EskWeston 696 Posted May 28, 2008 Author Share Posted May 28, 2008 As I say, defensive football suits the squad. Make the right changes, ie. introduce the likes of Ribery, Kaka, Van der Vaart, and the mentality of the squad changes drastically. Completely agree, i don't think we have the players at the moment to produce the football that is aparently required. I am sure that will be changed this summer no matter who is in charge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 Speaking about whoever may be in charge, Mancini has left Inter, according to his agent. Could be a load of rubbish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted May 28, 2008 Author Share Posted May 28, 2008 Speaking about whoever may be in charge, Mancini has left Inter, according to his agent. Could be a load of rubbish. Looks authentic enough, doesn't mean he is comming here though. The media and the Bookies truly have no idea who it is going to be, a new favorite every day at the moment. At least the club are doing this quietly enough..... although we are aparently interviewing and you would have thought they would have caught wind of a few interviews happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 I hope we dont get mancini. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted May 28, 2008 Author Share Posted May 28, 2008 I hope we dont get mancini. Why is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 (edited) Why is that? He does not give young players a chance. They have one of the best young players coming through their ranks mario balotelli, he is 17 every time he has played he has scored. Including agianst juve he scored 2 then mancini just leaves him on the bench for 4 games then brings him back. Edited May 28, 2008 by Badboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byatt 0 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 (edited) Mark Hughes for me would do the trick. He's a Chelsea fan to start with, played with passion and pride for us during his playing career, which face it he was coming to the end of when he signed for us, and he has the credentials to make the step up to managing a big team. My only question would be, could Sparky manage the ego's of the big name players like Ballack and Shevchenko? Also as i've said before i think Sparky would bring David Bentley to the Bridge with him and that in itself would be a nice bonus. And as for Jose coming back, come on guys get over it Edited May 28, 2008 by Byatt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 (edited) i pick big phil he's got balls of steel and a world cup winner too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edited May 28, 2008 by the wes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 i pick big phil he's got balls of steel and a world cup winner too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its possible, we have a lot of Brazilian connections with the amount of Brazilian and Portuguese players we have at the club. Not my ideal candidate, but he is certainly an experienced chap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 Mancini Sacked. Jose to Inter Milan. And his task is to help them win the UCL next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,363 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 Mark Hughes would be my choice -but realistically I wonder how long before he crossed swords with 30 % Abramovich. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misschief 24 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 (edited) Mancini's a dick. Two of the titles he won buy default and he did his best to throw this years away. He's well known for falling out with the players constantly - there's no ego as big as his in the dressing room. Who wants his style of football anyway? I'd go for Hughes, think he'd make a right good job of it, in fact, the more Ive thought about it, the better I like the idea. Edited May 28, 2008 by misschief Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry26 6 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 Sparky for me as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 So, Sparky is the Fan's favourite!! I dont know why. I wouldnt want a coach just because he was an ex Chelsea player. I would anytime prefer laudrup to hughes. Huges Doesnt have much to show on his CV. Hughes Doesnt play attractive football. And Roman wants both. He wants a winner. and thats why rijkaard is not even in the reckoning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianfranco_Z 202 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Marcello Lippi is the man to take us to the next level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombayblue™ 55 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 (edited) So, Sparky is the Fan's favourite!! I dont know why. I wouldnt want a coach just because he was an ex Chelsea player. I would anytime prefer laudrup to hughes. why? Huges Doesnt have much to show on his CV. and does laudrup? atleast hughes has manged in EPL for 4 years Hughes Doesnt play attractive football. getafe scored 44 goals in la liga all season And Roman wants both. He wants a winner. and thats why rijkaard is not even in the reckoning. Chelsea face fight with Portuguese FA over Scolari The Portuguese Football Federation said last night that Chelsea are keen to appoint Luiz Felipe Scolari as their next manager. "I already know that Chelsea are interested in Scolari," said the federation's vice-president Amandio De Carvalho when asked about the Brazilian's future. Scolari is out of contract after Euro 2008, and the Portuguese confirmed that they want to hold talks with him about a new deal when the squad arrives in Switzerland on Sunday ahead of the tournament. Scolari has also let it be known that he wants to sort out his future in the next couple of weeks which means that Chelsea may have to move quickly if they intend to choose him as Avram Grant's successor. Gilberto Madial, the federation's president, is likely to offer Scolari a new contract and a pay increase – he currently earns €2.4m (£1.9m) a year. The former World Cup winner, who