Term-X 7,891 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 what about man-utd..none of these little clubs wanna report them fifa, notice that story about them soon died down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Godd...these little clubs are comming out like PESTS from their fucking holes.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesarblues 51 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 lil club wanna get spotlight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 That's all they are LITTLE clubs. Ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Either way, we still have the squad to win trophies both this season and next. I am very confident the ban will be reduced, as it was from Roma - if it isn't, it's totally unfair and will confirm the anti-Chelsea agenda shared by UEFA and FIFA, in which case, Chelsea should boycott European competition IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 As far as I'm concerned, whilst Arnesen picks up his £50,000 a week wage-packet, its the academy coaches who develop these players, not him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott 7 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Frankly I think FIFA have got it wrong. Kakuta did not have a legally binding contract with Lens, simple as that. FIFA are trying to say that it is legal in the world of football because they want to protect youngsters and the clubs that develop them, but that doesn't change the fact that actually, Kakuta's contract at the time was a pre-contract agreement and nothing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drogba11CFC 108 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 French clubs too...Whatever happened to cheese-eating surrender monkeys? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alee. 182 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Whatever happened to cheese-eating surrender monkeys?Looking for lawyers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Cee 50 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 lil club wanna get spotlightChange that to money... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Arnesen’s role in the signing of Gael Kakuta, the 18-year-old French winger at the centre of the controversy, will come under fierce scrutiny as will that of Chelsea chief executive Peter Kenyon. However it is understood that Arnesen, in particular, pushed for the signing of Kakuta which has led to Chelsea being accused, and found guilty by football’s world governing body, of inducing the midfielder to break his contract with his previous club, Lens, in 2007. Chelsea argue that there was no contract in place and that Arnesen and Kenyon acted properly, but Fifa sources are adamant that they will be able to produce the necessary evidence while Lens have also accused the Premier League club of paying “a lot of money” to Kakuta’s family to encourage him to move to Stamford Bridge. Arnesen’s position at Chelsea has been under threat before, not least last year when he appeared to be on the verge of leaving, while previous to that he had clashed with Jose Mourinho. Club owner Roman Abramovich, along with his key director Eugene Tenenbaum will demand answers as to how the debacle has happened. Arnesen has proved a great survivor, and was promoted at Chelsea during the summer, becoming more central to the first-team plans, but will need to satisfy Abramovich over this deal. Chelsea maintained yesterday that they will definitely appeal Fifa’s ruling and will, once they have received the evidence and documentation in the next three weeks, go to the Court of Arbitration in Sport to try and reduce or overturn the ban which includes fines of nearly 1m euros for the club and player and a four-month ban for Kakuta. Chelsea captain John Terry yesterday spoke of his “shock” at the ruling. “What is my reaction to the Fifa ban? It was a big shock to me and it is very difficult,” he said. “But it is difficult for me to talk about it. I have spoken to the club last night and again this morning and they have reiterated that I can’t speak about it as they are appealing very strongly.” CAS’s secretary general, Matthieu Reeb, said yesterday that Chelsea can expect a decision on that appeal by mid-December. “It will be a final decision which would replace the Fifa decision if necessary,” he said. Chelsea will hope to have the sentence reduced, of course, although because CAS appear able to hear the case before January it doesn’t seem likely that the club could – as previously happened with FC Sion, who faced a similar charge – apply for a stay on the penalty allowing them to trade in the winter transfer window. Chelsea believe that they are the victims of a witch-hunt given their, previous, fractious relationship with Uefa while the ramifications of the verdict may well be felt throughout Europe’s leading clubs. Le Havre cried foul last month over Manchester United’s signing of Paul Pogba although they have yet to make a formal complaint. United deny any wrongdoing. Yesterday Jean-Pierre Louvel, the club’s president, said of the Kakuta verdict: “It's a strong signal to the England clubs, notably Chelsea, who have yet to understand that there are rules that have to be respected by clubs and by young players. “That should make other English clubs think twice before going ahead with this kind of thing. They have to take into consideration the French clubs that have developed these players and invested in them. I hope that Manchester will find themselves with the same problems that Chelsea are now facing. We are in a very similar situation (to Lens).” Leading Italian clubs - Lazio, Roma and Fiorentina - have all voiced their displeasure at losing the crown jewels of their youth schemes to United over the past two years, with Sir Alex Ferguson taking Federico Macheda, Davide Petrucci and, most recently, Michele Fornasier. Reggina are also believed to have lodged a complaint with the FIGC, the Italian FA, and Uefa over Chelsea’s pursuit of Vincenzo Camilleri, a defender just 15 when he spurned the chance to sign professional terms with the southern Italian club. Similarly, Macheda moved to Manchester a day after his 16th birthday and Fornasier had already featured for United in a tournament in Northern Ireland at the age of 15. Under UEFA’s current regulations, all international transfers are banned of players under the age of 16 unless their parents are moving abroad for reasons other than football. www.telegraph.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanSnake 1,211 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 So wait, it was BOTH Arnesen and Kenyon?Still sack Arnesen, don't know about Kenyon though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismada9 1,948 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 He's T*ttenham material, he should have stayed where he was.....oh wait, didn't we actually try to tap him up from T*ttenham... well that just sums it all thensack the bastard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kez 2,727 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 FFS what next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanSnake 1,211 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Fucking Arnesen and he's stupidity. Dammit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaChick 430 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 ffs just what we need Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 From the Daily Star so really doubt theres much truth into it and if does become true just shows the system is well crap!!But dont see how they would be able to/get permisson to do thisFifa has warned Chelsea they could have their worldwide transfer banfor poaching Lens teenager Gael Kakuta increased if they lose an appealagainst the original punishment, which prevents them buying playersuntil January 2011. From BBC gossip do dah..so enough said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kez 2,727 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 :thumbsdown: don't know how true that is but if it is thats absolute bollocks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drogba11CFC 108 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Obviously free speech doesn't exist in football... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Para6iT 2 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Bla bla bla.. CRAP!!! nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.