Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

Actually, it's a good thing they won. Now they hopefully won't panic-buy anyone else. All in all, they looked far from unbeatable so far. And the goal aside, Ramsey didn't play all that well, tbh. Sanchez is clearly struggling to adapt.

They looked quite poor imo, if they don't buy a DM and a CB I won't consider them challengers for the title.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    10336

  • Laylabelle

    4831

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2611

Ramsay is a good player.

Why does watching him make me angry at Oscar?

When you look at Ramsey, you see a player that gives confidence.

When you look at Oscar, I don't feel it.

He is too much of nice guy and needs to be a bit more of a cunt.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arsenal weren't lucky. Scoring in the 92nd minute is no luckier than scoring in the 17th. The outplayed Palace. 76% possession. 14 shots to 4. Chamakh should have conceded a penalty that wasn't called, etc...They weren't lucky to win, they deserved it. I always find it funny how much people overreact to one game, especially early in the season. United won 4-1 away to open last season. Arsenal lost 3-1 at home to Villa. The year before that, the eventual champions United lost their opening game. You can't drawn any conclusions about anything from one game whether it be how a team plays or how a player plays. I know it's pointless to say this because no matter, after Monday's game it will be Costa can't score (if he doesn't) or Costa was a steal (if he does). And it won't be Costa. It will be everyone and everything. If we play well, we are going to win the Premier League. If we don't, we screwed up and have no shot. I just wish more people on here had a little more long-term perspective and fewer knee-jerk reactions.

i disagree about the luck part, when someone scores in injury time to win a game they've always been lucky

no matter how great they've played

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i disagree about the luck part, when someone scores in injury time to win a game they've always been lucky

no matter how great they've played

That's just not true. Something like 5-10% of all goals are scored in stoppage time. You can't ascribe to luck to what is actually extremely commonplace. In fact, the end of games is actually statistically the most likely time to score. According to this logic, you can outshoot a team 150-0 with 99.9% of possession but if you don't score until added time, you are lucky to win.

If a team outplays another team and they win, it isn't luck. Even if you believe that scoring in injury time was lucky (which it isn't), it then means that not scoring during regular time was even more unlucky. Arsenal were the better team and they won. Where is the luck? Lucky is when a team is outplayed and scores a fluke goal or gets a bunch of big breaks (from referee, injuries, and so on.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between Arsenal and Ramsey and Chelsea and Oscar is that Ramsey gets support when he plays badly (which he did a few seasons ago) unlike here when people can't wait to get on Oscar's back after a run of average or poor games.

Hahahaha I still can't stop laughing at United :D

They have even worse squad then last season and yet some United fans even thought about going for the title this season :D They celebrate LvG like he's the Chuck Norris of football xD

And I absolutely hate formation 3-5-2 and absolutely I'm in love to see United implement it. Can't wait to play them and exploit those wings! Young as a left wing back? :getin: xD

Their squad is just awful, simple as that. The worst United squad I can remember. Evans? Smalling? Hernandez? Carrick? Welbeck? Powel? Fletcher? Cleverley? Anderson? I wouldn't take a single one of them. They need 2 great centre backs, 2 great midfielders and a quality right wing back (unless Valencia can have a good season and stay fit). With players who are available and the inflated transfer market, I doubt they have enough money to plug all the holes they need. I'm sick and tired of Manchesters winning title and it's lovely to see one of them collapsing.

And that cunt Fellaini? Should've got his sorry ass sent of for all the elbows, tackles and knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arsenal weren't lucky. Scoring in the 92nd minute is no luckier than scoring in the 17th. The outplayed Palace. 76% possession. 14 shots to 4. Chamakh should have conceded a penalty that wasn't called, etc...They weren't lucky to win, they deserved it. I always find it funny how much people overreact to one game, especially early in the season. United won 4-1 away to open last season. Arsenal lost 3-1 at home to Villa. The year before that, the eventual champions United lost their opening game. You can't drawn any conclusions about anything from one game whether it be how a team plays or how a player plays. I know it's pointless to say this because no matter, after Monday's game it will be Costa can't score (if he doesn't) or Costa was a steal (if he does). And it won't be Costa. It will be everyone and everything. If we play well, we are going to win the Premier League. If we don't, we screwed up and have no shot. I just wish more people on here had a little more long-term perspective and fewer knee-jerk reactions.

What do we call it if a team outplay another team and bring a draw or lose in the end of the game?

Unlucky isnt it?

So idk if your pov or mine is wrong, but u cant say ppl pov is funny unless its fact, not pov.

Another point of view, arsenal win on posession, chance etc while Swansea did a fantastic job at defending. We can call swansea unlucky for losing it at injury time while arsenal is. Arsenal have WC players and more expensive while every important players at Swanse are often getting sold at the end of the season. Or do you think an attacking minded team always deserve to win?

NB: please remain focus while i mention POV, keep the definition in a proper way, not another :wank2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do we call it if a team outplay another team and bring a draw or lose in the end of the game?

Unlucky isnt it?

So idk if your pov or mine is wrong, but u cant say ppl pov is funny unless its fact, not pov.

Another point of view, arsenal win on posession, chance etc while Swansea did a fantastic job at defending. We can call swansea unlucky for losing it at injury time while arsenal is. Arsenal have WC players and more expensive while every important players at Swanse are often getting sold at the end of the season. Or do you think an attacking minded team always deserve to win?

NB: please remain focus while i mention POV, keep the definition in a proper way, not another :wank2:

as most things in life, those are the two sides of the coin. You're as right as he is, although I agree with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between Arsenal and Ramsey and Chelsea and Oscar is that Ramsey gets support when he plays badly (which he did a few seasons ago) unlike here when people can't wait to get on Oscar's back after a run of average or poor games.

And I absolutely hate formation 3-5-2 and absolutely I'm in love to see United implement it. Can't wait to play them and exploit those wings! Young as a left wing back? :getin: xD

Their squad is just awful, simple as that. The worst United squad I can remember. Evans? Smalling? Hernandez? Carrick? Welbeck? Powel? Fletcher? Cleverley? Anderson? I wouldn't take a single one of them. They need 2 great centre backs, 2 great midfielders and a quality right wing back (unless Valencia can have a good season and stay fit). With players who are available and the inflated transfer market, I doubt they have enough money to plug all the holes they need. I'm sick and tired of Manchesters winning title and it's lovely to see one of them collapsing.

I remember ALOT of supporters criticising Ramsey in his early days at Arsenal but credit to the player, he put in extra time in the training ground, worked with former class midfielders and turned himself into a top-class CM.

If Oscar can add to his game and become even 70% as influential as Ramsey, every Chelsea supporter would be delighted and we would be much better off as a team.

As for United, out of the list you provided, I'd take Welbeck because he's homegrown and he would probably be useful as a striker/winger off the bench..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You