Eva Carneiro Leaves Chelsea

[Rhino's Skin 972]

9 hours ago, Superblue_1986 said:

Right or wrong, what annoys me the most is it is yet another needless event that has left us with more negative headlines and reason for mud to be thrown at us.

Funny how it seems the case between Chelsea and Eva has dominated headlines, and Mourinho's case and any negative press has been nothing more than a side-note. Although now he is United's manager, I'm not surprised he's gone from zero to hero in many people's eyes in the press.

The case was dominated between club and her because it is an employment tribunal.

Apart from incidents that happened most of the talk would have been about procedures followed etc

[Amblève. 4,995]

13 hours ago, Styles said:

Who cares? If Fearn is happy to get treated like a piece of shit for doing his job then good for him. Eva wasn't and that's what you're failing to understand.

Exactly. He would have had the same right to a trial as Carneiro and he didn't make use of it for reasons which we don't know. Nothing to do with "tits" or "attention whore".

[Melanicus 5,208]

46 minutes ago, Amblève. said:

Exactly. He would have had the same right to a trial as Carneiro and he didn't make use of it for reasons which we don't know. Nothing to do with "tits" or "attention whore".

Come on, don't be so fucking naive. If she had dick like John does nobody would even bat an eye and it wouldn't blow up at all. A man would never get 1 mil out of his boss calling him a son of a bitch. John knows this, otherwise he would also sue the club. He didn't because it's better for him to suck it up and continue working at Chelsea (he will earn more money here than anywhere else). Double standards at its finest.

Eva just wanted to milk as much money as possible from the club. She saw her chance, manipulated and got the support of media, different woman rights "groups", justice warriors. "I'm a vulnerable woman and that guy told me bad things, protect me now please <3" and she made a good profit on it. Fair play to her for this, but she is nothing more than a gold digger. Don't try to maker her a hero, because she isn't.

I'm not protecting Mourinho, he was a cunt in this situation too. But she is an even bigger cunt. Fair play to her (she got what she wanted - a lot of money for nothing), but she doesn't get my respect.

[Rhino's Skin 972]

2 hours ago, Amblève. said:

Exactly. He would have had the same right to a trial as Carneiro and he didn't make use of it for reasons which we don't know. Nothing to do with "tits" or "attention whore".

She was "encouraged" by certain rights groups etc and lets get it right...it was not a trial.

Had Fearn decided to do anything and gone for constructive dismissal, then it would have been capped at £78k.

Chelsea went through the right process of offering her a way back to her job and at the end of the day, all the tribunal are looking at are employers and employees and not Chelsea, Eva and Mourinho

[Roquila 1,335]

1.2 fucking million. Let that sink in. 

ONE POINT TWO FUCKING MILLION. 

Wish I had a pussy.

[Beepu 1,714]

Am I the only one that doesn't think she's "pretty". She's definitely not ugly but I never understood people's obsession with her appearance. 

1.2m though... Hory sheet

 

[Blue_Fox_ 2,086]

3 minutes ago, Beepu said:

Am I the only one that doesn't think she's "pretty". She's definitely not ugly but I never understood people's obsession with her appearance. 

1.2m though... Hory sheet

 

She looks her age and she is too short for my taste  Definitely not an absolute beauty.

[Fulham Broadway 16,851]

1.2 million ?   and the rest...lot of media sources tioday say she has been given 5 million.

Shes milked the club and Hazard*, Oscar* and Ivanovich*

*allegedly

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,919]

24 minutes ago, Beepu said:

Am I the only one that doesn't think she's "pretty". She's definitely not ugly but I never understood people's obsession with her appearance. 

1.2m though... Hory sheet

 

I never really understood it either. I tried to give the Eva Carneiro appreciation thread an honest look, but I just ended up baffled.

[Styles 9,790]

3 hours ago, Amblève. said:

Exactly. He would have had the same right to a trial as Carneiro and he didn't make use of it for reasons which we don't know. Nothing to do with "tits" or "attention whore".

Yep. I hadn't realised just how many children we have on the forum. Imagine being so simple that you resort to shouting tits and p*ssy at anybody with a different take on this incident.

[Beepu 1,714]

27 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

I never really understood it either. I tried to give the Eva Carneiro appreciation thread an honest look, but I just ended up baffled.

I mean she's not unattractive but the publicity she got was as if she was the most beautiful woman in the world. Beauty is relative I guess. I only like asian girls and maybe she is the most beautiful woman in the world for someone else.

[chrismada9 1,948]

That moment when you realise Chelsea have spent more on Eva Carneiro than they have in the actual transfer market...

[manpe 10,861]

Didn't she reject the reported 1.2 million? I think she got more now.

[Miki-Liki 405]

6 hours ago, Beepu said:

Am I the only one that doesn't think she's "pretty". She's definitely not ugly but I never understood people's obsession with her appearance. 

1.2m though... Hory sheet

 

 

Probably because women are a rare sight in football. Although I do think she's pretty.

[MichaelDance 552]

All I can say is that bitch can fuck off now, I respected her and thought she would be a professional. Sadly when she sued the club I lost that respect and when she declined 1.2 Million I respected her even less. Now she can go and work for a lower club who take in trash gold diggers.

[Clevemayer 764]

2 hours ago, manpe said:

Didn't she reject the reported 1.2 million? I think she got more now.

 

I pretty much think, the club said to her.  we've offered you money good money for settling, you wanted to go to trial and this and this is what we will do to you and your career, you will look like a greedy bitch and no one will ever appoint you again... but hey... just leave it take the xum X now and we will say we apreciated your work... they never ever gaver her 1.2 or even more money... At the beginning the chelsea lawyers made clear what they would make her look like, offered her to rebuild bridges to mou she declined, offered her money and to get back into the team she declined she wanted additional 40% payrise, leaked informations allegedly....

I think, chelsea agreed that announcement and she is te biggest looser...

 

come on guys don't act like idiots... I never liked her seriously... but she isn't ugly at all... all of you were shagging your d*** when essien was whinin her celebrating the trophy...

 

she isn't what I like... but for 40+ she wouldn't be the women I would put at the last place if I wasn't married with the (to me) prettiest women...

 

Spoiler

 

[Styles 9,790]

2 hours ago, MichaelDance said:

All I can say is that bitch can fuck off now, I respected her and thought she would be a professional. Sadly when she sued the club I lost that respect and when she declined 1.2 Million I respected her even less. Now she can go and work for a lower club who take in trash gold diggers.

Seek help asap. You clearly have a hatred of women.

Scared to smile? They call you ugly? Life is harsh.

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

I just can't believe some of the comments I'm reading. The bare bones are a woman takes a man to court and she's called a cunt, a goal digger a bitch and ugly. It's like reading the musings of a group of spotty teenagers talking about their teacher. These sort of comments reflect badly on all Chelsea fans and make us look like misogynist halfwits.