Spike

Agbonlahor got three pregnant...at the same time.

I'd aim higher than that Mexican bastard.

More webistes are linking Villa to Chelsea http://www.faniq.com/blog/Chelsea-interested-in-signing-out-of-favor-Barcelona-striker-David-Villa-Blog-57700 http://hereisthecity.com/2012/11/10/chelsea-in-for-david-villa-in-january/ http://www.marca.com/2012/11/09/en/football/barcelona/1352453146.html Who knows...

Option 2 has the better ratio...after 1000 sitters 50 goals are scored. Weird choices.

Stats wise I believe Sandro looks the best, followed by Mikel and by Tioté (hugley disappointed with his pathetic tackle count). I'd say that Mikel does the same as Barry, he knows his role and does that and only that, but I'd have to say that Mikel's role is changed by each manager. Under RDM Mikel has gotton foward more times than he ever did in the previous 5 years. Mikel used to be an attacking player in his youth and RDM may be trying to bring some of those qualities back. He may take a while but he could be quite a good B2B kind of player. Mikel does have a bloody brilliant first touch, I might add.

@, I would never call Yaya Touré a Defensive Midfielder. He is a Box To Box fella much like Essien was/is. ManCity's resident DM is Gareth Barry, so analyse him!

Lest We Forget I actually forgot it was Rememberance Day yesterday until about 8:00pm. But in Australia and New Zealand we have ANZAC Day on April 25 and nobody and I mean nobody forgets that day, it means too much. Australians and the Turks also did that in the Gallipoli campaign but it was in August/September...

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/281343/Chelsea-watch-with-interest-as-David-Villa-edges-towards-Barcelona-exit/

Why would it be perfect for the team? You've explain why he is a good player but you have not explained why he is good for the team. Fellaini at Everton has been playing as a Second Striker or Attacking Midfielder if you will, he is so far up the pitch so often, it's hard to call him anything else. Can he play that role at Chelsea with Oscar, Mata and Hazard all exceling there? Fellaini is almost bringing back the old school 'little man, big man' tactic from the 90s, 80s and 70s.

Yes, but if that applies to seemingly average injuries like Marin's it also holds true to more serious injuries; handicapped people for instance. If a person was born a parapalegic, would you say to them it's their fault because their body has problems? Direct or indirect fault it is still a very harsh statement. You can't hold double standards for these things.

1. That is complete nonsense. He didn't wake up one morning and decide to get injured. For instance: Bogarde did not play because he refused to whereas Marin does not play because he can't. 2. Agreed. 3. Possibly.

Voted for all three.

Nobody said that either. One person mentioned Barcos because he is cheaper, not because Falcao is out of form. Another mentioned Falcao's form has dipped. Nobody has directly said " oh bad run of form, better get someone eles". Bad run of form has been mentioned and buying someone else has been metioned but not in the same post and not by the same poster. Both statements are mutually exlcusive.

Who are they? Giggs was signed from Manchester City. Cleverly was signed from Bradford. I can only think of Fletcher, Evans and Scholes. Two of them relics and the other is an idiot. I guessed three of them. I don't think much of Keane but again I have not seen much of him so my opinion doesn't matter much regarding the subject.

It's on WAGNH too. http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2012/11/9/3622310/sam-hutchinson-will-remain-at-nottingham-forest-chelsea-fc Even if he just a super-sub for the rest of his Chelsea career, I'd still like him here. At this moment in time, I'd trust him over Luiz. Anyway if Ledley King can do it for so many years, I think Hutchinson can.

McEachran has always been at Chelsea. Not many players can say that they made for their very first club. Even Terry started at another club Senrab, which sadly lead to West Ham. Imagine if Hutchinson wasn't so unlucky with injuries, right now we would have three players (McEahran, Chalobah and Hutchinson) that were not signed from another club and had always been at Chelsea. Not many top clubs could say that. If you understand what I'm saying, it doesn't make to much sense read back.

I told you lot this guy is a hack and is a proper cunt. The only player I'd feel hard done by losing us Griezmann.

It's quit simple really: he played well against Chelsea so the collective grew a hard on. It always happens; like when Falcao scored that hat trick, sure people wanted him beforehand but afterwards is when the circle jerk really begain.

You do realise it was a joke? I don't really care what he does with his life. He can go shag Bridge's ex-girlfriend for all I care.

What do you mean face it? What do you mean I'm missing the point? You think I'm in denial don't you? For starters, I never said that the players are above criticism. So that's come out of nowhere. Secondly, I consider shite and a slump to be pretty fucking different. QPR is shite because they are just a terrible team, Chelsea is in a slump. Different. Thirdly, I'm not content with the team's form, but I can appreciate the fact that this is a young team that has been missing it's leaders. I can also appreciate the fact that the team is playing better football than last season. Lastly, 3 wins, 1 loss and 1 draw is a pretty fucking decent record. It's not the most ideal, but it's better than most teams in England. The team has been playing scrappy, but the perfomance doesn't matter, the result does. I'm not trying to offend you or insult you that's not my intention but I am not in the mood for a bullshit internet debate so don't bother quoting me because I won't reply.

His contract expires at the end of next season (I think...don't quote me on that) and I read somewhere that the board came to the conclusion that Villa is expendable. Of course expendable does not equate to transfer listed but I'm just a hopeful bastard rambling to make himself feel better. He costed them quite a lot and has large wages, they could be looking to recoup some of that and focus on youth prospects like Cuenca and Tello. Yep he signed a 4 year contract in 2010. So his contract ends at the end of next season. I doubt they'll resign him and his resale value is higher right now that it will be.

Sometime you have to mix in the old with the new. Look at Arsenal's project from a decade years ago, they sold all their experienced veterans and replaced them with boys. They played good football but they were weak mentally and lacked leadership and experience. I'd hate for Chelsea to turn into that team; the most talented group of players in the league but are too hot and cold to mount any title challenges. Some of you might think "Shut the fuck up, Spike. We aren't those Gooner fucks" but if the club isn't careful it could do that unfortunate road. Don't forget that one Italian player (I forget his name...) was signed when he was 30. I think he was voted Chelsea's greatest ever player...but everything gets lost in time...maybe this guy didn't even exist in the first place.

I sincerely laughed. I think this may be the greatest analogy regarding Torres' time at Chelsea ever.

I haven't seen Lamps and JT start together for a while. I'm having withdrawls.

Atletico Madrid may love Fernando Torres, but to believe they would just straight up take a swap with no cash is insane. They aren't stupid, they know that Falcao is better than Torres and to sanction this deal would be the worst piece of transfer business in the world. And not to mention the fact that Torres earns more than Falcao..