Jump to content

Chelsea 2-1 Spurs


Jase
 Share

Man of the Match  

82 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is Man of the Match?

    • Courtois
      2
    • Moses
      38
    • Azpilicueta
      4
    • Luiz
      1
    • Cahill
      0
    • Alonso
      0
    • Kante
      4
    • Matic
      4
    • Pedro
      9
    • Hazard
      1
    • Costa
      19
    • Willian (sub)
      0
    • Ivanovic (sub)
      0
    • Oscar (sub)
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Jason said:

It's not just Cahill and Azpi. It's almost the entire team. Matic, Pedro, Costa, Kante etc.

Yeah, i remember i had a discussion about this with "Excalibur" a couple of weeks ago in the Conte thread. 

About the lack of abillity on the ball from our back 3 and 2 man midfield.

Looking ahead, if we want to have a chance to go up against the big teams in the CL we're going to need to upgrade in several areas.

LCB(Cahill), LWB(Alonso), LDM(Matic), RAM(Pedro). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Styles said:

Spurs were really strong in the first 30 minutes but they killed themselves with that pressing - I don't care how fit you are, you will never keep that going for an entire game unless the whole team on HGH.

Good comeback win and now on to the next one.

True but i don't think we should forget how vital Pedro's goal was just before halftime. Dominating a game like that, using so much energy only to be level 1-1 at halftime must have been a massive mental hit for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Is that what it's called ?.It's written and read by pricks whatever it's name !

Yep. ENAsO_dv.jpg

This is your guy. His name is Gary, but his mom calls him FLAV, he is a spurs fan and absolutely hates chelsea! Owner of the forum and the podcast that goes with it! The Master Cunt, a true cum biscuit! And a real life walking talking fanny!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2016-11-26 at 3:21 PM, OhForAGreavsie said:

Totally agree with you about Dembele.  He was outstanding, especially in the first half. If we could add someone with that fluidity to our midfield,  someone exactly of the type you describe, it would represent a huge improvement.

100% problem with him is he can't stay healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheIceMan said:

Yep. ENAsO_dv.jpg

This is your guy. His name is Gary, but his mom calls him FLAV, he is a spurs fan and hates chelsea! Owner of the forum and the podcast that goes with it! The Master Cunt, a true cum biscuit! And a reallife walking tallking fanny!

 

Looks like a right middle class mummy's boy. What's the difference between a coach full of Spurs fans and a hedgehog ?. On the hedgehog the pricks are on the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Belgiannutt said:

Yeah, i remember i had a discussion about this with "Excalibur" a couple of weeks ago in the Conte thread. 

About the lack of abillity on the ball from our back 3 and 2 man midfield.

Looking ahead, if we want to have a chance to go up against the big teams in the CL we're going to need to upgrade in several areas.

LCB(Cahill), LWB(Alonso), LDM(Matic), RAM(Pedro). 

Very much agree with this. We're rolling high at the moment and I think the only flaw in our game is the way we handle high intensity teams. In order to deal with intense pressing teams you must have technically good midfielders to spray the ball left and right with ease. This is why I think that the game next week-end is our biggest test so far. I think Conte should go for the 3-5-2 this time and add an extra midfielder in there. Guardiola is definitely going to use a three man midfield and look to win the midfield battle. I know this, we know this because this is what he does, he said it many times that by winning the midfield battle you win the game. It is his philosophy of football so I think it'll be suicidal for Conte to go with only with Matic and Kante as his midfielders in this game. Against a very capable and comfortable on the ball City midfield.

A ball playing LCB is needed I agree with you. Also a technically good midfielder to partner Kante (someone in the mould of Mousa Dembele, but way more faster). For the right forward position my dream signing would be Aubameyang. And definitely two wing backs, either to cover for Marcos Alonso or two proven ones. Saying Chelsea end the season on a high, we cannot let the mistakes from the past hunt us again - squad must be improved no matter how good certain players are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the fans being caught chanting been filmed again..know obviously it happens and it's what the media love but surley ain't just us! every club has idiots ours just gets dragged into the spotlight a lot. not that's any excuse just way always painted we're the worse fans blah de blah.

Ashley coles tweets though lol..always a blue :-D 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched the BT Sport post-match analysis earlier (god, they are awful!) and Redknapp couldn't have been more biased and bitter on his assessment of us. Shame they had on Zola on. Needed someone more outspoken to put Redknapp in his place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/11/2016 at 11:17 AM, OhForAGreavsie said:

Laughable. Saw my first game in 1973. Bought my first season ticket in 1976. (Cost me £22.) Only home game I've missed in decades was the eight nil against Villa. Stop making a fool of yourself.

