Jump to content

Chelsea Sack Andre Villas-Boas


 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually putting Essien on brought us back in the game if you didn't notice. Later on they kept attacking and it is not down to AVB's bad tactic that we failed to score on counters.

The defense he put out is the best what we have at the moment.

Managers job is not only choosing defenders, but make them work as a solid defensive system. It could be the best defenders in the world and the mistakes would still be there.

You must be insulting your own inteligence when you say Essien brought us back to the game, because Sunderland had two huge chances to equalize in final minutes, and not to metion it was Essien for Lampard, while Meireles was still there.

Its getting ridículous, even when the tactics and subs are a mess, someone appear praising everything he did, as I said, you dont need to go that far to show that you support the manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its getting ridículous, even when the tactics and subs are a mess, someone appear praising everything he did, as I said, you dont need to go that far to show that you support the manager.

It's getting ridiculous, even when we play well and win a game, you seem to still criticize every little thing about Chelsea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AVB didn't make the right subs in my opinion, Essien should of came on but for Meireles.

We were pushing for a second goal so why wasn't Sturridge or even Lukaku put on? How is Lukaku even going to get better if he is rotting on our bench?

Bringing Malouda on as well.. for like 10 minutes is pointless or even bringing him on full stop is pointless.

I'm always going to support the manager of this club but he didn't make the right tactical changes in my opinion :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's getting ridiculous, even when we play well and win a game, you seem to still criticize every little thing about Chelsea.

ridiculous is people who are satisfied with our display in the second half, and cant see all wrong things because of a "huge win" against PL giants Sunderland.

and im not criticizing every little thing, i said about a specific bad quality in our "manager", so please, to quote my posts you must come with some good ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Managers job is not only choosing defenders, but make them work as a solid defensive system. It could be the best defenders in the world and the mistakes would still be there.

You must be insulting your own inteligence when you say Essien brought us back to the game, because Sunderland had two huge chances to equalize in final minutes, and not to metion it was Essien for Lampard, while Meireles was still there.

Its getting ridículous, even when the tactics and subs are a mess, someone appear praising everything he did, as I said, you dont need to go that far to show that you support the manager.

I really do not want to argue with you because it's the same as arguining with a wall. I'll tell you again, rewatch the game and you'll notice that when Essien entered the game he got us back on track. When you are only 1 goal up and the game is coming to an end, there's no way you can stop the opposition team attacking you like crazy. I wouldn't have subbed Lampard but I'm not AVB...

Our win would've been much easier against PL giants Sunderland if that idiot Dowd gave us at least 1 penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ridiculous is people who are satisfied with our display in the second half, and cant see all wrong things because of a "huge win" against PL giants Sunderland.

and im not criticizing every little thing, i said about a specific bad quality in our "manager", so please, to quote my posts you must come with some good ideas.

I am satisfied with our display in the second half because we won the game. Because at this moment 3 points are more important than world class performances.

No, but overall (not only after this game) almost every post you've written that I've read is criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you registered 23, october, its really difficult to remember when we played "well enough" since, maybe thats explain.

I've been following this forum for a much longer time though, and atm I do not remember a positive post from you.

Valencia, City, Wolves, Newcastle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't get why he puts on Malouda when we're trying to defend a lead.

Because he plays in Mata's position, played well in his last match, Mata wasn't on top of his game and was tired? Besides, Malouda helps more in defense then Mata.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been following this forum for a much longer time though, and atm I do not remember a positive post from you.

Valencia, City, Wolves, Newcastle...

go search in the fucking forum, before accusing me of only making positive posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he plays in Mata's position, played well in his last match, Mata wasn't on top of his game and was tired? Besides, Malouda helps more in defense then Mata.

He does it every time, and very rarely has it not back fired.

Bring on a freaking defender if you want to defend, not Malouda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You