King Kante 1,643 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 1 hour ago, Reddish-Blue said: Would have been even better if Broja and Chalobah were sold permanently. Tbf, Broja's deal to Ipswich was a good one. Just a shame he is made of glass and got injured again. Reddish-Blue 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kante 1,643 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 (edited) 51 minutes ago, Vesper said: and Chilwell Tbf, after watching us against Palace playing a one man midfield when off the ball, I am not too sure how long Enzo can play this system unless Gusto, James and Veiga can start picking up the inverted position to the level of Cucu (who won't be able to play every game) as it leaves us completely open on the counter. In that case Chilwell may be handy to have knocking about still. Edited September 3, 2024 by King Kante OneMoSalah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DH1988 1,350 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 I can honestly see those mugs changing the rules on PSR after we've sold all of our homegrown talent. As Enzo said, it's a rule problem, not a Chelsea problem. If the rule was changed there is no shot we would consider selling Trev over Disasi for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,226 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 players we still need to perm sell Raheem Sterling trash Trevoh Chalobah Djordje Petrovic meh Armando Broja trash Alfie Gilchrist passion merchant, bye bye Kepa Arrizabalaga enough said Ben Chilwell Axel Disasi trash Robert Sánchez trash Deivid Washington ? David Datro Fofana meh Cesare Casadei meh so far Benoît Badiashile trash Harvey Vale meh £250m or so, hopefully (really rough guess) If I forgot some, please let me know yes, I know, Mudryk, but I see no signs we will sell him atm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,226 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 16 minutes ago, DH1988 said: I can honestly see those mugs changing the rules on PSR after we've sold all of our homegrown talent. As Enzo said, it's a rule problem, not a Chelsea problem. If the rule was changed there is no shot we would consider selling Trev over Disasi for example. that would result in a multi-billion pound lawsuit (and far from just Chels as the plaintiffs) IF the EPL/FA/UEFA want to force a Super League, then they can all keep playing games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,226 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 47 minutes ago, King Kante said: Tbf, Broja's deal to Ipswich was a good one. Just a shame he is made of glass and got injured again. It was not that good, as Ipswich had to stay up in order for the obligation to buy to kick in good luck with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,226 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 Ranking the Premier League clubs’ transfers windows: Unhinged, treacherous, hmmm https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5735669/2024/09/03/premier-league-clubs-transfer-window-ranking/ snip 8 — Chelsea Where to start…? Remember when Chelsea finally found consistency and won nine of their final 15 matches of last season and you sort of thought that with a few sensible summer additions they could really kick on under Mauricio Pochettino in 2024-25? Nope, scrap all that. New head coach with no top-level managerial experience but on a five-year contract, 14 new signings, 18 departures, more money spent than any club in the world, more money received than any Premier League club, throw absolutely everything at a wall and see what sticks. Everything might work. Everything might implode. Who knows? Describe it in one word: Unhinged bigbluewillie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,226 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 Chelsea ‘appear to be primarily a trading hub’ and have ‘ceased to be a football club’ https://Chelsea.news/2024/09/Chelsea-appear-to-be-primarily-a-trading-hub-and-have-ceased-to-be-a-football-club/ It’s that time of the year again where critics, media, fans, and everyone else in between reflect on the last long and busy summer transfer window that has just closed. Chelsea’s new owners have had their critics from day one really, many of them, but they seem to be getting more and more heat on them by the day for the way they have been operating in the transfer window. The latest summer window has been no different either, they have still been buying up many young talents from around the globe, and also selling and loaning out players as well. It’s a really busy club for player sales and arrivals, and has been since Todd Boehly and Clearlake became the owners. Some people claim to see the vision, others are just not buying it at all. Everyone has an opinion. Chelsea a trading hub now? It is the opinion of The Daily Mail’s Matt Barlow that Chelsea have just become a trading hub rather than a football club, in his latest deep dive article into the club’s transfer business and squad build. Barlow believes Chelsea have ignored buying the importance of experience and will end up paying for it. As seen above, Barlow wrote: ‘Five markets into the new era and Chelsea are behaving as if they have ceased to be a football club. They appear to be primarily a trading hub. A staggering blur of comings and goings.’ I do think some Chelsea fans will agree with him, whilst others will not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kante 1,643 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 10 minutes ago, Vesper said: It was not that good, as Ipswich had to stay up in order for the obligation to buy to kick in good luck with that Tbh, no club were going to be sane enough to agree to an outright obligation at £30m. If he went there he could've been crap and if they scrapped their way to a second season like Huddersfield did a few years back we would've got a fee regardless. His deal now means he has to perform and stay fit. Both of which he seems incapable of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vytis33 1,276 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,146 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 Osimhen has been completely and utterly fucked over. DH1988 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mhsc 1,098 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 1 hour ago, Vytis33 said: To be fair, that is very encouraging - there is the chance that Osimhen has been awfully misrepresented here. Guess we'll see what decisions he makes in January to find out. Should never have come to this, worst case scenario should have been a dry loan to Chelsea - if he wanted to be taken seriously as a top player. LAM09, Vytis33, bigbluewillie and 1 other 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,944 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 Can see him coming here in Jan you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 6 minutes ago, DDA said: Can see him coming here in Jan you know. Apparently Gala paying £160k of his salary yet we wouldn’t offer him over £150k on a permanent deal. Can’t see it. Unless we put another £40-50k on top of it. Minimum. Aye he’s parted way with his agent, wanted a permanent move, still doesn’t mean his wage demands may drop significantly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,819 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 5 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said: Apparently Gala paying £160k of his salary yet we wouldn’t offer him over £150k on a permanent deal. Can’t see it. Unless we put another £40-50k on top of it. Minimum. Aye he’s parted way with his agent, wanted a permanent move, still doesn’t mean his wage demands may drop significantly. His offer from Chelsea was 150k with incentives that could take it to 300k. He might not like that he has to earn the other half of the offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkh 601 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 (edited) Reece James is unlikely to be fit enough to start against Chelsea's next opponent, Bournemouth. He is still thought to be a couple of weeks away from returning to full training. (@Matt_Law_DT) 🤢😵💫😵💫 250,000 pounds per weeks Romeo Lavía due to start training again with a view to being fit for the Bournemouth game. (@Matt_Law_DT) 🙌🙌 Edited September 3, 2024 by mkh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mhsc 1,098 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 21 minutes ago, mkh said: Reece James is unlikely to be fit enough to start against Chelsea's next opponent, Bournemouth. He is still thought to be a couple of weeks away from returning to full training. (@Matt_Law_DT) 🤢😵💫😵💫 250,000 pounds per weeks Reece is probably next in the bomb squad unfortunately... Vesper and mkh 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,062 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 4 hours ago, Vytis33 said: Better late than never, I suppose. The harm has been done; whether that lasts for four months or till next May will show how bad the decision ultimately was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesper 30,226 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 1 hour ago, Mhsc said: Reece is probably next in the bomb squad unfortunately... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHulk 2,482 Posted September 3, 2024 Share Posted September 3, 2024 2 hours ago, Mhsc said: Reece is probably next in the bomb squad unfortunately... We should sell him while his stock is still high anyway, he contributes to absolutely nothing nowdays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.