James Rodríguez

[BoyBlue96 990]

Our last Colombian was a fucking coward who fled to Juventus and, still, is on a fucking 3 year loan deal there.

So, really hope this guy gives a better example.

[Kezza 1,965]

17 minutes ago, BoyBlue96 said:

Our last Colombian was a fucking coward who fled to Juventus and, still, is on a fucking 3 year loan deal there.

So, really hope this guy gives a better example.

Our last Spaniard striker couldn't score in a brothel..look at our current

[BoyBlue96 990]

Our last Spaniard striker couldn't score in a brothel..look at our current

Hahahaha.

Poor Torres.

[Kezza 1,965]

Just now, BoyBlue96 said:

 

Hahahaha.

Poor Torres.

 

We also haven't had a good run with Colombians of late though

[Leif 6,006]

4 hours ago, Chelsea? said:

You hate the man for reasons only known by you. How exactly do you know who he brought in? Your posts can't be serious. 

Anyone that looks at our transfer policy will know our signings are mostly geared towards whatever the coach wants or towards what Roman wants. Anyone using reason would say our managers have been in charge of the transfers considering they really seem to fit their players of interest. 

The only times the club seemed to have made signings without a manger or Romans demands were when we signed: KDB, Lukaku(whom AVB himself said was a club signing, not his), Oscar, Tibo, and the whole youth movement a few years back. You think Roman would spend millions on youngsters because some scout said we should do it? Get real, we barely use scouts. And if we do they have been terrible. 

Just stop finding a way to blame him for the bad moves and crediting the good ones to Mariana or some random scouts.  

I think you're relatively new to supporting Chelsea. Your comprehension skills are lacking, too, no offence. I've stated facts only, regarding his roles here, and I've stated facts only, regarding who found which players, which you can clarify for yourself if you dedicate just 15 minutes to browsing the right places. 

I just took a double-take at your post. You really said our managers have been in charge of our transfers, christ. 

*Players signed regardless of manager's opinion: Torres, Hazard, Marin, Cuadrado, van Ginkel, Salah, Rahman, Miazga, Kenedy, Falcao(?). Pato(?), shall I go on?

Out of all those players, which no manager picked for themselves, 1 has succeeded. 1. Who takes that blame, then? We don't live in a world where people are not blamed for their shortcomings, so pick who's responsible, please.

I've given 'Mariana' no credit, so please only respond this time if you take what I say on board, not what you're imagining me saying.

*Ps - 'Random scouts'? You really are new here. We've had some of the greatest scouts to ever be in the game. They are not random, and they do not just sit around doing nothing. They get the credit for our finds, nobody else.

*That's £150m on players who barely scored a goal between them. Half of them barely got a game. Nice one, Emenalo. And no, Hazard's fee was not included in that calculation. 

[the wes 7,212]

3 hours ago, Chelsea? said:

honestly guys, he's surely worth 50mill isn't he

 

He has the ability to be better than Hazard. The knocks on him are not that bad either;he has a better workrate than Hazard and better shooting also. And if he fails we can get 25mil for him. I'm all in!

The only thing rodriguez is better than hazard is his shooting and crossing the ball apart from that hazard better than him at everything else 

[Artandur 939]

37 minutes ago, the wes said:

The only thing rodriguez is better than hazard is his shooting and crossing the ball apart from that hazard better than him at everything else 

Sounds like they'd make quite the pair to me

[Chelsea? 892]

22 minutes ago, the wes said:

The only thing rodriguez is better than hazard is his shooting and crossing the ball apart from that hazard better than him at everything else 

I agree with this. What I really meant was on a given night he has the ability to be better than Hazard. Similar to how Costa can be better than Hazard on a given night. 

Also, I think when engaged, he has better work rate than Eden and is more creative. Eden is the better player overall, but James isn't far off when on form. 

Also with James the possibility of him becoming a superstar is completely there. The last time he had a chance to play regular football he excelled. He won't be leaving us for Madrid or Barca either so that's a plus

[Styles 9,790]

His full highlights from a game last week:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itMLUEDsPB8

 

Better potential than Hazard

 

Look how slow and one footed he is

 

 

75m??????????

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Socur Toxanarosa 145]

He isn't in form and has a lack of confidence atm, don't think he is better than Hazard but he is in the same level talent wise, much better than the likes of Willian and Pedro, really want him to come.

[blu35_army 551]

i don't know,,if Zidane which is one of best coach beside conte right now, can't exploited his talent just like at the monaco. i'm highly doubt that conte can do that...

why not we can trash that money to wenger for sanchez?? or just wait until summer to try mak an offer for aubameyang??

[Leif 6,006]

Just now, blu35_army said:

i don't know,,if Zidane which is one of best coach beside conte right now, can't exploited his talent just like at the monaco. i'm highly doubt that conte can do that...

why not we can trash that money to wenger for sanchez?? or just wait until summer to try mak an offer for aubameyang??

I forgot that he wasn't exactly lighting the world on fire in the playground called Ligue Un. That changes things even more. The other Monaco players did perform to a high-ish standard. But you expect better from an apparent Hazard-level talent.

I think the difference between Hazard and most players, including James, is Eden doesn't complicate matters. He just wants to get the team goals. He was a very direct player at Lille, and he is very direct here, hence tearing both leagues up. Sanchez is very direct, hence tearing this league up. James, is not very direct. That's not to say you have to be direct to be great, but in this scenario, if he simplified his game he would be better.

[kiwi1691 255]

11 hours ago, It's too big said:

Real Madrid really are pampered aren't they? They seem to get let off a lot of things. 

Madrid committed a lesser "crime" than Barca. 

[Chelsea? 892]

20 minutes ago, Leif said:

I forgot that he wasn't exactly lighting the world on fire in the playground called Ligue Un. That changes things even more. The other Monaco players did perform to a high-ish standard. But you expect better from an apparent Hazard-level talent.

I think the difference between Hazard and most players, including James, is Eden doesn't complicate matters. He just wants to get the team goals. He was a very direct player at Lille, and he is very direct here, hence tearing both leagues up. Sanchez is very direct, hence tearing this league up. James, is not very direct. That's not to say you have to be direct to be great, but in this scenario, if he simplified his game he would be better.

James is actually more direct than Eden. Especially when conte wasn't here. If u watch 10min of James the first thing you'll notice is how hard he's always pushing forward. Sometimes too direct. 

[Socur Toxanarosa 145]

Imagine having 3 world class players as the front 3