didierforever
MemberEverything posted by didierforever
-
whose top of the table? plastic!!
-
hope mikel performs well.
-
think today our "invincible" tag might be in big danger. hoping mikel puts in a brilliant shift. thats the only way i see us winning the game!!! if rambo is fit, i think he will play as a RW to provide that extra cover and legs in the mid which we will definitely lack in a pivot of cesc and mikel. courtois iva GC JT azpi cesc mikel rambo oscar hazard costa
-
no rambo will be a MASSIVE miss. can see us losing with a pivot of cesc and mikel.
-
dear mother of GOD!!!!!
-
facebook, twitter, media and now talk chelsea too. messi vs CR in the "english football thread".. great!!!!!
-
so does his wife. probably the daughter takes after the mother.
-
441 minutes without conceding a goal and to be honest, the CAN goal was something that simply was unavoidable. this back4 is solid!!!!!!!!!
-
after watching their game against spurs, i will be shocked if they are even competitive. defensively they look shit and i think ageuro will have a field day!!!
-
I can already see the melt down after we drop points this weekend and city close the gap a little. Tough game. Very tough game.
-
there is a massive difference between critisizing and insulting. and that is what those people did. i dint quote people who wanted DD to not start, cos that would have been more than half the forum and me too. http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/19373-chelsea-v-tottenham/?p=1018367 this is the team i wanted to start. but i can also see why jose would start DD over a remy who has not played football in a month or more, would be lacking match fitness compared to DD who is the big man for big occasion. the people i quoted said thing like "jose must be a MORON to start DD", or that "playing DD is letting teams off the hook" like he is some semi professional good-for-nothing player (or torres) or that DD is a "grandpa" and one of the posters was "happy that the grandpa is injured". and if they have the balls to say such things to 2 massive legends of the club, then they should be ready to face the counter criticism too.
-
There is a reason why he is a legend!!! There is a reason why he is the king!!!!
-
go to the oscar thread and show me the last post i have made about him. you ll be suprised!!!
-
how many balls did our midfielders play behind the defence for DD? just like today's instance where a ball was played behind the spurs defence and DD took towards the left wing, held it up and brought one of our CAMs into the game. our midfield was ineffective that day. fellaini did a proper JOB on cesc. it was not a striker issue.
-
i am going to let the MODS deal with this one. @CHOULO19 as for the non-abusing part of the post, i dont have a problem with people having a problem with team selection. go to the match thread and see for yourself how many people dint want DD to start.did i do it for everyone? http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/19373-chelsea-v-tottenham/?p=1018367 this is the team i myself wanted to play. i had expected remy to start myself. so your whole agenda about me saying "i told you so" is as stupid as you. do you get it now? its about expressing it. its about giving our legend and our manager their respect and their due. calling our manager a "MORON" cos he started DD, is what rattled me. if you cant understand that simple thing, then i cant help an idiot like you. only you have embarassed yourself dude. firstly you had no clue what i was doing. secondly you had no clye why i was doing it. and thirdly, you still had to butt in and try to be a stud. so really, stop embarassing yourself as for "monkey" i hope thats dealt with appropraitely!!!
-
of course they can. if costa had started it would have been a different story and i agreed on that. but i dont think any thing would have changed with remy in that game.
-
i have had enough of people taking digs at DD like he is simply to mooch off us. he is treated like a 70 year old on a wheel chair by people on here.
-
the defence of schalke and utd, were vulnerable, and us having drogba left them off the hook. what am i supposed to understand from this? then you go on to say that if remy and costa had played we would have won, like its that simple. i dont think we would have won the united game if remy had started. our midfield was poor in that game. unless it was costa who could have absolutely bullied rojo and smalling, and created something out of nothing, it was not affecting the result.
-
of course they are allowed to. and they did. now it seems that our manager was right to play DD. so i too have a right to criticise their opinions!!! dont i?
-
then why did you quote me you ass. if you dint have a problem with it then leave it alone, could not you? did i quote you initially? i am having a crack at people who think they know better than our manager, not me!!! get the difference? i am having a crack at people who had the balls of calling our manager a MORON for starting DD. so just dont put your nose where this does not belong!!
-
united was DD's fault? the performances of cesc and oscar were horrible. cesc was totally nullified by fellain and we simply were not able to play. thats like saying sunderland was costa's fault.
-
will be very interesting to see what jose has planned for us in case of matic's absence. a pivot of cesc and rambo looks disastorous to be honest. expecting a 3 man mid or a change in our shape.
-
i am sorry, but people treating our LEGEND as a liabilty and saying things like playing him is letting teams off the hook is what i call annoying and infact an absolute insult to the man who is playing and to the man who is choosing him to play!!!
-
and you said that i am doing this in hindsight which is not true. i am doing this to show people that just cos someone is 36 years old, it does not mean that he is a liability on the team. and i dint quote you, u quoted me, i replied back. eat your words. bloody keyboard managers who think they know better than the one who has won leagues and champions league. you know what, lets leave it at "eat your words".
-
its one thing to not like the selection. but saying "playing DD is letting teams off the hook" is just WRONG!!! what is DD? an amatuer player who is here to make up numbers or mooch off club?