Jump to content

Diego Costa


Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://espnfc.com/blog/_/name/laliga/id/1346?cc=5901

If a player in La Liga wants to leave without his employers being able to stop him and his "cláusula de rescisión" is within the realms of acceptability, the only barrier is that it should be him, and not the club he wants to join, who pays it.

Not a day goes by without my being asked about the accessibility of Diego Costa or Koke's respective buyout clauses.

But here's the rub. Given that it must be the player who pays the (let's say) 50 million euros to the Liga offices, who then devolve it to the club he's leaving, and that most players don't have seven figures in cash just lying around, it's usually the "buying" club that stumps up the money.

If they transfer that to the player so he can pay for his freedom, the Spanish authorities will deem that tax should be generated on the movement of that money. Which type of tax, and how much (potentially anywhere from 21 to 45 percent), will be dictated by a number of factors that I, decidedly not an accounting or legal specialist, decline to try to explain.

However, let's say that the buyout clause of Herrera is 35 million euros and there's 25 percent tax on it; the real fee will be 43.75 million euros. When a Spanish club deal is taking place and a player determinedly wants to go but the outfit he belongs to doesn't want to sell, then what often happens is a wee "scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours" arrangement.

Thanks man, had no idea about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In most cases though, the clubs find an agreement. Instead of 32 mio pounds, lets say they make it 31.999999 or they are paying just more like Bayern did with Thagio. so the release clause isnt really activated. I think we will be able to find an agreement with Atletico, unless any club offers more. especially as we have a good relationship with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The backlash from that would be much worse than overspending.

Essentially that would in a sense be illegal as well, if it was allowed we could spend like 100m every year on players as Roman would just give players money and effectively players start to buy themselves out of their club. We would effectively be spending 0 every year.

Never gonna happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just suffered a horrible injury. Hope it is not a break but did look bad. But with the gash I reckon he is a certainty or possibility to miss the first leg if not both games. Hope it is not as bad as feared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel bad for the guy, if it's broken he will miss not only the deciding match in the La Liga and the Champions League but also his first ever World Cup, not to mention also probably being denied the chance to get a big transfer this summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You