Edinson Cavani

[kellzfresh 7,229]

I would have really liked Benteke here but sadly he's injured. I've been really impressed with him he's like a perfect Jose type striker with good qualities and he's fairly young (23).

Yea.... He has technical ability on the ball, is strong, good finisher, good linkup play and his back to goal is excellent. I would love him as a second striker.

[Korea 734]

Cavani is better than Costa.

Cavani would not be behind costa.

Cavani managed 25 goals on a zlatan team.... That in itself is impressive.

Cavani is the perfect cf for chelsea....... JUst like drogba was prior.

[sherry33 234]

Cavani is better than Costa.

Cavani would not be behind costa.

Cavani managed 25 goals on a zlatan team.... That in itself is impressive.

Cavani is the perfect cf for chelsea....... JUst like drogba was prior.

Finally someone who is speaking sense Cavani>Costa no matter how you view it.

[iseah100 5,612]

Finally someone who is speaking sense Cavani>Costa no matter how you view it.

Costa is better for Chelsea. Cavani is slightly above average.

[Pizy 18,853]

Costa is better for Chelsea. I've barely watched Cavani play.

Fixed.

[iseah100 5,612]

Fixed.

I haven't. But what I have seen was less than impressive.

[Pizy 18,853]

I haven't. But what I have seen was less than impressive.

All you have to do is watch footage of his Napoli days to see that he's a beast. He would be again in the right circumstances.

Even during the World Cup and for PSG when he isn't a prolific scorer he still works his ass off and is probably the only striker I've seen in recent times who covers so much of the pitch. He works like mad and is constantly running. Even saw him tracking all the way back in the LB position for Uruguay. He's got a similar work rate to Suarez.

Don't know if it'd be totally wise to splurge a load of money on him anymore since we have Costa but I wouldn't be disappointed if we did and I'd be delighted to have him. Perfect José player.

[stroey 2,525]

Finally someone who is speaking sense Cavani>Costa no matter how you view it.

Costa is stronger, faster, better finisher, better dribbling skills, also younger, can play as winger and as second striker, great in linking up and assisting too. His brutal character and fighting spirit is also really important for this Chelsea.

Costa>Cavani

[The Skipper 20,609]

Cavani hasn't been performing at Napoli level for a while now... Can't see how anyone can say with confidence that Cavani > Costa now. Costa as of right now is the better striker IMO - maybe that'll change if Cavani went to a club where he'd be number 1 striker again but as of right now for me, Costa's better.

[iseah100 5,612]

All you have to do is watch footage of his Napoli days to see that he's a beast. He would be again in the right circumstances.

Even during the World Cup and for PSG when he isn't a prolific scorer he still works his ass off and is probably the only striker I've seen in recent times who covers so much of the pitch. He works like mad and is constantly running. Even saw him tracking all the way back in the LB position for Uruguay. He's got a similar work rate to Suarez.

Don't know if it'd be totally wise to splurge a load of money on him anymore since we have Costa but I wouldn't be disappointed if we did and I'd be delighted to have him. Perfect José player.

That was quite a while ago. And that was in Italy, which is not a top 3 league. He may work his ass off but so does Ramires and he gets criticized every day. I wouldn't mind him here, but we don't need him.

[Pizy 18,853]

I'd say they're about even. If you asked me which would score more this coming season if played as our lone #9 I'd probably say Cavani.

[sherry33 234]

All you have to do is watch footage of his Napoli days to see that he's a beast. He would be again in the right circumstances.

Even during the World Cup and for PSG when he isn't a prolific scorer he still works his ass off and is probably the only striker I've seen in recent times who covers so much of the pitch. He works like mad and is constantly running. Even saw him tracking all the way back in the LB position for Uruguay. He's got a similar work rate to Suarez.

Don't know if it'd be totally wise to splurge a load of money on him anymore since we have Costa but I wouldn't be disappointed if we did and I'd be delighted to have him. Perfect José player.

Loads of bollocks just because he is our player doesn't mean he is the best.

Cavani didn't had a great year but he was second fiddle to Ibra, i reckon Costa would have the same problem if he was in his place.

Talking about World Cup really dude? What did Costa actually do in it?

As far as im concerned you clearly have not watched Cavani, anyone putting Costa above him is mostly because he plays for us and the fact Costa played great last season in his most prolific spot. Somthing Cavani didn't.

I like how most defended Costa when some said he was just a one season wonder, and we re using the argument he was second fiddle to Falcao yet say Cavani is "average".

[Pizy 18,853]

Loads of bollocks just because he is our player doesn't mean he is the best.

Cavani didn't had a great year but he was second fiddle to Ibra, i reckon Costa would have the same problem if he was in his place.

Talking about World Cup really dude? What did Costa actually do in it?

As far as im concerned you clearly have not watched Cavani, anyone putting Costa above him is mostly because he plays for us and the fact Costa played great last season in his most prolific spot. Somthing Cavani didn't.

I like how most defended Costa when some said he was just a one season wonder, and we re using the argument he was second fiddle to Falcao yet say Cavani is "average".

Did you even read my post, genius?

[iseah100 5,612]

Loads of bollocks just because he is our player doesn't mean he is the best.

Cavani didn't had a great year but he was second fiddle to Ibra, i reckon Costa would have the same problem if he was in his place.

Talking about World Cup really dude? What did Costa actually do in it?

As far as im concerned you clearly have not watched Cavani, anyone putting Costa above him is mostly because he plays for us and the fact Costa played great last season in his most prolific spot. Somthing Cavani didn't.

I like how most defended Costa when some said he was just a one season wonder, and we re using the argument he was second fiddle to Falcao yet say Cavani is "average".

Umm, you quoted the wrong post. I think.

Costa did better last year than Cavani ever has. He is more clinical and stronger, younger.

[sherry33 234]

Umm, you quoted the wrong post. I think.

Costa did better last year than Cavani ever has. He is more clinical and stronger, younger.

I agree but as i said mostly why Costa had a better year was because he was playing in his most prolific spot.

And this actually made me angry because its definitely not entire true

Costa is stronger, faster, better finisher, better dribbling skills, also younger, can play as winger and as second striker, great in linking up and assisting too. His brutal character and fighting spirit is also really important for this Chelsea.

Costa>Cavani

Did you even read my post, genius?

I wanted to quote all 3 above but forgot to add last 2