Alexandre Pato

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

Ha

HA

HA

[Milan 17,853]

2 hours ago, xPetrCechx said:

Ha

HA

HA

 

What does this suppos to mean?

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

2 minutes ago, milan.cech said:

 

What does this suppos to mean?

I stopped to cry about this transfer and started to laugh.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Actually he is a strong competitor of Willian for my POTY. All other players got minus mark in my book, because of our bad period longer than our good period along the season so far. Pato got 0 mark, and he is in the 2nd place of my list, because he did it with less minutes on the bench.

[Milan 17,853]

24 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said:

I stopped to cry about this transfer and started to laugh.

Cry? Whatever...

[Special Juan 27,424]

What a waste of time this loan was.

[Vybz Kartel 1,613]

At least Papy Djilobodji made one appearance 

[Special Juan 27,424]

Wonder if his pre season training didn't go to plan.

Absolute stupid loan.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Don't know why people are upset he's not playing.. He's clearly shit. If Hiddink doesn't rate him enough to play him, but trusts Traore who cares about Pato? Lol

[Topico 165]

3 minutes ago, LDN Blue said:

Don't know why people are upset he's not playing.. He's clearly shit. If Hiddink doesn't rate him enough to play him, but trusts Traore who cares about Pato? Lol

Ivanovic, Matic, Cahill are shit and they play somehow. Shows that Hiddnik  don't have clue.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

9 minutes ago, Topico said:

Ivanovic, Matic, Cahill are shit and they play somehow. Shows that Hiddnik  don't have clue.

Down to a lack of depth if anything, neither of any problems Pato solves. Because Hiddink has to play shit players, you want him to add another one? At the expense of a younger, sharper, talent?

[Topico 165]

Start him vs West Ham please. He can't be worse than Pedro. 

[Jase 43,479]

What's the point of Pato really?

I get it that he needed some pre-season training work when he came but it's nearly 2 months already and he's still not playing?! At least Miazga already got some game time with the U21s yesterday but if we aren't going to let Pato play for the U21s to build up his fitness, if we aren't going to play him in the first team, then what's the point of him being here?!

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

What's the point of Pato really?

I get it that he needed some pre-season training work when he came but it's nearly 2 months already and he's still not playing?! At least Miazga already got some game time with the U21s yesterday but if we aren't going to let Pato play for the U21s to build up his fitness, if we aren't going to play him in the first team, then what's the point of him being here?!

Pointless.

[Beepu 1,714]

I'm sure he will score in each of our last 9 games and we will finish at 6th or 7th place the least. That's the master plan to begin with, to make him a cult hero. Or he will make 0 appearances for Chelsea. 

[LAM09 6,744]

The board seriously needs to be dismantled. Another signing no one wanted but them

[Essien19 1,415]

but but but low risk high reward, at least that's what some guys told me before the loan, so no matter what it's an absolute genius move by the legend.

ahh seriously, can't get my head around why he can't even make the bench but i'm not arrogant enough to claim that i know more than Guus about footie.
Guus has done a more than okay job so far, yes, i think some of the players would have performed for anyone bar Jose, but i give credit where credit is due.
If he thinks Pato isn't up for it, so be it. We have bigger problems than moaning about whether or not Pato plays, no matter what Guus does, there's always an opportunity to moan.
That's our way, the right way, the Chelsea way.

[Tomo 21,733]

Part of the reason Pato hasn't got a look in so far is that Traore has beeb taking his chances in the team really well.

If we let Pato come straight in over Bertrand, the same of you slating the board over a supposedly pointless signing would be the same ones moaning about how Pato is blocking our youth.