Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

If we had been able to sell Chalobah and Broja instead of just loaning them on deadline day....what a waste of a transfer window.  The only benefit was offloading Lukaku. 

and Chilwell, etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  • David Datro Fofana is still expected to leave Chelsea in the next days. Turkey, Greece, Portugal, Saudi and Holland among markets being explored to pick best option. Hoffenheim and Sunderland opened talks to sign Datro on Deadline Day but negotiations collapsed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mkh said:

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

brilliant profit if we get that 

20m quid more than we paid for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, manpe said:

If we are serious about his development (or upping his value), then loaning to Brazil makes no sense.

Couldn't agree more.

Flamengo actually has the best striker in teh country, Pedro, who flopped in Europe (Fiorentina), but is still better than what the other sides have there. He is recovering from a hammy, but should be back soon. So, it's likely Deivid wouldn't be starting too many matches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mkh said:

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

I'll believe it when I see him wearing the Al Nassr shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, manpe said:

If we are serious about his development (or upping his value), then loaning to Brazil makes no sense.

If we were that serious about his development, he would have been loaned out much earlier in the transfer window, especially considering he spent last season doing nothing in the reserves and then making up the numbers on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mkh said:

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

Al Nassr seemingly have a taste for Brazilian youngsters. They want some company for Wesley.

At least we have someone to drop a few should they not turn out to be much (quite likely).

Edited by LAM09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

If we were that serious about his development, he would have been loaned out much earlier in the transfer window, especially considering he spent last season doing nothing in the reserves and then making up the numbers on the bench. 

We tried offloading him to Strasbourg, it's pretty clear how much they give a fuck about his development. Hope Al Nassr comes for him as well.

Edited by TheHulk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Vegetable said:

Interesting to see how brutal revolving door business model Clearlake adopted here. If you think about how absurdly long likes Kenedy or Baba Rahman were here, wow, night and day.

In one sense, the business model is good as ideally that's what you want to see, if the player doesn't fit or develop, flip them or sell them off. 

The only issue with the Clearlake approach is that they hoarded too many players in consecutive transfer windows.  Just look at the LW situation, you got Mudryk, Neto, Sancho, Sterling, Carney, even Felix all being paid from Chelsea's books this season. 

If we had a clearer plan, maybe Mudryk, Carney and a few others would be playing regularly elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said:

In one sense, the business model is good as ideally that's what you want to see, if the player doesn't fit or develop, flip them or sell them off. 

The only issue with the Clearlake approach is that they hoarded too many players in consecutive transfer windows.  Just look at the LW situation, you got Mudryk, Neto, Sancho, Sterling, Carney, even Felix all being paid from Chelsea's books this season. 

If we had a clearer plan, maybe Mudryk, Carney and a few others would be playing regularly elsewhere. 

Neto and Felix are not true LWers, and Carney is an AMF/CMF, never a winger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You