Jump to content

Ben Chilwell


Strike
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Rekin said:

Can we try to remember that Chilwell is a decent player that has not peaked yet? 

I strongly suspect that Chelsea knows what they are trying to accomplish, and if they are prioritizing Chilwell over other signings (not counting Havertz as I am confident it will happen) then they do so because they strongly believe in the player's quality.

Let's keep in mind that we live in a world where Maguire and Rice are valued at 80m.

Stop talking sense mate, there's mindless overreacting going on here and an agenda that needs pushing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Did anyone expected Robertson to become this good when Liverpool signed him?

They are same height and Andy was also 23 when Pool signed him.

the dippers paid £8m for him

we might end up paying 10 times that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Puliiszola said:

Are we actually going to pay 80m£ for him

 80m £ !!!!!!! For Ben bloody chillwell. 😅😅

Marina wouldn't pay more than 80mil euros for Havertz. She sure isn't going to pay more than that for Chilwell. Sky reported before that Leicester softened their stance on their initial asking price. People are just speculating. We don't even know if the info that came out today is real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not really hearing or reading anything concrete so I doubt we get such abreakthrough overnight in a potential 80m deal

The Times now confirming yesterday’s reports that there’s been a breakthrough in the talks and that deal is very close:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/chelsea-closing-in-on-ben-chilwell-jjb93qh76


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rapkun said:

Marina wouldn't pay more than 80mil euros for Havertz. She sure isn't going to pay more than that for Chilwell. Sky reported before that Leicester softened their stance on their initial asking price. People are just speculating. We don't even know if the info that came out today is real.

£80m she would do, and we would split it up into 2 or 3 payments, with £50m going this year, then £30m next, or, if Bayer would do it, £15m and £15m

Bayer will never sell him for only €80m, that is only £72m

pre covid the were talking €120m (£108m)

pre covid Dortmund wanted €140m for Sancho (£127m), and they said nope to anything under €115m or so (£104m) which is around a 18% (little less) drop

Bayer will drop the price on Havertz, but not by €40m, which is a 33% drop, or almost double the % of Sancho's drop (so far) in terms of discount

40m euros is shitload to a medium sized club like Bayer, and they are under little to no true pressure to sell him as he has not put in a transfer request

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You