Spike

Man City 3
Chelsea 8
simple as

I remember why I only post on here once or twice a year. See you in six months. 

I remember why I only post on here once or twice a year. See you in six months. 

That isn't logical or even a worthwhile statistic because it ignores nearly every other fundamental influence on the sport, to look at the sport in such a simple manner is reductive, pointless, and ultimately signals a lack of critical thinking. That is just cause-effect with conjecture. A player can have a good game in a loss, and a bad game in a win. A team sport is typically won and lost through the team, not one player; ergo the only bias here is coming from you.
The information you've completely ignored:
The other ten Chelsea players and subs The eleven opposition plus subs Formation and approach of both teams Chelsea's form Opponet's form injuries fitness 'bUt JoRgiNho PlaYs whEN teAM lOSes' is an argument you should be ashamed of.

Imagine having a bad game occasionally.

Imagine having a bad game occasionally.

Imagine having a bad game occasionally.

Imagine having a bad game occasionally.

Like everyone, I very much approve and enhoy Loftus-Cheek and Hudson-Odoi but to bank on them being starters with their injuries is naive. We aren't even garuanteed them returning to their best abiliites. 

Some absolutely bizarre comments in this thread.

I'll be surprised if Hudson-Odoi amounts to his potential given that his achilles exploded. It'd be very admirable if he recovers 100% but I will hold my breath.

An amazing player, I only hope that he can continue to develope an understanding with Kante next season under whomever is the coach.

You were curious to know how Jorginho fairs as a player when he isn't 'Constricted to Sarri's football'. I showed you an example how he works well for the national side playing in a double pivot. Being one of Italy's more consistent performers. 
We get it. You don't like him. But save it with the confirmation bias. 

An amazing player, I only hope that he can continue to develope an understanding with Kante next season under whomever is the coach.

Some absolutely bizarre comments in this thread.

Oh, Hazard I will miss you. I don't disagree with the move but it doesn't mean I have to approve. England is conquered, the ever consumate professional hungers for new challenges and to step out of a comfort zone is difficult and admirable. 

Oh, Hazard I will miss you. I don't disagree with the move but it doesn't mean I have to approve. England is conquered, the ever consumate professional hungers for new challenges and to step out of a comfort zone is difficult and admirable. 

I regret this thread.

Oh, Hazard I will miss you. I don't disagree with the move but it doesn't mean I have to approve. England is conquered, the ever consumate professional hungers for new challenges and to step out of a comfort zone is difficult and admirable. 

Some absolutely bizarre comments in this thread.

Some absolutely bizarre comments in this thread.

An amazing player, I only hope that he can continue to develope an understanding with Kante next season under whomever is the coach.

I really doubt that. How many coaches could uproot the playing styles and locker rooms of Barcelona, Bayern, and Manchester City? If it were so easy to turn a good team into a great team, then Chelsea wouldn't sack a coach per anum. With a little research it reveals that Bayern was no easy path, they resisted Pep's changes at every turn, and made it difficult to create his own team. They supported him financially to an extent but that's it, he was battling the board for his tenure.
To be marked by greatness one doesn't have to lift minnows to glory. 

Some absolutely bizarre comments in this thread.

I don't know what she does, I don't how she does it, I don't know how much control she has, and I don't care.