didierforever

no one has the money to buy messi, unless RM come with a 200mil offer for hazard. koke = 45mil varane = 25mil bale = 75mil close to 150mil of spendings. never going to happen. moreover, buying koke/pogba and varane and selling deadwoods like oscar will be more than enough to take us a step further.

we cant say anything to RM about it. we bought luis for 16mil and he is rotting on the bench

need to make a decision on marin, moses, mvg, romeu, salah. taking up a massive space on our ffp table while giving us nothing.

and rightly so. perez should get the credit/critique about the RM transfers. honestly, selling ADM and alonso for james is an asenine transfer. meanwhile, our board should get the credit for the amount that we spend or receive in the transfer, but our targets would without a doubt be defined by jose.

i am happy for you if u can make sense of it cos honestly i cant. we bought willian after having mata, schurrle as winger options cos jose was not happy with what we had. and then we sold mata. similarly, we bought salah cos we sold mata and kdb. we bought cuadrado, cos we sold schurrle. "spending" is not an independent event. atleast not in this case scenario. also, how many matches did schurlle play as a LW and how many as a RW, cos as far as i remember, most of his starts have been as a sub. schurrle was not a RW for us. its like saying willian is a CAM for us just cos thats his main position.

THIS. even if luis is a little "circumspect" defensively, he can still do a very good job there (just watch ATM last season if you dont believe me). jose is trying to even out things by having hazard on the left and not having him track back and have some defensive cover on the left with azpi. meanwhile having iva and willian on the right trying to cover each other. but this approach is not working as well. its time he gave azpi-luis a chance as the full back pairing.

see this is something which i dont get. you cant use 70mil along with citing kdb,salah etc too. if u want to cite kdb, salah etc then the better way of putting it is jose spent (32+27+11=70 mil minus mata=37, kdb=17, so net of 16mil, infact make it 12mil since schurrle was bought for 18 and sold for 22) and still has not solved the problem. so jose has a net spend of 12 mil for one position for whom he simply has not been able to find a match winner

rambo for me is a sure shot player next season. we can agree to disagree but selling someone like rambo to be replaced by a teen would be a massive massive mistake. call it 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1. its almost the same thing. lets take it with 4-2-3-1. cesc plays as no.10 flanked by hazard and willian/cuadrado with both willian/hazard filling in when cesc is unavailable and with rambo as a filler winger. for the 2 pivot players, we will have matic and pogba/koke as starters with rambo as the back up along with whoever replaces mikel.

kane is english. hazard is not.

time to discuss his replacement. he will be sold for around 5mil pounds so dont think his replacement should cost more than 10mil (i am discussing this considering we sell oscar, shift cesc to the no.10 position and buy pogba/koke for the pivot. so essentially the player to replace mikel will again be the no.4 CM/DM after matic, pogba/koke and rambo). we have romeu and mvg in our loanees. chalobah is a distant possibility. RLC and ake is even further off in possibilities including probably baker. imbula and kondogbia would be good buys. imbula has impressed me whenever i have seen him play

damn fucking international week. why? why do we need an international week. hopelessly boring.

???

sterling and bale!!!??? seriously?? i mean atleast compare players in the same level.

don't think jose would care about that. I think they have jose's wife or daughter's nude pics.

captain. LEADER. LEGEND

pogba? reus? was there a hidden pirate treasure which city found under etihad?

if not pogba then KOKE.

ATM would be idiots to sell them for anything less than 25mil. better go for varane if we want to spend money of that kind.

anelka malouda oscar kalou mikel ramires ? bruma alex ? turnbull bring on barca, real, bayern!!!

i am sorry mate, i just dont see the potential there. even if oscar was as consistent as lampard was throughout his career, i still cant see how he can be CLOSE to world class.

Who? The average mistake prone multi hyped up "defender"

like i said before, another torres and mikelish player. the sooner he leaves, the better. cash out on him when people can still say things like "he has skills and is talented" or that "he plays as a no.10 from brazil" cos in another season or 2, people will have to eat their words again, just like people who said 3 seasons ago that oscar was a potential WORLD CLASS player ( :lol: )

i know its not a nazi camp, hence when some people decide to bitch and moan continously, i prefer to see at the positives and by god, there are a bucket load of positives. - glory hunter. so i am a glory hunter who was supporting the team even when we got knocked out by PSG but people like you and others who were cribbing, moaning and simply acting like childish brats are perfectly fine gentlemen simply looking at the quality. atleast have the courtesy to call it as it is, "luck".. really , there was nothing lucky yesterday. if we scored a scrappy goal and that tags us as "LUCKY", then what was the moment when courtois gifted them the goal. our first 20 minutes were very good attacking display. then we conceded 2 quick and horrible goals and from a comfortable situation, we found ourselves at the end of a barrel. the players were disorganized and needed a HT. after HT, we were again great. we deserved the win. also, do tell me about this luck that you keep talking about. were we lucky against burnley when we did not get 2 stonewall pens and then had a player sent off. were we lucky against soton when they got a pen for a similar thing that matic did but costa dint get a pen when fonte tackled him. i can go on and on and on. so dont try and put our team's realuts and performances down to luck. come up with a better argument. well, i would take a couple of poor result like PSG rather than a whole lot of "good performances" but 9 trophyless years like arsenal's which is what you seem to be indicating to. no thank you, really dont wanna join that group of fans. i am fine the way i am.

if u read my previous posts, it pretty clear of what different things he is giving us.

what? @The Mak see, i knew someone would say this.