didierforever
Everything posted by didierforever
-
i dont like messi. i am glad we have the french messi and the german messi out on loan. i hope we sell/loan out the egyptian messi too.
-
and we ll be stuck with salah. what a nice thing to hope!!!
-
rambo is a sure shot starter for any big match that we play in. be it city away or pool away, i dont see him getting any reds there. mikel-cesc pivot will be same as lamps-mikel pivot. there is simply no legs and workrate in that pivot. mikel's calmness is needed in the last 20 mins, not when we are trying to force the issue in the earlier stages of the natch.
-
i dont think. if matic gets injured, we will play a cesc-rambo pivot for sure. mikel has time and again shown that he is there only for a certain role. cesc-rambo pivot will be very close to the lamps-rambo pivot, but a pivot of cesc-mikel will be an absolute disaster. there is absolutely no legs and workrate in that pivot. they will be over-run very easily (pretty much like the mikel-lamps pivot).
-
we have rambo for that. infact he is a wonderful replacement.
-
cant find any source! link?
-
corrected!!!
-
would be absolutely fantastic if we bought him for 20mil and sold salah for 5-10mil. would be perfect, and then in the summer we can sell schurrle if he still continues to underperform.
-
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
-
I just don't get what u meant to say with these?Ukreuters man... I gave u a link to that. Cant get any surer than that. Believe me. As for thw 2nd part, I know he lost the copa del ray final. I know he went trophyless. Please read my previous post, I said, knowing that he would leave RM would not have made him not fight for the trophy. The fact that he knew he wad leaving RM would not have affected his professionalism. I am out, dude. Totally out.
-
Do u know what the add ons are? If they were triggered or not? And this is after we accept that there might have been add ons which is not sure. So the very acceptable trabsfer fee of salah is 11 mil not 16 mil.Neymarnd salah are 2 completeky different cases. It has been proveb that neynar's transfer fee was 86.2mil. There are no ifs and buts there.http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11833/9175433/primera-division-barcelona-charged-with-tax-fraud-over-neymar-signing http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKBREA0N1KV20140124?irpc=932 http://www.espnfc.com/spanish-primera-divisi%C3%B3n/story/1691847/barcelona-details-neymars-862m-euro-deal http://www.goal.com/en-us/news/88/spain/2014/01/24/4568220/figures-show-neymar-cost-barcelona-862-million-euro As for jose, he knew he was out of RM and into chelsea in february. That dint stop him from taking rm into semis of CL and finals of copa del ray. Infact RM playef ATM on 17th may 2013, in the copa final. Do u think jose would not have done everything possible to make RM win the trophy nd not go trophyless. Jose is a proper professional if nothing else.
-
Where does it say anything about salah's transfer fee to be 16mil. Give me a proper and decent reputable source. Not a bbc:source writing but a proper article. I can give you atleast 10-15 reputable sources saying its 11mil. That's it. Most of us while discussing salah use the 11mil number as his fee. Dude, jose was in bernabaue on that day. On the 1st of june he was there. How many other ways can I say that. Here is a video of it. Jose Mourinho says goodbye to Real Madrid FANS: http://youtu.be/T4bXrWNJY8Q Unless he has a clone then JOSE MOURINHO WAS IN BERNABAUE ON 1ST JUNE 2013 wheb RM played osasuna.
-
bbc says 11, sky says 11. http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/9129922/transfer-news-chelsea-agree-deal-for-mohamed-salah-with-basel http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25868272 telegraph, mirror, mail all say 11. but one transfermarkt article proofs that his transfer fee is 16 mil. here is another one http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/mohamed-salah-11-5-mil-amp-pound-chelsea-fc-/thread/forum/357/thread_id/1134 but let me not break your delusions and hallucinations. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1658609-jose-mourinho-leaves-real-madrid-for-chelsea-with-head-held-high 1st june, jose was in bernabaeu.
-
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25868272 http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/23814060 salah - 11 mil willian - 30mil seriously dude, know SOMETHING about stuff that you are posting. you said that we wanted to buy neymar but bought schurrle. since clearly, our whole transfer targets are defined by jose, i would be very suprised to know when exactly jose singled out neymar despite chelsea having hopeless strikers and no quality DM/CMs. also, jose mourinho was STILL the coach of RM when they played their last match of the season on 1st june 2013, against osasuna, so "LONG before" was what, 2 days? like i said, we were never in for neymar in that window.
-
salah - 11 mil after selling mata and kdb, in desperate need of a RW. willian -30 mil which were kept aside to buy a striker (rooney) but in the last moment, used to bought willian cos he fit the system more compared to mata. also both of this is hardly "crazy money". neymar - 80+mil, transfer fee. joins barca on 3rd june 2013 after announcing that he would join barca on 27th may 2013. jose mourinho joins chelsea on 3rd june 2013. u sir, have been found lying!!!!
