Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

They are on about spunking 70M on a winger and yet still ignoring the fact we need a fucking striker

At this point, it’s beyond unacceptable. If this happens, this board will loose the backing from soo many. Many fans are not happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

🔵 Chelsea to hold new talks over Garnacho and other attackers…club will also assess midfield options before window closes.

Chelsea will hold more talks over attackers, including Gittens and Tel, over the coming days before deciding whether to submit a bid for any of them.
 

(via@MattLaw)

Edited by mkh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Law : Chelsea looking at Garnacho, Tel, Gittens and assessing if they'll bid. Also looking at strikers for the summer - can accelerate if a deal is possible now. Delap and Sesko on the list, no Vlahovic. 

Edited by Strike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already see some of our fans getting excited about Matt Law saying we’re “assessing midfield options,” but any move we do make there will almost surely be Ugo returning from loan. We won’t want to fuck with Strasbourg’s season and piss their fans off even more than they already are with BlueCo by recalling Santos.

Don’t think anyone should get excited as if we’re going to go out there and buy some great new midfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a striker to complete/rotate with Jackson and the new striker needs to be of a different type too.

On the other hand, our level of play including against weaker opposition at the SB suggests we need a lot more than that.

Like I stated before, I like Garnacho at the right price, but he's also very raw at 21yo. His ceiling is a hell lot higher than Mudryk's and he can press high with intensity, so a huge upgrade.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

We need a striker to complete/rotate with Jackson and the new striker needs to be of a different type too.

On the other hand, our level of play including against weaker opposition at the SB suggests we need a lot more than that.

Like I stated before, I like Garnacho at the right price, but he's also very raw at 21yo. His ceiling is a hell lot higher than Mudryk's and he can press high with intensity, so a huge upgrade.

Does Garnacho get into the team ahead of Neto or Sancho or even Madueke rn? its not like we don't have options for the wing + we have Paez and Estevan coming in July. 

Why's the board prioritizing Garnacho, Gittens or Tel over a striker or even a GK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Strike said:

Does Garnacho get into the team ahead of Neto or Sancho or even Madueke rn? its not like we don't have options for the wing + we have Paez and Estevan coming in July. 

Why's the board prioritizing Garnacho, Gittens or Tel over a striker or even a GK

Above madueke yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mário César said:

Above madueke yes

Garnacho is worse in every measurable way, much less of an all round player than Madueke, much more selfish. THAN MADUEKE.

Very strange signing if we go after him, only makes any sense if its a mutual backscratch with them buying from the infamous Chelsea bomb squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...