Jump to content

🇧🇪 45. Romeo Lavia


James
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Wish there was someone that did an investigation for all these injuries. 

PL Games started this season. 

 

Reece James - 5

Lesly Ugochukwu - 3

Christopher Nkunku - 2

Carney Chukwuemeka - 2

Romeo Lavia - 0

Wesley Fofana - 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was never going to play that regularly ahead of Enzo, Moises & Connor anyway.

Said it at the time, he had played one season at Southampton (had a good game against us) and he was some sort of must sign player. 

Not sure what the medical team are at either as it is a reoccurring theme but we pretty much signed him injured in the summer and it’s been injury after injury ever since.

Said it at the time the likes of him & Ugo, particularly when you consider the apparent hype and whatever around Andrey Santos, were stupid signings when we really needed some proven quality in to help what we already had. We could have signed Joao Palhinha from Fulham for £55-65m and had some change left over instead of what we paid for the two of them.

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

He was never going to play that regularly ahead of Enzo, Moises & Connor anyway.

Said it at the time, he had played one season at Southampton (had a good game against us) and he was some sort of must sign player. 

Maybe under Poch but if/when we finally have a modern/possesion based manager it will be a Lavia/Enzo/Caicedo three with Conor (if he's still here) used appropriately as the horses for courses option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37a092e4b92d26b1e648e6e1b918947e.png

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/03/27/Chelsea-romeo-lavia-ruled-out-rest-of-season/

TELEMMGLPICT000371955542_17115545975260_

Romeo Lavia has been ruled out for the remainder of the season after suffering a setback in his recovery from injury – meaning he will have played just 32 minutes for Chelsea in the entire campaign.
 
Chelsea paid £53 million to sign 20-year-old Lavia from Southampton ahead of Liverpool last summer, but the midfielder has been struck down by injuries.
An ankle injury meant that it took Lavia four months to make his Chelsea debut as a 58th-minute substitute in the victory over Crystal Palace in December.
 
But Lavia suffered a significant thigh injury during that cameo and has not played since. On Wednesday, Chelsea confirmed that the Belgian has suffered a setback in his recovery and has now been ruled out for the remainder of the campaign.
 
Lavia is just one name on a long list of Chelsea players who have been out with injuries this season, which also includes Wesley Fofana, Reece James, Christopher Nkunku, Lesly Ugochukwu, Levi Colwill. Carney Chukwuemeka and Ben Chilwell have also been out, but have recently returned.
 
The Chelsea statement said: “Midfielder Romeo Lavia is to unfortunately miss the remainder of our 2023-24 campaign following a setback in his recovery.
“Recent medical assessments have confirmed that Lavia, who sustained a significant thigh injury against Crystal Palace back in December, will not feature again this season.”
 
Lavia’s absence will invite more scrutiny on Chelsea’s medical department, which has seen the resignation of long-serving medical director Dimitrios Kalogiannidis this year.
 
Chelsea have advertised the fact they are looking to appoint a new head of performance medicine on the Linkedin website.
 
The advertisement for the first-team role, for which the salary is listed as ‘competitive’ says: “This is a key role to the club and requires a collaborative, committed and professional medical practitioner, who can be a great teammate.
 
The role will include but not limited to providing injury or illness assessments, undertaking player signing medicals and assisting in decision making and rehabilitation management of medical issues when required.”
 
It adds: “We want to deliver football medicine and performance sciences differently. To create and be an integrated, open-minded and performance support focused team behind the team.
 
We seek to empower our staff, and our model is evolving as we seek to bring in new approaches and thoughts.
“We are looking for someone who can build rapport quickly with staff and players, and be a clear communicator to allow all involved to be fully informed of players’ health status and readiness to play.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tomo said:

Maybe under Poch but if/when we finally have a modern/possesion based manager it will be a Lavia/Enzo/Caicedo three with Conor (if he's still here) used appropriately as the horses for courses option.

Think in the big games it should be that midfield 3, but against the majority of clubs id want a CAM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

This is all on Clownlake - sacking all the medical staff and outsourcing because its 'cheaper' Wankers

Yes before sacking the coach or buying any players they should do a total review of the medical team. This is just un aceptable. 

Getting new players or managers won't do it as they will be hamper by the incompetent of the medical team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Fernando said:

Yes before sacking the coach or buying any players they should do a total review of the medical team. This is just un aceptable. 

Getting new players or managers won't do it as they will be hamper by the incompetent of the medical team. 

Its undermining and sabotaging Chelsea FC. They should be in court and jailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tomo said:

Maybe under Poch but if/when we finally have a modern/possesion based manager it will be a Lavia/Enzo/Caicedo three with Conor (if he's still here) used appropriately as the horses for courses option.

We will see but I still think people are expecting too much too soon from Lavia. I don’t think it was ever a reality that he would be starting ahead of any of those 3 and was likely going to be coming in to back up Moises perhaps.

And even then, if he did, same old question as it is now. Would that MF 3 still not be lacking severely in creativity or someone who gets in and around the box to good effect?

I mean even with Connor, it is lacking of sorts and he has probably been our best central midfielder for attacking output this season.

Instead of going hell for leather in 2 windows and getting Santos, Ugo and Lavia (all pretty much fall into that same category as more defensively minded midfielders) we probably could have signed a more creative midfielder and a more experienced campaigner for the same money if not less.

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, James said:

 

Had problems when he signed from Soton! why the fuck did they sign him then?

I bet the bin dippers are laughing their bollocks off they could of ended up with Caicedo and Labia.

Edited by bigbluewillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...