-
tell me a transfer under jose whers we have done that. We have come a long long way from 2010 winter. AGAIN, if u think jose was willing to splash 80+mil on neymar despite having clear striker problem and CM/DM problems, and desptite having hazard, oscar, mata, kdb, mosesas his AM options, well what can i say!!!
-
Ohk. So pirlo praises sterling cos they are bith nike-nike. But neymar ans his father and the whole barca board who have anyways done all kind of transfer crap are the most reliable sources. Also, if you think we were willing to pay 80+mil for neymar, you have anither thing coming your way.Also the thing about "it was not about negotiation should have nade u understand a thing or 2. The fact that 40mil went to his father was definitelt not a part of negotiation.
-
fine. my mistake. so now tell me HOW WAS SCHURRLE A NEYMAR REPLACEMENT IF WE WANTED TO BUY NEYMAR IN 2010 AND BOUGHT SCHURRLE IN 2013!!!!!! PRAY TELL ME!!!
-
neymar was warned by pele to not join chelsea when we were looking to buy him in 2012, and then we bought hazard. show me a single link where we were in the race to buy neymar for 80+mil. like i said, get your facts right. schurrle did not replace neymar. those were 2 completely different transfers in different windows. atleast know what u r speaking of. so messi should join stoke and win the PL? i am not comparing messi and sterling here but your stupid argument makes no sense. i dont care how good pool is. I AM SAYING THEY ARE A PIECE OF SHIT!!! but expecting a 19 year old to make up for a WC player like suarez and a very good striker like sturridge is right on idiotic. even then, sterling has been there best player by a mile. oh dear god!!!! what has pool's 11th place got to do with how good sterling is? u know what, forget it. not worth it!!!
-
We wanted to buy neymar and we bought hazard. Get your facts right. During the season in which neymar went to barca, we wete not even in the race. Also, please don't say such poor arguments.If spurs replaced bale effectively, I feel they should still be improving. But rather, thwy have had their manager fired, the second one on its way and in a total mess, don't know how u think they have replaced bale effectivwly. Balo the best young CF in thw world. Another no comments here. From a CL winning inter to a PL winning city to a dwindling ac to the current pool. Definitely the best yiung CF in the world. Who the hell cares if pool is a one season wonder or a bunch of world xlass players playinf together. Did I say anything about pool. Why do u feel the need to bring then up. The point is about sterlinf the player. Who without a shred of doubt is one of the best prospects in the world.
-
hummels has been in and out, subotic has not been better, and yet you are judging durm on exactly what? FIFA? i dont know who u talk to, but 99.99% of people saw mignolet for who he was. a good shot stopper but terrible at cross handling. balo is not a bad player, but he is no where near a WC player. if not for his "antics" he would have been a nothing by now. we were linked with markovic and yet we bought salah, goes on to tell his class. moreno has shown on multiple occasions how circumspect he can be defensively. if you actually saw spurs, u would not say they replaced bale well. infact replacing is not only for a season. the impact of the buys last for a longer time. look at them now. they are a mess. and mainly that is cos of their terrible buys. . no comments.
-
so now we are comparing a defence of hummels, piszcek and subotic/papawhatever to blacket, mcnair, rojo and even the likes of smalling and evans. well, if you think sterling has "sucked" this season, then we should not have anymore debate. everyone here must be an idiot to think otherwise. is investing the suarez money into players like lambert, balo and can, markovic, etc etc etc supposed to be a point in your favor or mine. YOU CANT REPLACE A WORLD CLASS PLAYER WHO SCORED 31 LEAGUE GOALS BY BUYING A BUNCH OF AVERAGE PLAYERS. spurs made that mistake and now pool have made the same mistake. so by your definition, CR and bale should also be called "pacewhores". sterling did do the same for england. read what pirlo said about him after the italy game. it was not his fault that england are a shit team and gerrard forgot that suarez was playing on the other team. no one is talking about stats here. people are talking about sterling the player. and he without a doubt is one of the best prospects in the footballing world.
-
Sakho started over varane for france in WC. that makes him better?I said one of the best and when you are already comparing him with the likes of alaba, that kinda proves that he is a very good player. Also u think durm is better than shaw? Have u seen bvb in the league? Shambolic defensively. Liverpool not having any expectation has nothing to do with this. Sterling has still been there best player. Heads and shoulders above all the others. He was england's best player in the WC by a mile. Kyle walker and joe hart dint have RM looking at thw m. English media overhypes each and wvery young player, but stwrling is a gem. If your only argument against hin is that the others too were overrated and that he is a player on the same level as kyle walker then I can't help you. Also, sterling is under scrutint playing for a team that is curently missing 50+ goals from the previous season, are still playing gerrard as DM, have replaced suarez with lambert and balo and have a laughable defence and is yet able to put in good performances. I mean pool lost 2-1 to us, but how was sterling on the day? I think he was very good. There onlt threat.
-
He will cost 40mil to basically sit on the bench. Of we hadn't bought cesc, he would have been an awesome buy. What we need is a pacy RW not anotger play maker as a winger.He is amazing but not needed.
-
Wilmots is an idiot.
