Shane 2,275 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Be that as it may. Hiddink was in an advisory role when we were looking for his replacement in 2009. And he publicly backed Ancelotti in the papers when he was appointed. So 'if' he recommended Carlo's sacking, he essentially made a mistake recommending him in the first place.This is all if's and but's really though, Hiddink is a club advisor yes, But that doesn't mean he advises the club on everything. I'd imagine Roman hired Carlo solely on the fact that he has the know how of winning the Champions League, and I can't imagine Hiddink woud advise Roman to sack Ancelloti either. I know Guus publicly backed Carlo when he was appointed but maybe he felt he had too after Chelsea fans wanting to see Guus stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 This is all if's and but's really thoughThis is all if's and but's really though, Hiddink is a club advisor yes, But that doesn't mean he advises the club on everything. I'd imagine Roman hired Carlo solely on the fact that he has the know how of winning the Champions League, and I can't imagine Hiddink woud advise Roman to sack Ancelloti either. I know Guus publicly backed Carlo when he was appointed but maybe he felt he had too after Chelsea fans wanting to see Guus stay.You say it's all if's & but's, but you yourself have just indulged in an 'if & but', lmao. So you've contradicted your own argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 2,275 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 You say it's all if's & but's, but you yourself have just indulged in an 'if & but', lmao. So you've contradicted your own argument.I wasn't arguing, I was giving my opinion on the matter. It is all If's and but's at the moment, Because no one know's what Hiddink's potential role in Carlo's hiring/sacking was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace. 4,352 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Be that as it may. Hiddink was in an advisory role when we were looking for his replacement in 2009. And he publicly backed Ancelotti in the papers when he was appointed. So 'if' he recommended Carlo's sacking, he essentially made a mistake recommending him in the first place.Not necessarily. If back then Roman was looking for a manager who could win the Champions League the sooner possible with the current squad, then Hiddink has made the right choice, a priori. And if in may Roman was looking for a manager with certain abilities which Ancelotti didn't have, then Hiddink was right to advise him to sack Carlo. Nah mean lol ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Not necessarily. If back then Roman was looking for a manager who could win the Champions League the sooner possible with the current squad, then Hiddink has made the right choice, a priori. And if in may Roman was looking for a manager with certain abilities which Ancelotti didn't have, then Hiddink was right to advise him to sack Carlo. Nah mean lol ?Yea, fair enough, I see your point.It will forever be just speculation though. Nobody knows the inner workings of the chelsea hierarchy, especially not the papers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace. 4,352 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Yea, fair enough, I see your point.It will forever be just speculation though. Nobody knows the inner workings of the chelsea hierarchy, especially not the papers.Yup. And most important point, we don't know what Roman has in mind. So yeah, pure speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Be that as it may. Hiddink was in an advisory role when we were looking for his replacement in 2009. And he publicly backed Ancelotti in the papers when he was appointed. So 'if' he recommended Carlo's sacking, he essentially made a mistake recommending him in the first place.an excellent point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave30 728 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Well if Chels sign up Sparky, that might put manure in a dilemma, cause who will replace sir red nose David Moyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milllz 43 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 apparently lukaku and hiddink coming on mondayive read similar stuff, and apparently kevin de bruyne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo 1,729 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Nah mean lol ?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCV0KJ-_At0Back on topic, i'd be very surprised if Guus isn't appointed new manager by next weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,578 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/8066/4/exclusive-lampard-snr-backs-guus-hiddink-get-chelsea-job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Chris Hughton: I'm availablehttp://www.espn.co.u...tml?CMP=OTC-RSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
termninja 5,290 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Chris Hughton: I'm availablehttp://www.espn.co.u...tml?CMP=OTC-RSSPosted already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 "Guus goes on holiday tomorrow and I can say absolutely that he will still be in charge of Turkey in September for the next matches, against Kazakhstan and Austria. This is what we say, this is the position."Hiddink's agent says he will not be available till September Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanSnake 1,211 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Rule him out.We need a manager as soon as possible!Not someone we would have to risk weakening our team to wait for! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Hiddink's agent says he will not be available till Septemberin fact he most important thing about the article is the "source" who said he will be in charge in July. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke. 7 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Hiddink's agent says he will not be available till SeptemberI remember his agent said he definitely wouldn't join Chelsea back in 2009 when he was in charge of Russia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22mek22 133 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1394369/Chelsea-want-Guus-Hiddink-Mark-Hughes-deliver-Champions-League-glory.html?ITO=1490 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milllz 43 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 really dont think hughes is up to it to be honest :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismada9 1,948 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 One question that springs to mind as far as I'm concerned amid these rumors...Hiddink: ManagerHughes: Assistant Managercould it work?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts