didierforever

Real already has CR, bale, james, isco and a very promosing JESE as their 5 AM options. Why exactly would they want reus? Play him where? What they need is a DM. Also how exactly are we a longer shot than arsenal and united?

I like claude. He is realistic. He knows that this arsenal is a piece of shit and what it needs first and foremost is a change of manager, someone with different ideas than mr. Wenger's philosophy of keep attacking when 3-0 up even if it means drawing 3-3.

I really doubt he ll replace GC with a 50mil varane.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/30128792

cant believe people are actually giving this any weight whatsoever. absolute rubbish!!! media bollocks!!!! and that too for 7mil!! LOL. absolute LOL!!! the next thing you ll hear is the media saying that arsenal have upped their bid from 7 to 10mil and we have added hazard to cech for that amount!!!

how can u forget the great kakuta!!!

mikel is NOT matic's replacement. he was not the starter last season when his only competition was a 36 year old lamps and rambo, so why would he suddenly go ahead of rambo in the pecking order. but i agree that mikel is a decent squad player who has some value to the team especially in closing out the game.

reus is not being sold to generate funds, he is being sold to prevent him from going directly to bayern. bvb have been bitten once by lewa, they dont want to repeat the same mistake with reus.

i dont like messi. i am glad we have the french messi and the german messi out on loan. i hope we sell/loan out the egyptian messi too.

and we ll be stuck with salah. what a nice thing to hope!!!

rambo is a sure shot starter for any big match that we play in. be it city away or pool away, i dont see him getting any reds there. mikel-cesc pivot will be same as lamps-mikel pivot. there is simply no legs and workrate in that pivot. mikel's calmness is needed in the last 20 mins, not when we are trying to force the issue in the earlier stages of the natch.

i dont think. if matic gets injured, we will play a cesc-rambo pivot for sure. mikel has time and again shown that he is there only for a certain role. cesc-rambo pivot will be very close to the lamps-rambo pivot, but a pivot of cesc-mikel will be an absolute disaster. there is absolutely no legs and workrate in that pivot. they will be over-run very easily (pretty much like the mikel-lamps pivot).

we have rambo for that. infact he is a wonderful replacement.

cant find any source! link?

corrected!!!

would be absolutely fantastic if we bought him for 20mil and sold salah for 5-10mil. would be perfect, and then in the summer we can sell schurrle if he still continues to underperform.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

I just don't get what u meant to say with these?Ukreuters man... I gave u a link to that. Cant get any surer than that. Believe me. As for thw 2nd part, I know he lost the copa del ray final. I know he went trophyless. Please read my previous post, I said, knowing that he would leave RM would not have made him not fight for the trophy. The fact that he knew he wad leaving RM would not have affected his professionalism. I am out, dude. Totally out.

Do u know what the add ons are? If they were triggered or not? And this is after we accept that there might have been add ons which is not sure. So the very acceptable trabsfer fee of salah is 11 mil not 16 mil.Neymarnd salah are 2 completeky different cases. It has been proveb that neynar's transfer fee was 86.2mil. There are no ifs and buts there.http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11833/9175433/primera-division-barcelona-charged-with-tax-fraud-over-neymar-signing http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKBREA0N1KV20140124?irpc=932 http://www.espnfc.com/spanish-primera-divisi%C3%B3n/story/1691847/barcelona-details-neymars-862m-euro-deal http://www.goal.com/en-us/news/88/spain/2014/01/24/4568220/figures-show-neymar-cost-barcelona-862-million-euro As for jose, he knew he was out of RM and into chelsea in february. That dint stop him from taking rm into semis of CL and finals of copa del ray. Infact RM playef ATM on 17th may 2013, in the copa final. Do u think jose would not have done everything possible to make RM win the trophy nd not go trophyless. Jose is a proper professional if nothing else.

Where does it say anything about salah's transfer fee to be 16mil. Give me a proper and decent reputable source. Not a bbc:source writing but a proper article. I can give you atleast 10-15 reputable sources saying its 11mil. That's it. Most of us while discussing salah use the 11mil number as his fee. Dude, jose was in bernabaue on that day. On the 1st of june he was there. How many other ways can I say that. Here is a video of it. Jose Mourinho says goodbye to Real Madrid FANS: http://youtu.be/T4bXrWNJY8Q Unless he has a clone then JOSE MOURINHO WAS IN BERNABAUE ON 1ST JUNE 2013 wheb RM played osasuna.

bbc says 11, sky says 11. http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/9129922/transfer-news-chelsea-agree-deal-for-mohamed-salah-with-basel http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25868272 telegraph, mirror, mail all say 11. but one transfermarkt article proofs that his transfer fee is 16 mil. here is another one http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/mohamed-salah-11-5-mil-amp-pound-chelsea-fc-/thread/forum/357/thread_id/1134 but let me not break your delusions and hallucinations. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1658609-jose-mourinho-leaves-real-madrid-for-chelsea-with-head-held-high 1st june, jose was in bernabaeu.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25868272 http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/23814060 salah - 11 mil willian - 30mil seriously dude, know SOMETHING about stuff that you are posting. you said that we wanted to buy neymar but bought schurrle. since clearly, our whole transfer targets are defined by jose, i would be very suprised to know when exactly jose singled out neymar despite chelsea having hopeless strikers and no quality DM/CMs. also, jose mourinho was STILL the coach of RM when they played their last match of the season on 1st june 2013, against osasuna, so "LONG before" was what, 2 days? like i said, we were never in for neymar in that window.

salah - 11 mil after selling mata and kdb, in desperate need of a RW. willian -30 mil which were kept aside to buy a striker (rooney) but in the last moment, used to bought willian cos he fit the system more compared to mata. also both of this is hardly "crazy money". neymar - 80+mil, transfer fee. joins barca on 3rd june 2013 after announcing that he would join barca on 27th may 2013. jose mourinho joins chelsea on 3rd june 2013. u sir, have been found lying!!!!

tell me a transfer under jose whers we have done that. We have come a long long way from 2010 winter. AGAIN, if u think jose was willing to splash 80+mil on neymar despite having clear striker problem and CM/DM problems, and desptite having hazard, oscar, mata, kdb, mosesas his AM options, well what can i say!!!

Ohk. So pirlo praises sterling cos they are bith nike-nike. But neymar ans his father and the whole barca board who have anyways done all kind of transfer crap are the most reliable sources. Also, if you think we were willing to pay 80+mil for neymar, you have anither thing coming your way.Also the thing about "it was not about negotiation should have nade u understand a thing or 2. The fact that 40mil went to his father was definitelt not a part of negotiation.