is increasingly unlikely to join Manchester City, knows that he could earn far more at Stamford Bridge. In some ways, however, the scenario is started to look like a re-run of the Football Association's pursuit of Scolari in 2006. With still no consensus from the Chelsea hierarchy on whom they should move for to succeed Grant, the clubs and national associations who believe that their managers are under consideration are moving to shore up their men with new contracts. Mark Hughes is the only British manager in Roman Abramovich's sights, but the Chelsea owner will not get his man cheap if he decides to try and do a deal with Blackburn Rovers this month. Hughes' future at Ewood Park is protected by the same sort of rolling contract deal that Sir Alex Ferguson has with Manchester United. Hughes agreed a two-year fixed contract deal with Blackburn last summer, with an extra year on a rolling contract. There are no plans at the club to speak to their manager (who is currently on holiday) about a new deal this summer because they believe the two years' notice that would have to be paid up on his contract gives them adequate protection. There have been no approaches yet from Chelsea for the 44-year-old. The rolling contract was used by Ferguson when he signed his last deal with United in January 2004 and a similar arrangement means Blackburn can go down to the last year of a contract without fear of losing Hughes without compensation. At the very least, Blackburn will be able to demand one year's value of the contract although that is not likely to be a problem for Abramovich. Hughes, who finished seventh with Blackburn in the Premier League this season, is understood to be the candidate that Peter Kenyon, Chelsea's chief executive, is backing for the job. With no official contact yet for Hughes and an inquiry for the former Germany manager Jürgen Klinsmann – now the new Bayern Munich manager – rebuffed, it is only Roberto Mancini of the front-runners who has announced his candidature. Mancini's drawn-out departure from Internazionale – he announced his intention to quit when they were eliminated by Liverpool from the Champions League in March – came to a close yesterday when Mancini's advisor, Maurizio de Giorgis, confirmed that he had been sacked on Tuesday. He said that there had been no contact with Chelsea, adding: "Roberto Mancini is not a person or coach who likes to propose himself to a club, he waits for a club to look after him so we are in that position right now. "We are not proposing Mancini to any club, but Chelsea are one of the top five clubs in the world so it is more likely, if there will be any talk, for it to happen now rather than then." Jose Mourinho is expected to be named the new manager of the Serie A club within the next two days. The former Chelsea manager's interest in Frank Lampard and Didier Drogba is long-standing, but it now seems that he will also try to recruit his former defender Ricardo Carvalho, who also played for him at Porto, when he takes over the Milan club. Source: Independent Edited May 29, 2008 by bombayblue™ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 I would anytime prefer laudrup to hughes. why? Simply because, There is an oceans gap between the quality of Getafe and Blackburn. Getafe if im not mistaken was just promoted(correct me im wrong) and to take a club like that within a whisker of a semi final of UEFA cup is a far greater achievement. And yes, they do play attacking football. Huges Doesnt have much to show on his CV. and does laudrup? atleast hughes has manged in EPL for 4 years Ans. Atleast laudrup plays entertaining football and not defensive. again refer to my first point. Hughes Doesnt play attractive football. getafe scored 44 goals in la liga all season Ans. Laudrup had argument with the owners who dint provide him with the players he needed. Still he managed to take them to the QF. Blackburn for all the quality that they have have scored 50 and conceded 48 same as Getafe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombayblue™ 55 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Simply because, There is an oceans gap between the quality of Getafe and Blackburn. Getafe if im not mistaken was just promoted(correct me im wrong) and to take a club like that within a whisker of a semi final of UEFA cup is a far greater achievement. And yes, they do play attacking football. Ans. Atleast laudrup plays entertaining football and not defensive. again refer to my first point. Laudrup had argument with the owners who dint provide him with the players he needed. Still he managed to take them to the QF. Blackburn for all the quality that they have have scored 50 and conceded 48 same as Getafe. Getafe were promoted last to last season and finished 9th under Schuster in la liga and for the sensational achievemnt he got the madrid job.. then they played attacking football, the team was already built and only needed a bit of tweaking.. they finished 14th under laudrup.. they had their high scoring games but weren't clinical and hence often resorted to defenidng their lead.. blackburn's quality comes through the manger getting the maximum out of their players, to get santa cruz for 3.5million, and then get all those goals is amazing.. i wouldn't be too off target to suggest blackburn have s[pent marginally more than getafe this season but i'm not sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted May 29, 2008 Author Share Posted May 29, 2008 Another day and we are STILL no nearer knowing who is going to be the new boss. Today we have confirmation that we are looking into Scolari and also that we are taking a look at Carlo Ancelotti.....i really hope this doesn't drag out till after the Euros.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Another day and we are STILL no nearer knowing who is going to be the new boss. Today we have confirmation that we are looking into Scolari and also that we are taking a look at Carlo Ancelotti.....i really hope this doesn't drag out till after the Euros.. I think it might just drag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.