Jump to content

didierforever

Member
  • Posts

    11,770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13
  • Country

    India

Everything posted by didierforever

  1. would love to see this guy in chelsea blue. when i first saw him play for napoli against us in the away leg , i had a premonition that he might be a chelsea player in future. pls let this be our guy.
  2. WHY??? we have got rambo, we have got marin and probaby even kakuta. no need for danny to play as rw. its going to be a loooonnnngggg season and i expect us to play atleast 60 matches in which i think danny will start as a striker in 25 or so matches. no for danny on the right wing.
  3. i dont really care of thread derailing because i simply am not interested. if u can only read my persie comment but simply ignore the big and the major part of my argument in which i have return the whole of the chelsea squad then i feel i have hardly done anything wrong. u read what u wanted to and ignored the main part. returning back to our argument, if we our rich does it mean we simply throw away the money? i am not saying hulk will be useless but not worth it. even 30m is not worth it. plus we need to give torres a leeway. hulk will threaten him whereas sturridge and lukaku will never be given the role of no.1 striker. we let drogba go for this reason (that is what i feel) and bringing hulk would just be stupid. as for right wing we might not have a true right winger but we have got a number of options, rambo, marin,benayoun/malouda, and whhile every1 might forget it but also kakuta.
  4. dude the persie comment was not literal but just for y not this player too if we want that one. the main argument was the squad as i see it right now and it seems a young squad with the right amount of experience and one which can win the league. might even challenge for the defence of cl but i simply cannt see that happen without dd or someone good enough to replace him which is definitely not hulk. so i dont really see y we need a 40m hulk.
  5. y not persie then? i may also add that persie has even proven his worth in pl. we dont need hulk cech (hilario,turnbull) iva luiz terry cole (hutch, cahill, ferreira,bertrand) lamps mikel (meireles, romeu,oscar<maybe>) rambo mata hazard (marin,kakuta,kdb) torres (sturridge.lukaku) if we dont want kakuta then benayoun can play or malouda can complete his deal but 60m/50m/40m/35m is not done. not worth it.
  6. i still cant understand y hulk? people who doubt rambo as a right winger should please refresh their memories by watching our whole season again.
  7. wanna see hazard mata rambo torres start with cameos from lukaku and sturridge.
  8. good squad player but of no use to us. if we actually wanna bring youth players and bring a youth revolution then we simply have to let players like malouda,yossi probably even essien go.
  9. so do u mean to say that we should drop our 4-2-31 which has proved so efficient for us just because some people think rambo is not a good rw. i and i am sure a lot of people would agree that rambo is definitely not suited in the double pivot role. i dont remember him playin once in that position and he simply should not. also against barca the run might have been from the midfield but he was playin as a lw and his run shows that he has the know how of that position, as for his goal he was playin as a rb but his one-twos with lampard were brilliant and so was the finish from the position of a rw. as far as crossing is concerned, who are we gonna cross to now, dd is gone and nando thrives more on thru balls and fast pacy play which rambo can provide, for eg- rambo's quick break against benefica to put torres thru on the wing and torres simply squaring it. rambo is great for the rw role.
  10. pathetic?? really. how easily we forget the guy whose brilliance it was that actually got us thru to the finals. AND IN BOTH THE LEGS. ramires has proven what he can do on the right wing. technique and all can take a hike. when he is not performing we can change but at this moment to even think that rambo would not be our no.1 right winger for either marin/oscar/bryune is an insult to rambo.
  11. even in 4-3-3 he always played on the right and a very forward role. by the way his best moments came on the wings when we were playing 4-2-3-1. the cross to dd against napoli, the square ball to dd against barca from the left wing, and the goal against barca was also from a wide positon.
  12. i dont see y rambo cant play on the right wing. throughout the last season he had proved his worth in that position and got better at it. his tracking back is awesome , his pace is his biggest weapon and he can really hit big teams on the counter whereas if he is playin in a deeper role he cant venture ahead much, his tackling is not that good and same can be said about his range of passing. in short rambo should be our no.1 rw unless marin can prove otherwise.
  13. moses for 10m is too much. he was supposed to be a squad buy and we should have negotiated that way only.
  14. we are expecting way too much of marin and thinking him to be way better than he is. atleast for the 1st epl season rambo will be given preference on the right.
  15. chelsea 2012-13 squad gk- cech, courtoius, dont care. defenders- jt,luiz,cahill,iva,cole,bert,hutchinson, and a right back. midfielders- lampard,mikel,romeu,meireles,josh wingers/cam- mata,marin,rambo,hazard,kdb (he has played cl for genk so i dont see y he needs to go out for loan, loan is to get experience to play at the highest level, kdb has had it), kakuta(deserves a crack) strikers- sturridge, torres, lukaku(we can trust in torres to get back to his best)/a real striker who can score 25 in the season, not right wing makeshift for 40mil. that makes 25.
  16. i heard drogba is coming to india. please tell me if its true or just shitty rumours. also the date of his arrival and everything. i cant miss this oppurtunity to miss "THE BIG MAN"...
  17. as this seems to be the most viewed page on TC these days, so i m posting this here: i heard drogba is coming to india. please tell me if its true or just shitty rumours. also the date of his arrival and everything. i cant miss this oppurtunity to see "THE BIG MAN"...
  18. the interview is on skysports to. u can read it there.
  19. http://football-talk.co.uk/64135/chelsea-rocked-as-ramires-issues-quit-threat/ please dont do that rambo.
  20. HUlk(if he costs us 50m as the reports are suggesting), van der wiel(his defending sucks), modric, felliani.
  21. the guy sucks. we just got rid of a bosingwa, y do we want another one? hutchinson seems much better. bertrand can do the job do(not much idea how good he would be on the right flank). anyways no point in wasting 10mil. please.
  22. oh great... now we got 2 50mil strikers. awesome...
  23. in short what you wanna say is you have reached the ultimate and utmost pinnacle of footballing knowledge while all of us are idiots. right? got your point. now can we idiots have a civilized discussion/debate while you can go somewhere else with your immense bundle of knowledge.
×
×
  • Create New...