Juan Cuadrado

[Fernando 6,463]

We are a bunch of fools. We gave them Cuadrado as a loan last year and with that they didn't see enough to buy but get another loan.....

They have a lot of money but they can't buy our player just loan again, and we of course cave in like idiots. 

[BlueLyon 9,359]

3 year loan? Lol. 

Thats unbelievable. 

[Jase 43,479]

http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2016/08/cuadrado-back-to-juve.html?extcmp=SOCIA_TW_ENG_ARTICLES

3-year loan to Juve. THREE. YEARS.

[Jype 6,398]

Three year loan deal, first of a kind surely.

Loan fee €5M and €20M to make the move permanent should he make a certain amount of appearances for Juve. Surely the amount of games needed to trigger the buyout needs to be ridiculously low which will 100% be met, because otherwise that'd mean essentially just selling him for €5M cause his contract at Chelsea was up in 2019 anyway. 

[the wes 7,212]

Cuadrado returned to Juventus in another temporary deal for €5 million plus a conditional obligation to buy the full registration rights of Cuadrado from Chelsea for an additional €20 million, after playing certain number of matches. Chelsea would also received a maximum of €4 million bonuses, making the fee potentially raise to €29 million

[Special Juan 27,429]

A fucking 3 year loan? I mean come on what is the point, just buy him FFS because it's clear we don't want him.

[Fernando 6,463]

Are you guys even shock?

When you have a board like ours what good can you expect?

[Blue_Fox_ 2,086]

And I thought I couldn't read any more bullshit after the Luiz deal. Rofl. I'm being left baffled today.

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,919]

One of the biggest cowards ever to put on blue.

 

I hope Willian and Brazil put 10 past him this international break.

[DYC. 7,542]

Joke of a transfer.

[manpe 10,861]

What if Juventus were the only one who wanted him/were willing to pay his salary? In this case I think the clubs compromised, because we didn't want him, got him off the wage bill and added a clause to make the move permanent for a decent amount of money. What is the problem exactly? When nobody else wants the player, but we need to get rid, then we aren't in a position to do everything on our own terms.

[manpe 10,861]

What if Juventus were the only one who wanted him/were willing to pay his salary? In this case I think the clubs compromised, because we didn't want him, got him off the wage bill and added a clause to make the move permanent for a decent amount of money. What is the problem exactly? When nobody else wants the player, but we need to get rid, then we aren't in a position to do everything on our own terms.

[Magic Lamps 11,653]

Before we condemn anyone, we should wait for some inside on how this turns out. We could barely have sold him for much more than 20m and if he has to reach like 20 games over 3 years for the deal to become permanent it is the best possible outcome.

[David I.M. 7]

I don't know very well the situation, but cuadrado didn't want to play in Chelsea and He returned to juve? In my opinion 20 mln is a too Low price, chelsea Has probably some kind of deal with Juventus  ( Conte is also an ex player and trainer of juve)

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

Pussy...

[LondonsFinest 692]

They are avoiding FFP by paying a fee for every year. Why are people surprised.

[Jype 6,398]

On 3.9.2016 at 3:56 PM, LondonsFinest said:

They are avoiding FFP by paying a fee for every year.

How exactly?

Because if they did buy him this window for a fixed transfer fee and no loan non-sense they'd be amortizing the whole fee over the contract length as far as FFP goes so I don't really see how it is any different paying an annual loan fee. What the deal in place does is allow Juventus a flexible payment schedule while also potentially saving them €10M if Cuadrado flops and that money is straight out of Chelsea's pocket.

[LondonsFinest 692]

On 4.09.2016 г. at 6:23 PM, Jype said:

How exactly?

Because if they did buy him this window for a fixed transfer fee and no loan non-sense they'd be amortizing the whole fee over the contract length as far as FFP goes so I don't really see how it is any different paying an annual loan fee. What the deal in place does is allow Juventus a flexible payment schedule while also potentially saving them €10M if Cuadrado flops and that money is straight out of Chelsea's pocket.

He has three years left on his contract. We wanted 20 million euro, Juventus neither could afford it, nor did they want to.

Far as I know, we are getting 5 or 6 million paid yearly, so basically, given last years, we;ve sold him back losing only a couple of millions.