Jump to content

Arda Turan


Adnane
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 835
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if we will bring turan he will be a sub anyway as he is playing on the left wing, so hazard will not go to the bench, so in that case yes i prefer to develop a young chelsea lad. by your way of thinking why invest in youth anyway?! just buy players all the time. what about the Identity and soul of the club? yes i prefer one or even two years without titles and to give the youth a chance that we will be a club that young english lads know they can develop at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I literally have to change my idea of squad every 2 hours ...

If Arda signs, great, if not it's not the end of the world.

Vidal and Griezmann are more important but Griezmann deal has stalled very badly. I don't think at all that Arda signing will affect possibility of Griezmann but it looks that Chelsea want to sign someone. Is Griezmann looking unachievable now regardless of Arda ? Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good enough for the best team on the planet to spend €35m on but Gilvorak thinks he's a serious downgrade on Oscar.

Good enough for Barca but not good enough for us apparently.

:doh:

Honestly please try to use your brain before posting such things. It should be common sense that the situation is a world apart.

Barcelona is in a position to sign a player like Turan, because they have 3 of the best attackers in the world(3 out of top5). They will play 90%+ games of Barcelona.

If we want to reach the level of Barca we should try to sign a better player then Turan, who will play sparingly for Barca. Barca would never sign Turan if they didn't have the best attacking trio in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:doh:

Honestly please try to use your brain before posting such things. It should be common sense that the situation is a world apart.

Barcelona is in a position to sign a player like Turan, because they have 3 of the best attackers in the world(3 out of top5). They will play 90%+ games of Barcelona.

If we want to reach the level of Barca we should try to sign a better player then Turan, who will play sparingly for Barca. Barca would never sign Turan if they didn't have the best attacking trio in the world.

And who, oh wise one, do you suggest we sign that's both available and possible for a fee that's not absolutely mental?

I'm sure I'll be waiting for a while for you to get back to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many outlets are going to look stupid at the end of this. Wherever he goes a lot of people are going to have made false guessing comments.

A bit sick of this all now really. Would much rather us sign other players who I have mentioned before but he wouldn't be a bad option if the others aren't available.

I just want this whole convoluted bullshit saga to finish now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You