seem to act like the crime of the century was committed because someone did not speak about your precious Lampard in a 100% positive manner. You can not exactly take the moral high ground when ii comes to starting insults when your original post that started this stupid debate called the so called ''doubters'' ''plastic pieces of shit''.

Like I said, you bore me to tears now and this debate will just go and on of insults flying around. Goodbye, merry Christmas and lay off the whiskey.

[Madmax 9,219]

[Spike 12,049]

I like it when he kicks the ball really hard and it ends up in the back of the net because its going so fast and the keeper can't even see it coming because it's going so fast.

Among other childlike things.

[OneMoSalah 8,886]

What is everyone arguing for, its Christmasm eve lighten up for fuck sake!

[Naked Mole Rat 437]

Christmasm.

[Spike 12,049]

What is everyone arguing for, its Christmasm eve lighten up for fuck sake!

Christmasm Day in Australia.

[OneMoSalah 8,886]

Christmasm Day in Australia.

Well Merry farckin Xmas to ya from your main man 'Arry Redknapp have a t'rrfic day

That was random but yeah merry xmas!

[Yasser 63]

GUTTED Frank Lampard has been told by his beloved Chelsea: Find yourself another club.

Blues legend Lamps scored a 25-yard belter and got a standing ovation from the Stamford Bridge faithful as he skippered his team to a stunning 8-0 victory over Aston Villa last Sunday.

But the 34-year-old has been told his Blues career is over and that he can find a new team on January 1.

A Stamford Bridge insider confirmed: “Frank is absolutely distraught.

“He wants to keep playing for Chelsea but they’ve told him to find another club in the January transfer window. He can’t believe it. All he wants to do is play for Chelsea. This club means everything to him.”

But that loyalty is lost on the ruthless Blues, who are unmoved by Lampard’s dozen years of loyal service.

During that time he has helped Chelsea to the Champions League, three Premier League titles, four FA Cups and two League Cups.

Lampard’s contract is up in the summer and he was hoping his displays on the field would persuade the club he was worth keeping. But the England midfielder was told BEFORE Sunday’s mauling of Villa that he could go.

Our source added: “Frank worships the club — and especially the fans — and would happily have seen out his career at Stamford Bridge.

“After everything he has done for Chelsea, he cannot believe the way the club are throwing him out so callously.

“Anyone who saw his performance against Aston Villa will know he should be the first name on the team sheet.

“To think he went into that game knowing the club don’t want him and then to play the way he did tells you what an unbelievable professional Frank is.”

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4713201/Frank-Lampard-told-to-find-a-new-club-by-Chelsea.html

In fact in every day and every moment i read the news about Lamps and Ash and the non-renewal of the contract with them, I just keep ask myself "Roman What you are doing?" really at the end of the season Frankie and Ash will be leave and bring some young f***ing players!!

And also I am keep asking myself how will be reaction the fans in the event of non-renewal and let them leave?!!

What do you think?

UP CHELS!

[Sheva. 5,373]

Lmao, the Sun.

I can see Lampard leaving in the summer, but definitely not in January, when we will also be without Mikel and have Romeu injured.