Rumoured Alexis Sanchez

[Dimitr 488]

Wake up 

Agent Mino Raiola “Manchester United is not going to sign Sánchez unless Mkhi agrees to join Arsenal. Sánchez is part of the Mkhi deal, not the other way around."

[Ledg 640]

 

[Unionjack 7,531]

16 minutes ago, Ledgi said:

 

I'd take them both TBH

[manpe 10,861]

Calm down guys, those Sanchez rumours are planted so we can go low profile for Andy Carroll without competition from Barcelona or PSG. 

[Strike 7,249]

Alexis Sanchez, trying to sign him?
I don’t know, I don’t think so. 

- Conte at presser today

[Laylabelle 9,376]

Ah... 

[Special Juan 27,439]

"I don't know I don't think so"

Make ya fucking mind up

[Strike 7,249]

5 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

"I don't know I don't think so"

Make ya fucking mind up

I think he is being honest. Says a lot about who takes transfer decisions, if we didn't know it already

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

32 minutes ago, Strike said:

I think he is being honest. Says a lot about who takes transfer decisions, if we didn't know it already

 

37 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

"I don't know I don't think so"

Make ya fucking mind up

Agree. I honestly think he has no idea lol.    He got asked week or 2 back about why we hadnt bid and said "i dont know"

He gives his opinion and the board then decide who to buy - his words.   For him to have no idea who is joining is no surprise, i wouldnt take his response as final. This is a board deal (if true)

[Dimitr 488]

Hmm 

ok forget him 

ok he is one of the best but it’s very difficult to have courtois,hazard ,Sanchez  with salary 400k£ almost impossible. Even man city can’t do this.

 

lets go for mahrez or malcom or someone else . And not carol 

[Dimitr 488]

Change of the rhetoric of Conte re signings is alarming. He said months ago that he and the club discussed signings, that he had a say. Now he doesn't even know who the club are looking for? Can't see Conte around beyond summer.

[manpe 10,861]

8 minutes ago, Dimitr said:

lets go for mahrez or malcom or someone else

I can imagine such conversation taking place.

Conte: Let's go for Mahrez, Malcom or Lem...
*Roman and Marina looking at each other*
Roman: Did I just hear him say Nathan Redmond?
Marina: Yup
*Conte crying*

[Fulham Broadway 16,915]

1 minute ago, manpe said:

I can imagine such conversation taking place.

Conte: Let's go for Mahrez, Malcom or Lem...
*Roman and Marina looking at each other*
Roman: Did I just hear him say Nathan Redmond?
Marina: Yup
*Conte crying*

Funny but probably not far off. Its like the board are ambitious every other season.

For Fucks Fucking Sake-  sell off 3 or 4 loan players and get the Chilean money grabber. 

There are repercussions as well  -who would Hazard rather be playing with, who is more likely to make him want to stay - Sandro and Sanchez or Bakayoko and Carroll.

 

[gdlk 272]

Dark clouds are over the Chelsea club for a 3 years and I cant see a bright future too.. 

[The Skipper 20,593]

8 hours ago, Dingus said:

In fact, getting an Alexis Sanchez-esque type of player might actually encourage the likes of Hazard and Courtois to actually sign their extensions.

Yep. This is spot on. People just look at the money and don’t want to realise that there are way more pros than cons. 

[oldportblue 547]

2 hours ago, gdlk said:

Dark clouds are over the Chelsea club for a 3 years and I cant see a bright future too.. 

maybe in terms of relations between managers and the board, sure. but in terms of success on the pitch, if winning two PL titles and one league cup in 3 years is "having dark clouds overs us", then may those dark clouds remain forever lol

[Fulham Broadway 16,915]

But because CFC is a business first and foremost £350 000 a week for someone who might be around for a couple of years isn't viable. It isn't economically viable because Courtois on 100k a week wages would have to be doubled. Hazard would have to be on a par with Sanchez to keep Madrid away. Then every other player would also demand incremental proportionate wage rises. Unless Abramovich is persuaded by the Yes men and Maria to open his wallet more, very unlikely, and that it is investing then Utd, City and even Liverpool will permanently overtake us.

[Unionjack 7,531]

6 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

it is investing

Thats hat it would be.

The argument that his wages would mean that Eden,Tibo etc would want a payrise is daft. Hes apparently already been offered £300k anyway. And why should he be worth as nuch as Sanchez? We dont get Dave,Kante going whining saying they want as much as Eden do they? Theyre arguably just as importabt as him. In  any company theres some employees earning more than the others. Because they do different jobs. I personally would pay Sanchez more than Eden.

And how much would we make ftom ads,shirts,sposors and general hype around the footballing world? Plus really fuck off gooners and Mou. I'd buy him just for that.

And just for general good feeling amongst players and supporters. They must know shirley we are pissed off or they are so far removed from the supporters or stuck up Romans arse to give a fuck.

So I do think its good business sense. We just have no footballing sense! We need footballers on the board.

Whats the business sense of us not making the top 4 or compting with anyone whatsoever worth talking about?

Plain fuckin daft!