Ahh sweet scent of self entitlement from a 'season ticket holder' way back when over 50% (guestimate) of Chelsea fans weren't even born yet.

I saw my first game in 2012, sorry I must be less of a Chelsea fan..I'll go back to my tele 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kezza said:

Ahh sweet scent of self entitlement from a 'season ticket holder' way back when over 50% (guestimate) of Chelsea fans weren't even born yet.

I saw my first game in 2012, sorry I must be less of a Chelsea fan..I'll go back to my tele 

I have never, ever, ever subscribed to the view that one Chelsea fan outranks another for ANY reason. One day, when you're bored out of your mind, you can search my posts. You will find that I've made that point many times.

The post to which you replied was my 'defence' against an accusation that I am not a real Chelsea fan, and that I was merely acting as if I was one. An accusation through which someone else was claiming to be a better Chelsea fan than me. In short, someone exhibiting the same behaviour of which you are accusing me.

I never claim to be a better Chelsea fan than anyone else but, by the same token, I don't accept anyone else claiming to be a bigger fan of this club than I am. I hope you'll have the integrity to apologise for the comment to which I am replying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's possible to be grateful for, respectful towards, and support the club of a Jew, and also be anti-Semitic. Which I don't believe these fans are. So this is a non-story.

This is like saying the word nigger in no context other than what i'm typing right now, and claiming it's racist. Or if you're shit-faced with your black friend of 10 years, and for some bizarre reason call him nigga to wind him up (I wouldn't do that; but I could never call that racism either in that context.) You're not suddenly racist for hitting a nerve that should be left untouched; you just know how to ruffle feathers. 

Some people go very far, but it's not that deep. It's teasing. In football, you insult and degrade your opponents, but that doesn't mean what you're saying has conviction behind it. It's trolling. You choose the words that provoke the most reaction and that's it. 

So why care what they chanted? Unless they're starting anti-Jew groups or throwing bottles exclusively at people they think for sure are Jewish, it's not anti-Semitic. 

There's no discrimination; all Spurs fans are the same to a Chelsea fan, Jewish or not. 

There's no hostility aimed specifically towards anyone Jewish; only towards Spurs fans and every non-Chelsea fan in general.

And as for prejudice, anyone chanting such shit doesn't have a developed enough brain to even be prejudice. They just go home, eat their pie and never think about Jews again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't news. Theyre not anti semitic its just having a go at Sp"rs. Most teams that play them do the same. They do the pretend blades of a helicopter to simulate Matthew Harding dying. They call themselves the Yid Army. They spit on women and kids. It goes on. That reporter should have been around in the 70s and 80s, then he'd know what real rivalry was.

A non story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

I have never, ever, ever subscribed to the view that one Chelsea fan outranks another for ANY reason. One day, when you're bored out of your mind, you can search my posts. You will find that I've made that point many times.

The post to which you replied was my 'defence' against an accusation that I am not a real Chelsea fan, and that I was merely acting as if I was one. An accusation through which someone else was claiming to be a better Chelsea fan than me. In short, someone exhibiting the same behaviour of which you are accusing me.

I never claim to be a better Chelsea fan than anyone else but, by the same token, I don't accept anyone else claiming to be a bigger fan of this club than I am. I hope you'll have the integrity to apologise for the comment to which I am replying.

Sorry mate, its a non argument but it grinds my gears when fans claim season ticket status. Admittedly only came in the arse end of the conversation. Glad you think that way. 

Us down under wake up at all hours of the morn to watch Chels..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kezza said:

Sorry mate, its a non argument but it grinds my gears when fans claim season ticket status. Admittedly only came in the arse end of the conversation. Glad you think that way. 

Us down under wake up at all hours of the morn to watch Chels..

Been there, done that.

2 AM scheduled kickoff for Washington Monday night games meant a 5:30 AM finish, with work starting at nine. And I'm talking before the games were available on satellite telly and other platforms. Back in the day, it was a case of trying to  latch on to an intermittent medium wave (AM) signal which was bounced by satellite from the States to Frankfurt and then broadcast to US Army personnel stationed in Germany.

Sometimes, when it was a big game, and the reception was particularly bad, it meant dragging yourself out of bed, diving into the car to cruise around in search of a signal.

These were no balmy, Antipodean nights either. I'm talking cold, wet, miserable midwinter London. 😊 Compared to that, buying a season ticket at RFK, or FedEx field, must have been a doddle!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...