Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

 

One of the clubs in for him are Leicester. Would be a good idea to send him to an upper Championship level team and let him play 30+ games this season 

than play rotation mid at Crystal Palace 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

One of the clubs in for him are Leicester. Would be a good idea to send him to an upper Championship level team and let him play 30+ games this season 

than play rotation mid at Crystal Palace 

Yep. Or perhaps send him to Brighton who are going to lose both Caicedo and Mac Allister. He likely wouldn’t play every match of course but learning the De Zerbi way for a season could be brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spanish publication Nacional claims that Chelsea have made an offer in an attempt to lure Mbappe to Stamford Bridge this summer.

The Blues have apparently offered €120m (£103m) and a selection of four players in order to get a deal over the line with Chelsea ‘willing to do anything’ to get the transfer done.

It is understood that new Chelsea boss Mauricio Pochettino ‘wants to meet again with his former pupil’, after managing him at PSG, and ‘intends to take advantage’ of his contract situation.

Raheem Sterling, Marc Cucurella, Cesar Azpilicueta and Romelu Lukaku are the four players included as part of negotiations in the hope that Chelsea can get some money knocked off PSG’s huge €150-€200m asking price for Mbappe.

The report adds that Sterling – who only joined from Manchester City a year ago – ‘could take Mbappe’s place at PSG’ after being ‘unable to live up to expectations’.

Cucurella and Azpilicueta ‘could also be part of the deal’ while Pochettino ‘would also allow Romelu Lukaku to leave for PSG if Mbappé can arrive that way’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a fucking disasterclass buy Mr Glass Pulisic was. £58m transfer fee plus massive salary added in for a total of almost £100m

and we are going to get only around £15m for him it looks like

he had one decent season (his first here) and has been shit and so often injured since then

smdh

🤬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Vesper said:

What a fucking disasterclass buy Mr Glass Pulisic was. £58m transfer fee plus massive salary added in for a total of almost £100m

and we are going to get only around £15m for him it looks like

he had one decent season (his first here) and has been shit and so often injured since then

smdh

🤬

we spend lot of money  but most of our transfer are a disaster 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/06/2023 at 17:21, TheHulk said:

No one is spreading anything, lucio and me told you already Romano has been using his name as close as a few days ago but you choose to ignore this, dunno why he deleted now. Maybe you should be more upset with the Chelsea fans that actually run and promote news websites and use Boehly's name than some nobodies on a forum like us whom no one cares about.

As for Potter he was an useless sack of shit, and no matter how many years he remained wouldn't have changed anything because he lacked any tactical awareness, playing players out of positions regularly and killing the confidence of guys like Mudryk with his half time subs, guy was trash and everyone knew it.

Boehly is NOT running our transfers, he is not picking out who we buy and who we do not

I do not give a toss how some journos phrase it

he stepped down as interim sporting director in early January

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2023/01/09/todd-boehly-stands-chelseas-interim-sporting-director/

06ba845a8c984582c7aa31b21bc4aa53.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/06/2023 at 17:26, TheHulk said:

Does investment in youth count towards FFP or not, someone said yesterday it doesn't.

that buy likely doesn't count , as he probably going to start off as an academy player

If he WAS added to the first team from the start, then it would count

http://www.kridalegal.com/post.php?id=27#:

The FFP does not count the expenditure done by clubs for establishing and maintaining youth academies but they do count the profit made by the Clubs after selling the Young Academy Graduate. This comes in as a two way escape route for the clubs as their expenditure would be low but profits will be added. This provokes the Clubs to have extensive youth academy setup where they have many players but they are not given any opportunity to represent the club at First team level. They are there just to hone their skills and make them look like a progressive talent so that these players can then be transferred to another club willing to pay for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You