kellzfresh 7,229 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 He used to be a very good finisher and hardworking. He's also two footed like hazard, which is a very underrated attribute this days. Would be a no brainer if he's anywhere as good as 2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarlow 458 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 I would love Pedro at Chelsea, not only is he very good on the ball, his movement running in behind defences is top quality like Costa, we would be a nightmare to play against with Costa and Pedro making runs in behind, Fabregas and possibly Koke splitting defences apart and Hazard terrorising teams as always. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 have not seen much of him in the last 2 years now. so hard to judge. a lot will depend on his value that barca set. but considering that barca have a transfer ban and wont be able to replace him, would they even be willing to sell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismada9 1,948 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 A great "cheaper" option if no-one else is available! I'd love to see Pedro at Chelsea.. for sure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yuvala 2,167 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Seems like a very good deal if we can get him for cheap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nadavTKL 1,787 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 but considering that barca have a transfer ban and wont be able to replace him, would they even be willing to sell?True. Selling Pedro means they have no bench for those 3 spots. Unless they're really going to trust their young AMs- Munir, Halilović, Deulofeu. Last two are on loan this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukakutoStamford 779 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yes please. Relatively cheap and would be a good foil with Hazard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 I don't know about you guys but I think we should be more ambitious than Pedro for our RW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 I don't know about you guys but I think we should be more ambitious than Pedro for our RW.What's wrong with Pedro? A change of scenery could put him back at his best, which is very, very good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukakutoStamford 779 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 I don't know about you guys but I think we should be more ambitious than Pedro for our RW.Don't have unlimited funds so I'd rather be more ambitious with someone like Pogba or Koke rather than splashing the pot for Bale or the glass tissue, Reus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,907 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 I don't know about you guys but I think we should be more ambitious than Pedro for our RW.Agree with this. Pedro is a very good player but I'd rather us sign someone both younger and better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,051 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 We need first team quality from now on. No more bench warmers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 We need first team quality from now on. No more bench warmers.which is why Pedro would be a great signing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,051 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 which is why Pedro would be a great signingWhat's he doing at Barca?Thought so! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dUMB 189 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 I don't know why we'd want him. I don't want him. Not good enough. Mou is not stupid, we're not gonna buy him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 What's he doing at Barca?Thought so!What's Cech doing here?Luis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,051 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 What's Cech doing here?Luis?Luis was bought for fun, whilst Cech is still here because he loves Chelsea. He'll be first choice wherever he goes in the Summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,698 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 which is why Pedro would be a great signingWhy would we take out Barca's garbage? We are supposed to compete Barca. They have Neymar, Messi and Suarez, we won't get any closer with Pedro We should sign young promising players or real world class players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 What's he doing at Barca?Thought so!are you serious?you do realise he has Messi, Neymar and Suarez ahead of hiim???would Bale, Reus, Sanchez or Griezmann start ahead of any of them? Thought not! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Why would we take out Barca's garbage? We are supposed to compete Barca. They have Neymar, Messi and Suarez, we won't get any closer with Pedro We should sign young promising players or real world class players.he is hardly garbage, Hazard would struggle to start for Barcelona! they have the best front 3 in the world, we already have a better GK and Defence then them and if we sign Koke we will have a better midfield also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.