RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Montella said he is going nowhere. We will see until when this will gonna last. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDY 1,290 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Willian cost £32m.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2403972/Willian-completes-32m-Chelsea-Mourinho-helps-land-work-permit.html£25.5mhttp://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/8893587/transfer-news-chelsea-complete-signing-of-willian-from-anzhi-makhachkala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,056 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 £25.5mhttp://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/8893587/transfer-news-chelsea-complete-signing-of-willian-from-anzhi-makhachkalaThat's the first I have heard of that figure. I'm more than sure it was £30m+, and that figure is stated in most articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea Legend 11 4,062 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 No need Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,056 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 €35m that's his alleged buyout.We're talking about Willian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 That's the first I have heard of that figure. I'm more than sure it was £30m+, and that figure is stated in most articles.Maybe you mixed it up with Spurs offer, their reported bid indeed 30 millions pounds accepted, and set to have a medical. But we hijacked it by offering 25+ millions accepted by Anzhi, and Willian opted to join us instead. Sounds great if true, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,056 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Maybe you mixed it up with Spurs offer, their reported bid indeed 30 millions pounds accepted, and set to have a medical. But we hijacked it by offering 25+ millions accepted by Anzhi, and Willian opted to join us instead. Lol.The £30m+ fee is everywhere. I can't see several outlets printing the wrong figure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 The £30m+ fee is everywhere. I can't see several outlets printing the wrong figure.I have googled it, everything related with Willian and 30 millions pounds was Tottenham bid. Mind you post your reference link? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,056 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 I have googled it, everything related with Willian and 30 millions pounds was Tottenham bid. Mind you post your reference link?I posted it previously - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2403972/Willian-completes-32m-Chelsea-Mourinho-helps-land-work-permit.htmlHere's another - http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/425269/Mourinho-plans-45m-splure-on-Eto-o-and-Atsu-after-Willian-signs-on-at-ChelseaThere's plenty of sites that state the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBlues 4,050 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Ah yes, I f***ed up my keywords. Other newspapers reported 32 millions pounds. Only Sky reported it 25.5God knows who is right here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaFanUK 1,014 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Shit.That is obvious, otherwise we would have triggered it straight off. I'd still bet that soon as Salah or Schurrle are out, Cuadrado is inWe dont even need to sell to buy, it's just newspapers putting 2 and 2 together simply because Jose is working this window, on a 1 in 1 out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaFanUK 1,014 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Off topic but genuine question, is there a more annoying account than WAGNH on twitter? Come across as so cocky and right when it comes to their transfer rumour analysis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDY 1,290 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Ah yes, I f***ed up my keywords. Other newspapers reported 32 millions pounds. Only Sky reported it 25.5God knows who is right here.Considering there is about 3/4 reported figures and the club never announced the fee, I'd hazard a guess that they are all just.. guessing. Nevertheless I'd tend to believe Sky over DM/Other papers recycling what DM have said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Off topic but genuine question, is there a more annoying account than WAGNH on twitter? Come across as so cocky and right when it comes to their transfer rumour analysisthe whole site is like that. lots of people trying to make themselves look better than you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 the whole site is like that. lots of people trying to make themselves look better than you.I like WAGNH. Never read their twitter page, or even knew it existed before now, but I visit the site daily. I can't say that I agree with every opinion expressed there, but they do try to report as many Chelsea related stories as they can so I find it a useful way to catch up. What's more, they write well. It's a rare pleasure these days to read articles by people who know how to use the English language. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 I like WAGNH. Never read their twitter page, or even knew it existed before now, but I visit the site every day. I can't say that I agree with every opinion expressed there but they do try to report every Chelsea related story so I find it useful to go there and get them all. What's more they write well. It's a rare pleasure these days to read articles by people who know how to use the English language.i agree thats its a good site. i check it alot too. but i dont find it to be a nice atmosphere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 If we bring in Cuadrado, then we'll have 4 established pen takers in Costa, Haz, Drogs and him. Vital for the the cup games ahead.Cuadrado isnt a regular penalty taker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidzeret 2,257 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 I like WAGNH. Never read their twitter page, or even knew it existed before now, but I visit the site daily. I can't say that I agree with every opinion expressed there, but they do try to report as many Chelsea related stories as they can so I find it a useful way to catch up. What's more, they write well. It's a rare pleasure these days to read articles by people who know how to use the English language.Really humorous style to it, especially the ones written by Paztdor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel1980 1,425 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 If you pick last season and chose per game, there are so many areas Willian is betterCuadrado vs WillianKey passes: 1,72 vs 2,48Chances created: 1,88 vs 2,56Shot acc.: 42% vs 48%Tackles won: 1,19 vs 1,40Successful take ons: 52,44% vs 56,72%Possession score: 2,73 vs 7,49Mind that this is in Cuadrado's best season to date. But my point aint that he is bad or worse than Willian, but that these stats can make any of the two ''better''. Real life is different though.Don't forget that last season Willian took set pieces, which made his chances created (and key passes) stats look better. But that aside, Willian really kind of regressed this season (I'm not talking about stats here). He seems even more toothless. I often feel like there's a higher chance of something happening when Ivanovic goes forward rather than when Willian does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rising Sun 711 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Hopefully he is more productive going forward, but in general play seems no better than salah or schurrle.He will provide something different but not an upgrade IMO.This is purely based on youtube. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.