Kalidou Koulibaly

[nore_ega 8]

Maybe we should move on from this one, but at least the board tried their best with improved bids. Their chairman Laurentiis what a character he is no wonder why higuain didn't what to spend another minute with him. 

[Hybrid Angel 2,130]

1 minute ago, LondonsFinest said:

Wellp, didn't know that. If what are you saying is true, which I presume it is, then we are well and truly fucked.

I wouldn't say that yet, it seems that our board is taking its time in this transfer window and a new bid could be coming but I just hope all this waiting doesn't come biting our ass by the end of the transfer window.

[!Hazard! 3,394]

11 hours ago, LAM09 said:

They have supposedly rejected a £42m offer. I thing he's getting a bit too expensive for my taste.

Napoli, Porto, Spurs, Everton.....never ever do business with these bunch of cunts.

[LAM09 7,043]

Napoli, Porto, Spurs, Everton.....never ever do business with these bunch of cunts.

Could add Roma to that list as well. Some clubs are just out there to try and F* us over.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

32 minutes ago, Hybrid Angel said:

Calciomercato is really bad. Carlo Laudisa works for Gazzeta and was the one who said Napoli rejected a 50m and he is the most reliable man in Italian media after Di Marzio.

How do you know all that ? I look the last 2 years and Gazzeta have many missed reports.

Also just by using my basic understanding, if Chelsea is only oriented on Koulibaly then they're surely certain that they get him otherwise they would look at Mustafi or they are stupid.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

On the other hand. Napoli seeing Stones going for 55m€. Why Koulibaly should be cheaper ?

I like KK A LOT by I liked him more when he was 30m€ player.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/kalidou-koulibaly-to-chelsea-blues-confident-of-deal-for-napoli-defender-despite-rejected-42m-bid-a3315371.html

[Sovieticus 743]

20 minutes ago, !Hazard! said:

Napoli, Porto, Spurs, Everton.....never ever do business with these bunch of cunts.

But why are they cunts? They have the players that usually play in starting 11 and are crucial to them. Why would someone want to sell them for cheap if there is someone willing to pay a shit of money. Wouldn't you do that? Let's say someone comes in for Hazard, would you sell him for 40m pounds? I wouldn't think so.

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

On the other hand. Napoli seeing Stones going for 55m€. Why Koulibaly should be cheaper ?

I like KK A LOT by I liked him more when he was 30m€ player.

Very good point, Citeh signing Stones really has ruined the market.

[Hybrid Angel 2,130]

34 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

How do you know all that ? I look the last 2 years and Gazzeta have many missed reports.

Also just by using my basic understanding, if Chelsea is only oriented on Koulibaly then they're surely certain that they get him otherwise they would look at Mustafi or they are stupid.

Who said anything about Gazetta? They are not very reliable but Carlo Laudisa one of their journalists is one of the most reliable when it comes to transfer news and he said Napoli rejected a 50m bid. 

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

10 minutes ago, Hybrid Angel said:

Who said anything about Gazetta? They are not very reliable but Carlo Laudisa one of their journalists is one of the most reliable when it comes to transfer news and he said Napoli rejected a 50m bid. 

First time I heard about the guy. How do you know he's reliable ? 

 

[Hybrid Angel 2,130]

13 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

First time I heard about the guy. How do you know he's reliable ? 

 

I've heard about his credibility from Italians all over the internet.