Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Strike said:

and should include a buyback clause 

how many buy backs are actually used in the Premier league though? 

If Hutchinson wants to play for us and if he's in Maresca's plans, we shouldn't be selling him at all.   But if he's not keen on being a bit part/squad player next season, good luck to him and hopefully we get a decent sell-on clause. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dewsbury-Hall is a weird target but I guess I can kind of see the logic, if we can sell Gallagher for decent money (£45m+) and get Deswbury-Hall for £25m it is immensely helpful for the books. He would not be an exciting signing but he has just had a good season, knows the system and I can see an argument that he will look like an even better player with a better team around him.

Definitely feels like a move old Chelsea would make more than new Chelsea though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

Disgusting if we waste resources on this guy, I'd rather keep Gallagher.

As much as Gallagher is a reliable midfield option who has energy + doesn't miss many games, his passing is not good enough to be a starting midfielder at a top club. 

KDH is an upgrade on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strike said:

As much as Gallagher is a reliable midfield option who has energy + doesn't miss many games, his passing is not good enough to be a starting midfielder at a top club. 

KDH is an upgrade on him. 

Not enough of an upgrade to warrant slapping 30m on him. 

Edited by TheHulk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...